What Happens If the Wrong Family Is Living in the White House?

            The topic of discussion for this Constitution Monday is a question: What happens if the wrong person was inaugurated as the President of the United States on January 20, 2021? The question about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election continues to grow louder and stronger, and the reasons to doubt the results strengthen.

            As I have said before, there were strange doings across the nation on Election Night 2020. Election fraud is nothing new and most likely takes place in every election. However, the amount of documented fraud that took place in 2020 surpasses that of any other year.

            Jeff Lukens posted an article that collected the evidence of fraud from several different directions. He mentioned the full forensic audit taking place in Maricopa County, Arizona, which is nearing completion. Democrats are panicky about the audit and have tried several different ways to stop it. The latest attempt to stop it was made by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland who addressed the right to vote last Friday. 

Garland called voting “a fundamental element to our democracy” while testifying before Congress. “We know that expanding the ability of all eligible citizens to vote is the central pillar.” He claimed that it is the “duty” of his agency to protect the voting rights of all Americans. He said that the Department of Justice will continue to “protect the democracy to which all Americans are entitled.”

So far this year at least 14 states have passed new laws that make it harder to vote…. Some jurisdictions, based on disinformation, have utilized abnormal post-election audit methodologies that may put the integrity of the voting process at risk and undermine public confidence in our democracy.

            It sounds like Garland will attempt to shut down all audits, but he may have a difficult time with the one in Arizona. The Arizona Senate already went to court about the audit several times and are operating under the approval of the court.

            Lukens next mentioned a report published by Peter Navarro that claims to have evidence of “widespread fraud, ballot-stuffing, and other election irregularities” in the presidential election. The apparent goal of liberals and progressives was to flood the election with illegal votes. Molly Ball confirmed the strategy in her TIME Magazine article. 

Trump said on Dec. 2. “Within days after the election, we witnessed an orchestrated effort to anoint the winner, even while many key states were still being counted.”

In a way, Trump was right.

There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. The pact was formalized in a terse, little-noticed joint statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO published on Election Day. Both sides would come to see it as a sort of implicit bargain – inspired by the summer’s massive, sometimes destructive racial-justice protests – in which the forces of labor came together with the forces of capital to keep the peace and oppose Trump’s assault on democracy.

The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election – an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted. For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions as they came under simultaneous attack from a remorseless pandemic and an autocratically inclined President. Though much of this activity took place on the left, it was separate from the Biden campaign and cross ideological lines, with crucial contributions by nonpartisan and conservative actors. The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory. It was an election so calamitous that no result could be discerned at all, a failure of the central act of democratic self-governance that has been a hallmark of America since its founding.

            The above statements are almost ludicrous, and the “loosely organized coalition of operatives” working in the shadows of the campaign sound a whole lot like secret combinations. Ball’s words sound like she is fulfilling scripture where she calls black white, and white black, evil good and good evil. Her article continues by explaining how the secretive work was accomplished.

Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time. They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears….

            What the secretive correlation accomplished is shown is the following chart published by Peter Navarro. The small print says that the checkmarks indicate “Wide-Spread Evidence,” while the asterisks indicate “Some Evidence.”

 

 

Lukens’s article continued by stating some facts. (1) “Trump received millions more votes in 2020 than in 2016, and Republicans swept most congressional and down-ballot offices.”

(2) “Trump won bellwether Ohio, which no winning president has failed to carry in that state's history, by a more considerable margin than he did in 2016.  Pennsylvania was trending the same on Election Night until they mysteriously stopped counting votes late in the evening.” (3) Republican poll watchers were denied access in several cities, including Philadelphia. (4) “Similar fraudulent actions occurred in Maricopa County, Atlanta, Las Vegas, Detroit, and Milwaukee.”

            Lukens then addressed the cyber-fraud, which is being exposed by Mike Lindell, the owner of MyPillow. Numerous stores have refused to sell his products, and he was forced to create a new social media site that Big Tech cannot de-platform. However, he continues his quest to expose election fraud. Lukens wrote:

Lindell estimates that close to 3,000 cyber-attacks occurred from around the world on Nov. 3-4. He has identified 20 attacks alone where Trump votes were flipped for Biden votes and were enough to change the election outcome. Notice the timestamp, source, and target I.P. address, and the number of Trump votes flipped to Biden. This evidence demonstrates irrefutable foreign interference in our election. The evidence is hard proof that cannot be changed or altered or explained away.

            There are some court cases that have been filed. At least one was filed by Lindell, which he claims that he will win with a 9-0 decision by the Supreme Court. The information compiled by Lindell, which I am assuming is factual, is actually scary. Lindell claimed that these are only 20 of the known attacks, and there are many additional ones.      

            Lukens concluded, “Both Navarro’s ground fraud and Lindell’s cyber-fraud were enough to swing the election independently. Together, there is overwhelming evidence that the election was stolen.” Be sure to check Lukens’ article because the charts may not be allowed on my blog.