What Is Happening in the Media about the Hunter Biden Laptop?

            The conservative media has published information about Hunter Biden and his laptop since 2020. The New York Post published information on the laptop, and leftwing media of all sorts called it “disinformation.” Twitter locked the Post’s account.

The New York Times admitted the laptop was real several weeks ago, but The Washington Post published its first article about it last week. Why are The New York Times, The Washington Post, and other media discussing the laptop now? Tim Graham wrote the following information. 

The one consistent thread in the liberal media’s approach was the notion that all attempts to dig up negative information on Democrats during a campaign are a scandal. But all attempts to dig up negative information on Republicans during a campaign are always the best and the brightest journalism one could find.

Suddenly, the Post reported that Steve Bannon associate Jack Maxey had given it a hard drive from Biden’s laptop contents in June of last year. Maxey told the London Daily Mail that the Post accidentally deleted, and he provided it again in October. So, it looks like it wasn’t overly eager to confirm the documents, certainly not in the way it confirmed the Donald Trump “Access Hollywood” tape contents in one afternoon.

The Post is also very late to acknowledge the truth in a report from Republican Sens. Charles Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin in 2020 on the Biden family’s secretive deals in Communist China. We’re now told that “a Washington Post review confirmed many of the key details and found additional documents showing Biden family interactions with Chinese executives.”

Over the course of 14 months, the Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC China Energy and its executives paid $4.8 million to entities controlled by Hunter Biden and his uncle, James Biden. How many news anchors have talked about James Biden?

This bundle included a $1 million retainer for Hunter Biden to represent Patrick Ho, a shady CEFC official who was under investigation for a multimillion-dollar scheme to bribe leaders from Chad and Uganda. He was later convicted, but the Post reported that Hunter Biden “appeared to have little role representing Ho in the federal case.”

So, why the million bucks?

            Senators Grassley and Johnson have recently reviewed their first report on the laptop and added more information on the Senate floor. In September 2020, they were accused of attacks on Hunter Biden. In fact, The Washington Post claimed that Hunter Biden’s position with Burisma was “problematic” but “the report did not show that it influenced the then-vice president’s behavior or changed the Obama administration’s policy toward Ukraine.”

Conservatives find it interesting that the mainstream media does not use the same “no proof” standard when dealing with leaks about January 6. Why does the Post sound “like a prosecutor when dealing with Trump “scandals” but “like defense lawyers on the Biden family” corruption? Could it be that they realize that Hunter Biden is about to be indicted for corruption?