Who Is Bill Maher?

My VIP for this week is Bill Maher, the liberal talk show host. On Friday’s episode of “Real Time with Bill Maher,” he waded into the latest hot-button topics of the 2024 presidential election: (1) President Joe Biden calling former President Donald Trump’s supporters “garbage,” (2) comedian Tony Hinchcliffe’s joke about Puerto Rico being a floating pile of garbage, and

(3) the media’s deception about Trump’s comment about Liz Cheney being a war hawk.

According to Paul Sacca at The Blaze, Maher said the following about Trump’s statement about Cheney: “Just don’t lie to me. I don’t like Donald Trump. Don’t lie to me and tell me he wants her in front of a firing squad.” He also defended Hinchcliffe: “I’m a comic; I’m a free speech [supporter]…. But this guy’s an insult comic.” Like most people, Maher did not understand why Hinchcliffe was at the event. 

Maher slammed President Biden for calling Trump supporters “garbage” and compared him to New York Yankees slugger Aaron Judge who dropped an easy fly ball in the World Series against the Los Angeles Dodgers.

“I think it’s a bigger gaffe than people think,” Maher said. “It’s so funny, Joe Biden, his whole career, he was like Mr. Gaffe, and then here at the very end – he’s like Aaron Judge in Game 6. He just ____ muffed the fly ball and at the end of the thing and blew the whole [game].”

Maher declared Biden’s insult to be far worse than Hillary Clinton’s disastrous 2016 smear of Trump supporters as “deplorables.”

“Because I feel like it epitomizes everything that the Trump people hate about the Democrats. They look down at us. It’s like ‘deplorables’ times ten,” Maher noted….

“I woke up today to the headline that Trump had called for a firing squad for Liz Cheney,” Maher stated. “And this is what I really don’t like about the media – no, he didn’t. You don’t have to move me to not like Donald Trump more than I already [don’t].”

Maher continued, “He’s criticizing her for being a war hawk. I mean, she is Dick Cheney’s daughter.”

Maher read Trump’s actual quote, “She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK? Let’s see how she feels about it. You know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in the nice buildings saying, ‘Oh gee, well, let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.’” …

Maher noted, “Just to be clear, this is exactly what hippies always said. This is exactly what peaceniks always said…. It’s very easy to sit in your building and send young men to die.”

He declared, “Just don’t lie to me. I don’t like Donald Trump. Don’t lie to me and tell me he wants her in front of a firing squad. He was saying something that, by the way, if it came out of the mouth, some of it, not the stupid part, again, sounds like what hippies used to say about not sending people to [war].”

Maher is not the only liberal calling out the media and the Kamala Harris campaign for saying that Trump was calling for Cheney to be shot. Some point out that Cheney was given a weapon to defend herself, something that is not usually done in a firing squad. Even Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) called the media’s deception “ridiculous, absurd and counterproductive.” Maher did not say anything about Kamala Harris and Liz Cheney pushing the same deception.

What Can We Expect From Either Presidential Candidate?

Election Day will be over by the time that this essay posts, but Americans may not know for days who the next President of the United States will be. Whoever wins the election will determine the border and immigration policy for the next four years.

Simon Hankinson, a senior research fellow in the Border Security and Immigration Center at The Heritage Foundation, gave his best “educated guesses as to what border and immigration policy would look like under either a Trump or Harris administration,” but he qualified his guesses by stating “but nothing is certain.” Hankinson “looked at what the candidates and parties actually said.” 

The Republican Party platform of 2024, written after Trump was the party’s nominee and with his obvious input, stresses “the interests of American workers … over the claims of foreign nationals seeking the same jobs.”

In its one-page Chapter 2 (of 10), the platform says the priority should be to “secure our borders and all ports of entry and to enforce our immigration laws.” For those who break those laws, it continues, “we oppose any form of amnesty.”

Republicans believe the U.S. has been and remains “a haven of refuge” but want to limit asylum to “cases of political, ethnic, or religious persecution.” The platform warns that “refugees who cannot be carefully vetted cannot be admitted to the country.”

In a second term, Trump likely would pursue the same strategy as in his first term, albeit with improved tactics, given some hard lessons learned in the first term….

Trump is often criticized by Harris for opposing a supposedly bipartisan Senate border bill earlier this year. Most Republicans rejected the bill because it would have locked into law controversial Biden administration mass parole programs then allow up to 1.8 million inadmissible aliens to be released into the country each year while they await their immigration hearings, which could be years down the road. (A tougher Secure the Border Act of 2023 passed the House in May 2023 but was not taken up by the Senate.) Here is Trump’s probable agenda for border action, in three key points:

1. Reinstate the Migrant Protection Protocols (also known as “Remain in Mexico”) and Safe Third Country agreements….

2. Resume and ramp up enforcement of immigration laws in the interior of the country. Trump has spoke of the “largest deportation program in American history.” …

3. Prioritize “merit-based immigration,” meaning that the U.S. should select legal immigrants based on factors like youth, job skills, and education and what they can contribute to the United States rather than merely family relationships.

The Democratic Party platform states, “We must secure our border and fix a broken immigration system,” but credits President Joe Biden’s executive actions that “created innovative legal pathways that … have decreased illegal border crossings.” This is a reference, among other things, to Biden’s parole programs that allow specific countries and classes of aliens to arrive illegally at U.S. borders and airports, where they are then paroled in by Customs and Border Protection.

The party platform states Democrats want to “reform the asylum system” by making the process quicker…. It also proposes to “expand legal immigration” and supports a “pathway [to legalization] for long-term undocumented individuals.”

As for Harris, she has slowly clarified her stance on the border during her campaign. It is difficult to distinguish her positions materially from the Biden administration policies of the past four years….

Here is Harris’s probable agenda for border action, in three key points:

1. At the border – Current “lawful pathways,” including mass parole and mass release into the country, would remain the policy at and between ports of entry, presenting marginal impediments to illegal entry. Alternate methods like the Welcome Corps of bringing in additional migrants – whether they qualify as refugees or not – would likely be ramped up.

2. Limited interior enforcement – Once aliens enter and claim asylum, Harris (and current administration talking points) both say that “those who are determined not to have a legal basis to remain should be quickly removed.” But evidence from the past four years suggests that few aliens, once allowed to enter, would be deported.

3. Amnesty – Passing a law to legalize some or all illegal aliens is her clear policy goal. If that is not possible, a Harris administration would fall back on deferred or non-prosecution. Either way, most foreign nationals living here illegally would be permitted to remain. An amnesty bill could contain some procedural requirements, such as proving payment of taxes or proving no criminal record, but a lack of these would not mean automatic deportation.

No one knows for sure what either of the candidates would do if elected to be President of the United States. However, we can look at their records and make educated guesses. I expect a re-elected President Trump to do much the same as he did during his first term, while expecting a President Harris to continue most of the policies of the Biden-Harris administration.

Why Is a Vote for Kamala Harris a Vote Against America?

The topic of discussion for this Constitution Monday is the 2024 presidential election that is ending – finally. There are just three more days until Election Day 2024. Within the next week, Americans should know who they have elected to preside over the United States for the next four years.

Former President Donald Trump is having a lot of fun as he crisscrosses the nation. He took the time to work a fifteen-minute shift at McDonalds and to make a meme about taking out the trash. He is hitting the seven swing states time after time as well as campaigning in deep blue states such as New York and New Mexico.

Vice President Kamala Harris is not having fun. In fact, her campaign of “joy” disappeared weeks ago. All that she has now is anger and hate. She offers no insights into her planned policies but has a constant string of smears about Trump. Here is what the great Victor Davis Hanson had to say about the way that Harris is ending her campaign with lies and smears. 

In the last two weeks, Vice President Kamala Harris has been trying to revive her stagnant campaign by smearing former President Donald Trump as being Hitlerian and a fascist. She claims Trump is planning to put his enemies in encampments.

Yet in the modern era, it was not Trump who put large numbers of U.S. residents and citizens into “relocation camps,” but liberal Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt who sent Japanese American citizens and residents into them.

If Harris refers to Trump’s supposed fascist policies during his prior four-year tenure, there is no such evidence.

Nonetheless, the once “joyful” Harris is ending her campaign by trafficking in lies and smears reminiscent of the Joe McCarthy era.

Recall that fascists hijack law enforcement and the military to suspend constitutional rights and punish enemies. But Trump did neither.

Instead, in 2016, a corrupt FBI went after Trump himself during the Obama administration with the bogus Steele dossier.

The FBI, which in 2016 had hired the faker Steele, in 2020, fused with social media to suppress accurate news reporting of the embarrassing Hunter Biden laptop scandal.

A number of FBI directors and intelligence officials – John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, Andrew McCabe – who openly sought to destroy Trump had a long history of either lying or feigning amnesia under oath.

Fascists try to warp the legal system. But Trump’s own Justice Department selected an independent special counsel to investigate the invented Russian collusion accusations against him.

In vast contrast, the Biden Justice Department coordinated with Georgia prosecutors Fani Willis and Nathan Wade, special counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan prosecutor Alvin Bragg, and New York Attorney General Letitia James to prosecute Trump, bankrupt him, and keep [him] off the campaign trail.

Fascists use their governments to destroy their enemies.

During Trump’s term, for the first time in history, the House of Representatives impeached a first-term president twice. And in another first, the Senate tried Trump as a private citizen….

Fascists seek to change existing laws to destroy opponents and illegally consolidate power.

Currently, it is only the Democrats who seek to pack the court, destroy the Electoral College, end the Senate filibuster, and create two new states and thus gain four left-wing senators.

In key states, they radically changed voting laws….

Fascists arbitrarily nullify any laws they feel do not aid their agendas. Biden-Harris destroyed immigration law in order to bring in more than 12 million illegal aliens and gain new constituencies.

They also protected sanctuary cities, as some 600 such jurisdictions illegally and with impunity nullified federal immigration laws in neo-Confederate fashion.

Fascists seek to politicize the military.

But in Trump’s case, his former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley, brazenly violated the Uniform Code of Military Justice by libeling Trump as a fascist.

Worse still, Milley sabotaged the chain of command by ordering theater commanders to report directly to him in times of serious crises.

And in a near-treasonous fashion, Milley contacted his Chinese communist counterpart in the People’s Liberation Army to assure him that he would warn the Chinese military before carrying out any Trump order he felt existentially dangerous….

Fascists seek to control and weaponize the media. So, Facebook and Twitter both conspired with the FBI to censure news accounts favorable to Trump….

Why then the charges of Trump the fascist and Hitler reincarnation?

Simple. Harris’ personal negatives are rising, her polls inert….

Harris is now confirming to voters that she really can neither think nor speak well and has no consistent agenda that appeals to the middle class.

So, in final desperation, Harris is smearing Trump as a fascist, even though, ironically, he has been the target of fascist machinations from her own party and supporters for nearly a decade.

Half of American voters voted against Trump in 2020 and instead voted for Joe Biden even though he was already showing signs of senility. His campaign hid him in a basement with the excuse of the pandemic to keep Americans from seeing the truth about him.

Now, many of those same voters will vote for Harris who campaigns on lies and smears about Trump rather than putting forth policies of how she would make life better for Americans. If Americans elect Harris after living through the past four miserable years, and seeing the evidence of corruption and evil right in front of our eyes, America deserves what it gets.

Biden, Harris, and numerous other people from both political parties are clinging to power. They work for their own benefit rather than working for the benefit of all Americans and bring great corruption into the federal government. In the words of an ancient American prophet-king:

Now it is not common that the voice of the people desireth anything contrary to that which is right; but it is common for the lesser part of the people to desire that which is not right; therefore this shall ye observe and make it your law – to do your business by the voice of the people.

And if the time comes that the voice of the people doth choose iniquity, then is the time that the judgments of God will come upon you; yea, then is the time he will visit you with great destruction even as he has hitherto visited this land (Book of Mormon - Another Testament of Jesus Christ, Mosiah 29:26-27).

 

What Is Godly Sorrow?

My Come Follow Me studies for this week took me to Mormon 1-6 in a lesson titled “I Would That I Could Persuade All … to Repent.” The lesson was introduced with the following information. 

Mormon spared us the “full account” of the “awful scene” of wickedness and bloodshed that he saw among the Nephites (Mormon 2:18; 5:8). But what he did record in Mormon 1-6 is enough to remind us how far people who were once righteous can fall. Amid such pervasive wickedness, no one could blame Mormon for becoming weary and even discouraged. Yet through all that he saw and experienced, he never lost his sense of God’s great mercy and his conviction that repentance is the way to receive it. And although Mormon’s own people rejected his pleading invitations to repent, he knew that he had a larger audience to persuade. “Behold,” he declared, “I write unto all the ends of the earth.” In other words, he wrote to you (see Mormon 3:17-20). And his message to you, today, is the same message that could have saved the Nephites in their day: “Believe the gospel of Jesus Christ. … Repent and prepare to stand before the judgment-seat of Christ” (Mormon 3:21-22).

Mormon’s story of preserving the records of the Nephites can be seen in this video titled “Mormon Preserves the Record” (26:37 minutes). As with most Come Follow Me lessons, this lesson covers several principles: (1) I can follow Jesus Christ regardless of what other people do (Mormon 1-6), (2) They did not realize that it was the Lord that had spared them (Mormon 3:3, 9), and (3) Jesus Christ stands with open arms to receive me (Mormon 5:8-24; 6:16-22).

This lesson will discuss a fourth principle, “Godly sorrow leads me to Christ and to lasting change (Mormon 2:10-15. We will begin with the scripture block.

10 And it came to pass that the Nephites began to repent of their iniquity, and began to cry even as had been prophesied by Samuel the prophet; for behold no man could keep that which was his own, for the thieves, and the robbers, and the murderers, and the magic art, and the witchcraft which was in the land.

11 Thus there began to be a mourning and a lamentation in all the land because of these things, and more especially among the people of Nephi.

12 And it came to pass that when I, Mormon, saw their lamentation and their mourning and their sorrow before the Lord, my heart did begin to rejoice within me, knowing the mercies and the long-suffering of the Lord, therefore supposing that he would be merciful unto them that they would again become a righteous people.

13 But behold this my joy was vain, for their sorrowing was not unto repentance, because of the goodness of God; but it was rather the sorrowing of the damned, because the Lord would not always suffer them to take happiness in sin.

14 And they did not come unto Jesus with broken hearts and contrite spirits, but they did curse God, and wish to die. Nevertheless they would struggle with the sword for their lives.

15 And it came to pass that my sorrow did return unto me again, and I saw that the day of grace was passed with them, both temporally and spiritually; for I saw thousands of them hewn down in open rebellion against their God, and heaped up as dung upon the face of the land. And thus three hundred and forty and four years had passed away (Mormon 2:10-15).

Mormon saw that his people were sorrowful, and he hoped that they would repent. However, he realized that “their sorrowing was not unto repentance” (Mormon 2:13). They did not feel godly sorrow but worldly sorrow. The difference between the two types of sorrow can be seen in verse 14: Godly sorrow moves people closer to Christ, while worldly sorrow causes people to curse God.

Sister Michelle D. Craig, then First Counselor in the Young Women General Presidency, said the following in the October 2018 General Conference of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 

These prophetic calls to action, coupled with our innate sense that we can do and be more, sometimes create within us what Elder Neal A. Maxwell called “divine discontent.” Divine discontent comes when we compare “what we are [to] what we have the power to become.” Each of us, if we are honest, feels a gap between where and who we are, and where and who we want to become. We yearn for greater personal capacity. We have these feelings because we are daughters and sons of God, born with the Light of Christ yet living in a fallen world. These feelings are God given and create an urgency to act. [Emphasis added.]

We should welcome feelings of divine discontent that call us to a higher way, while recognizing and avoiding Satan’s counterfeit—paralyzing discouragement. This is a precious space into which Satan is all too eager to jump. We can choose to walk the higher path that leads us to seek for God and His peace and grace, or we can listen to Satan, who bombards us with messages that we will never be enough: rich enough, smart enough, beautiful enough, anything enough. Our discontent can become divine—or destructive.

Heavenly Father and His Son Jesus Christ live on a higher, holier level than mere mortals like you and me. IF we want to return to Their presence and to become like Them, then we must prepare ourselves to do so. One of the ways that we can move to a higher level is to allow divine discontent to help each of us to become the person that we want and need to be.

Why Does the Left Lie About Abortion?

Families are stronger when they know the truth about abortion, and strong families strengthen communities, states, and nations. The Left tends to hide the truth and/or lie about abortion, while the Right tends to put out the truth about abortion. Thomas Jipping and Sarah Parshall authored an article about how abortion was built on fraud.

Jipping and Parshall referenced an essay written by Dr. Chavi Eve Karkowsky, a physician who practices maternal-fetal medicine, and published by The New York Times. They claim that “the campaign for unlimited abortion is as fraudulent and deceptive as ever.” 

From the beginning, the “right” to abortion was built on fraud. Abortion advocates pushed states to repeal their pro-life laws with baseless claims about illegal abortions. The claim that “thousands” of women died from illegal abortions began in the 1960s and persists even today. The National Center for Health Statistics says the real number was just 36 in 1973 – the year that the Supreme Court issued its Roe v. Wade decision. The Washington Post’s “Fact Checker” column gave Planned Parenthood its worst rating of “Four Pinnocchios” for that lie.

In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court created a fictional account of abortion history that long ago was exposed as radically revisionist. The strategy behind Roe was built on so-called “scholarship” that even the pro-abortion lawyers believed strained credibility. Pro-abortion historians since Roe have tried to maintain the fiction, deliberately erasing the 19^th-century feminists and physicians who opposed abortion from their duplicitous narrative.

Since 2022, when the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade with its opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, abortion advocates have achieved most of what they said they want. All but four states banned abortion from conception in 1973; 14 states do so today. No state allowed abortion until birth before Roe; nine states do so now.

Even the most restrictive post-conception abortion ban, at six weeks, covers barely half of abortions. The laws in effect in 1973 prohibited more than 90% of abortions; the laws in effect today allow more than 80%.

The cataclysmic fallout of Roe’s overturning – a narrative pushed by the abortion lobby – has not, in fact, come to pass. Though based on her writing, one would be hard pressed to think that Dr. Karkowsky thinks otherwise.

Back to Karkowsky’s essay in The New York Times. The physician professes concern that women are using abortion drugs “far from the supervision of qualified medical providers.” But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration previously required such supervision for more than 20 years after approving mifepristone, the primary abortion drug, in 2000.

That was the case until the Biden-Harris administration deregulated the abortion pill mifepristone in 2021, ostensibly because of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, the action made the pill easier to get, more dangerous, and less predictable in its effects.

Among the changes: The federal government eliminated the requirement of an in-person doctor’s visit to secure the abortion pill, expanded use of the pill from seven to 10 weeks’ gestation, and allowed women to obtain pills by mail.

This was foolhardy.

For a drug with known and serious potential side effects (including incomplete abortions, severe bleeding, failed abortions, and infection), the Food and Drug.

Administration’s regulatory determinations made a dangerous pill even more dangerous.

In fact, FDA’s own warning label on mifepristone states that complications from using the abortion pill can reach a frequency of between 2.9% and 4.6%. In 2023 alone, that represents nearly 20,000 emergency room visits for medication abortion patients. And now there’s an active disinformation campaign by abortion advocates about what state pro-life laws say and how they apply.

The authors continued with using the case of Kate Cox as an example. Her claim was that the pro-life law of Texas did not allow her to have abortion. “It turns out, as the Texas Supreme Court explained hers was also a fraudulent tale.”

Then there is Cox’s doctor, an abortion advocate. He “chose not to make the medical finding that, under the Texas statute, would have allowed her abortion.” Instead, he “filed an unnecessary request for a court order that, thanks to the lawyer’s decision, was certain to be denied.”

Cox claimed that “she had no choice but to leave Texas to get an abortion,” but she was actually part of “a legal hoax to sow seeds of confusion and doubt about the state’s pro-life law.”

Abortion advocates spin other fraudulent yarns. They claim that laws prohibiting abortion also block medical care for miscarriage or ectopic pregnancies. Others say pro-life laws require that a pregnant woman literally be at death’s door before a doctor may treat her for complications.

None of these claims is true. Not one.

No one can make wise decisions without honest information. Abortion is about ending the life of at least one child. Individuals who know the truth about abortion can strengthen their families, and strong families strengthen their communities, states, and nations.

What Type of Government Takes Political Prisoners?

The liberty principle for this Freedom Friday is the problem with the U.S. Government taking political prisoners. Steve Bannon, a political pundit and former White House chief strategist for President Donald Trump, was convicted for contempt of Congress -- disrespecting the January 6^th Committee by refusing to comply with a subpoena from the committee. He served four months in the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, Connecticut.

Bannon was released from prison on Tuesday morning and was in the “War Room” on Real America’s Voice a few hours later. He and his attorneys hosted a press conference Tuesday afternoon in New York City. Bradley Devlin wrote the following in his article published at The Daily Signal. 

“Nancy Pelosi sent me to a federal prison,” Bannon said on Tuesday morning’s livestream. “She sent me to a federal prison as a political prisoner to do two things: To make sure that she tried to tamp down the power of this show … and also to break me.”

Bannon had a message to the former speaker of the House: “Nancy Pelosi, take out your No. 2 pencil and write this down: This show has never been more powerful, the voices behind it have never been more powerful, the audience has never been more powerful, and we’re going to deliver a knockout blow to your progressive insanity on 5 November.” …

At Bannon’s press conference in New York on Tuesday afternoon, Bannon said he learned a lot from his fellow inmates, which he described as mostly working-class black and Hispanic men. In particular, he said that these men see Vice President Kamal Harris as someone who has incarcerated minority populations en masse.

“The system of the Justice Department is broken,” Bannon said, adding that the DOJ and the federal government writ large have been ‘weaponized’ by the Left against a ‘conservative grassroots movement.’”

Why Did Trump Hold a Rally at the Madison Square Garden?

Former President Donald Trump kicked off the final full week of campaigning for the 2024 presidential season at the Madison Square Garden in New York City, an arena that holds 20,000 people and was packed. There was an A-list of speakers that included Tucker Carlson, Dr. Phil McGraw, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Hulk Hogan, Dana White, Elon Musk, and numerous prominent Republicans. In a rare appearance at campaign events, former First Lady Melania Trump introduced her husband as the next Commander-in-Chief and welcomed him to the stage. Virginia Allen at The Daily Signal listed three take-aways from the event. 

‘Honor to Win New York’

New York is not a swing state. Trump trails Democratic candidate Kamala Harris by about 15 percentage points in New York, where Joe Biden won over 60% of the vote in 2020. Nevertheless, Trump made an appeal to his fellow New Yorkers Sunday night. “It would be such an honor to win New York. Hasn’t been done in decades. Hasn’t been done in so long,” Trump said.

New York has not voted for the Republican presidential candidate since the 1980s….

Big Campaign Promises

Trump spent a great portion of his one hour and 20-minute speech talking about two of the biggest issues in the 2024 presidential election – the economy and immigration.

“If I win, we will quickly build the greatest economy in the history of the world,” the former president pledged.

Trump went on to share some details of his economic agenda, including his plan to cut taxes and implement tariffs….

Trump repeatedly returned to the issue of border and immigration throughout his speech, telling the crowd that the border issue is “bigger than inflation, it’s bigger than the economy.”

Customs and Border Protection has encountered over 10 million illegal aliens on America’s borders under the Biden administration. In September, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced that more than 662,000 criminal illegal aliens were released into the interior of the U.S. Among those, 435,719 had already been convicted of a crime, with 226,847 more facing pending criminal charges.

“But the day I take the oath of office, the migrant invasion of our country ends and the restoration of our country begins,” Trump said, later pledging “on day one” to “launch the largest deportation program in American history and to get the criminals out.

‘Just Not Running Against Harris’

Trump repeatedly criticized Harris Sunday night, and claimed he is “just not running against Kamala,” adding that the Democratic candidate is “purely a vessel.”

“We’re running against something far bigger than Joe [Biden] or Kamala [Harris], and far more powerful than them, which is a massive, vicious, crooked, radical left machine that runs today’s Democrat Party,” he said.

My long-time readers know my opinion about this “machine.” It is a secret combination or group of secret combinations foretold in the Book of Mormon to exist in all nations in the last days. Kamala Harris is a puppet, just as Joe Biden was a puppet to do the will of the machine. Secret combinations destroy freedom and governments because they seek power over individuals and nations. Vote Trump and support him as he destroys the power of the secret combinations controlling our government!