Who Is Lindsey Graham?

My VIP for this week is the late Republican Senator Lindsey Graham. As explained by Suzanne Bates in her article at the Deseret News, Graham was known as a hawk. His last official act was a visit to Ukraine and a visit to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. 

Among the Republicans in the US Senate, Graham was a champion for Ukraine and had a strong belief that the United States must support Ukraine against the Russian invasion. One of his last legislative actions was to lobby for more tariffs on countries that buy oil and gas from Russia. He also supported the decision to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. He defends Israel, the lone democracy in the Middle East.

With Graham’s death comes the continued attrition – through deaths and retirements – of Republican hawks, those who believe in a muscular foreign policy, including, when necessary, through military intervention.

The trio of Graham and the late Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona and Democratic-turned-independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut – all now passed away – reshaped U.S. foreign policy in the 2000s under the belief that the United States must assert itself as the lone superpower in order to maintain an uneasy peace in the world.

When the U.S. steps back from this role, it is inevitably pulled back in, hawks argue. Like after the 1990s, when Clinton was wary of foreign entanglements in a post-Cold War world. But the U.S. was reawakened to global threats on Sept. 11, 2001, when terrorists attacked New York and Washington, D.C., killing thousands of Americans.

Or in 2015, when, after President Barack Obama tried to “reset” the U.S.’s relationship with Vladimir Putin, the Russian president invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea.

And again in 2022, during the Biden administration, when Russia again invaded Ukraine, starting a protracted war between the two countries.

The long-term military campaigns in Afghanistan, which had almost universal support after 9/11, and in Iraq, which had less support, led to the recent weariness Americans feel when their leaders propose intervention.

Anti-interventionists in the Republican Party, those who support the “America First” movement, long criticized Graham for his hawkishness, turning “neocon” into a pejorative.

Now, without Graham, is there a Republican senator who will take up that mantle? Especially amid a new, increasingly unpopular war against Iran….

Is Trump a dove or a hawk?

Trump, with his “Peace through Strength,” foreign policy agenda, is far more interventionist than his America First supporters would like. Vice President JD Vance is the hero of those more populist Republicans, while hawkish Republicans typically back Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Rubio, and Graham before his death, appear to be in a dwindling minority. Instead, the ascendant position in conservative circles is that it isn’t America’s job to police the world. Instead, we should protect our own.

No matter how powerful the United States is, or how big its economy, it cannot block itself from an anarchic world….

Graham believed in American strength, and its ability to be a force for good around the world. In a piece about the need to spend more on the Navy, Graham wrote: “There is no doubt that the costs of these investments are great and will require tradeoffs and significant political capital, but the cost of inaction will be far greater. History demonstrates that adversaries are emboldened by America’s hesitation and deterred by its resolve.”

Perhaps a successor to Graham will emerge among Republican senators. It’s hard to imagine he or she will possess his same wit or unique biography, but others with his skills seemed irreplaceable before.

In most foreign entanglements, including in Iran, the answer of intervention versus protectionism isn’t black and white. We need both doves and hawks to debate and argue over American foreign policy decisions.

But we need hawks like Graham to remind us that we ignore the world at our own peril.

Bates’ article reminded me of George Washington and his warning against foreign entanglements. He did not approve of any permanent alliances or attachments to foreign nations but thought that the United States should stand for neutrality and prudent engagement.

In his Farewell Address of 1796, Washington urged the United States to avoid permanent alliances with any foreign nation, but at the same time, honoring existing treaties. He desired the young nation to stand independent in foreign affairs. He thought that America should be friends with all and enemies to none but should always stand ready to defend America. Hence, peace through strength. 

What Are the Threats against America?

The topic of discussion for this Constitution Monday concerns threats in America that go “beyond the familiar divide between Democrats and Republicans.” According to Ben Shapiro in his article published at The Daily Signal, there are “two ideological movements – one on the far left, one emerging on the populist right.” The two movements “share a willingness to undermine the principles that have long defined the American experiment.” After opening his article with the quoted information, he explained as follows. 

On one side stands the Democratic Socialists of America, whose influence within the Democratic Party has grown dramatically. This is no longer simply a debate over tax rates or entitlement programs. The party’s activist wing has become increasingly hostile to the ideas that have undergirded th3e country for 250 years: freedom of speech, religious liberty, private property, free markets and the belief that America is an exceptional nation worth preserving.

The political consequences are no longer hypothetical. Democrats have a realistic chance to regain control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections. Competitive Senate races across North Carolina, Ohio, Maine, Texas, Alaska, and Iowa underscore how narrow the margins have become. If Democrats were to reclaim both the House and Senate, the ramifications would extend far beyond the next two years.

The federal judiciary is the clearest example.

Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are both in their late 70s. Should vacancies arise while Democrats control the Senate, the ideological balance of the court could shift for a generation. A new liberal majority would influence constitutional interpretation on everything from executive authority and religious liberty to economic regulation and the administrative state. At the same time, Democrats would accelerate confirmations throughout the federal judiciary, leaving an imprint that would outlast any single administration.

Those stakes make recent developments on the right especially consequential.

Tucker Carlson has spent recent weeks floating the idea of launching a third political party, arguing that Republicans and Democrats are effectively indistinguishable on issues of war, spending and finance. He portrays America’s two-party system as little more than a single political establishment masquerading as democracy.

That argument ignores the most significant policy differences in American politics. Republicans and Democrats remain sharply divided over taxation, judicial appointments, regulation, free markets, energy policy, and the proper role of government. Pretending those distinctions no longer exist requires overlooking the very issues that define modern elections….

[Carlson’s] current rhetoric politically [is] significant even if no third party ever appears on the ballot. Republicans already face the historical disadvantages of defending Congress during a president’s midterm. Voices on the right openly rooting for Republican defeats only increase the likelihood that Democrats, increasingly influenced by their progressive wing, will gain power.

Following the nation’s semiquincentennial, the debate should return to first principles rather than political personalities.

For 250 years, America’s strength has rested on enduring ideas: constitutional government, individual liberty, private property, free enterprise, religious freedom and peace through strength. Those principles have survived wars, economic crises and political upheaval because each generation chose to defend them rather than discard them.

The greatest challenge facing the country may not come from a single ideological movement but from competing factions that, despite their differences, are increasingly willing to abandon those foundational principles. If the United States is to thrive to its 300^th anniversary, its 500^th and beyond, it will depend not on charismatic personalities or political factions but on whether Americans remain committed to the ideals that made the republic possible.

 

Who Is with You?

My Come Follow Me studies for this week took me to 2 Kings 2-7 and a lesson titled “There Is a Prophet in Israel.” The following information introduced the lesson material. 

A prophet’s main mission is to teach and testify of the Savior Jesus Christ. Our record of the prophet Elisha, however, doesn’t include much of his teaching or testifying. What the record does include is the miracles Elisha performed, including raising a child from the dead (see 2 Kings 4:18-37), feeding a multitude with just a little food (see 2 Kings 4:42-44), and healing a leper (see 2 Kings 5:1-14). So while we don’t have Elisha’s words about Christ, we do have Elisha’s ministry and miracles, which do testify of Christ. They are powerful manifestations of the Lord’s life-giving, nourishing, and healing power. Miracles happen more often in our lives than we sometimes realize. To see them, we need to seek the faith Elisha had when he prayed on behalf of his fearful young servant: “Lord, I pray thee, open his eyes, that he may see” (2 Kings 6:17).

The scripture block for this week teaches four main principles, including the following: (1) God can work miracles in my life (2 Kings 2-6); (2) The Lord will fulfill His words given through His prophets (2 Kings 4:8-17; 7:1-16); (3) As I am humble and obedient, Jesus Christ can heal me

(2 Kings 5); (4) “They that be with us are more than they that be with them” (2 Kings 6:8-23). This essay will discuss the last principle about those who are with us being more. First, we will study the scripture verses (2 Kings 6:8-18).

8 ¶ Then the king of Syria warred against Israel, and took counsel with his servants, saying, In such and such a place shall be my camp.

9 And the man of God sent unto the king of Israel, saying, Beware that thou pass not such a place; for thither the Syrians are come down.

10 And the king of Israel sent to the place which the man of God told him and warned him of, and saved himself there, not once nor twice.

11 Therefore the heart of the king of Syria was sore troubled for this thing; and he called his servants, and said unto them, Will ye not shew me which of us is for the king of Israel?

12 And one of his servants said, None, my lord, O king: but Elisha, the prophet that is in Israel, telleth the king of Israel the words that thou speakest in thy bedchamber.

13 ¶ And he said, Go and spy where he is, that I may send and fetch him. And it was told him, saying, Behold, he is in Dothan.

14 Therefore sent he thither horses, and chariots, and a great host: and they came by night, and compassed the city about.

15 And when the servant of the man of God was risen early, and gone forth, behold, an host compassed the city both with horses and chariots. And his servant said unto him, Alas, my master! how shall we do?

16 And he answered, Fear not: for they that be with us are more than they that be with them.

17 And Elisha prayed, and said, Lord, I pray thee, open his eyes, that he may see. And the Lord opened the eyes of the young man; and he saw: and, behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha.

18 And when they came down to him, Elisha prayed unto the Lord, and said, Smite this people, I pray thee, with blindness. And he smote them with blindness according to the word of Elisha.

Even though I try to follow Christ, there are times in my life when I feel outnumbered and fearful, much like the young servant of Elisha. I remember this experience of Elisha and his young servant, and I try to stay faithful in difficult circumstances. Sometimes it helps to make a list of those people who are in my life and support me. It helps to remember that God has probably placed me in the lives of other people to help them.

President Henry B. Eyring taught the following about this scripture story: “Like that servant of Elisha, there are more with you than those you can see opposed to you. Some who are with you will be invisible to your mortal eyes. The Lord will bear you up and will at times do it by calling others to stand with you” (“O Ye That Embark,” Ensign or Liahona, Nov. 2008, 58). 

In Doctrine and Covenants 84:88, the Lord describes the support that He offers to us: “And whoso receiveth you, there I will be also, for I will go before your face. I will be on your right hand and on your left, and my Spirit shall be in your hearts, and mine angels round about you, to bear you up.” Consider times when you felt the Lord supporting you. You might also consider this question: What does God want me to see?

Elder Ronald A. Rasband of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles referred to the story in 2 Kings 6:8-23 when he said the following:

We may or may not have chariots of fire sent to dispel our fears and conquer our demons, but the lesson is clear. The Lord is with us, mindful of us and blessing us in ways only He can do. Prayer can call down the strength and the revelation that we need to center our thoughts on Jesus Christ and His atoning sacrifice. The Lord knew that at times we would feel fear. I have been there and so have you. … In this Church we may be few in number by the way the world counts influence, but when we open our spiritual eyes, ‘they that be with us are more than they that be with them’ [2 Kings 6:16]” (“Be Not Troubled,” Ensign or Liahona, Nov. 2018, 18, 19). 

Since God has probably placed people within your sphere of influence, how would you use these words to help those who feel anxious or afraid?

How Can Families Be Strengthened?

Families are stronger when “responsible citizens and officers of government everywhere … promote those measures designed to maintain and strengthen the family as the fundamental unit of society” (“The Family: A Proclamation to the World”). Strong families strengthen communities, states, and nations. 

The above referenced proclamation was read by President Gordon B Hinckley, as part of his message at the General Relief Society Meeting of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints held September 23, 1995, in Salt Lake City, Utah. It was later published by the Church of Jesus Christ.

While researching information on strengthening families, I found a web site sponsored by the State of Alaska, Department of Family and Community Services. The web site is titled “Strengthening Families Alaska.” 

According to the web site, Strengthening Families Alaska “is a research-informed, strength-based approach to helping families reduce stress, address risk factors, and promote healthy development.” The site continues: “The overarching goal is the promotion of child and family well-being .. based on engaging families, programs and communities in building five protective factors that help families succeed and strive, even in the face of risk and challenges.”

The Strengthening Families approach

·       Benefits ALL families and communities

·       Builds on family strengths, buffers risk, and promotes better outcomes

·       Can be implemented through small but significant changes in everyday actions

·       Builds on and can become a part of existing programs, strategies, systems and community opportunities

·       Is grounded in research, practice and implementation knowledge

What is special about this approach?

Communities, providers, and families can embed five protective factors seamlessly into their ongoing work to the benefit of families and children. Five Protective Factors are the foundation of the Strengthening Families Approach…. Research studies support the common-sense notion that when these Protective Factors are well established in a family, the likelihood of child abuse and neglect diminishes. Research shows that these Protective Factors are also “promotive” factors that build family strengths and a family environment that promotes optimal child and youth development.

Protective Factors

The Center for the Study of Social Policy initially spent two years researching and identifying five protective factors that prevent child abuse and neglect. Since the introduction of the Strengthening Families approach, the research base that originally informed the development of the protective factors framework, as well as scientific advances in various disciplines, has burgeoned. These advances in knowledge have deepened the understanding about child development and behavior, the developmental impacts of trauma, and the pathways to child and family well-being…. The five protective factors associated in research that are related to the prevention of child maltreatment are:

·       For adults:

§  Parental resilience

§  Social connections

§  Knowledge of parenting and child development

§  Concrete support in times of need

·       For children:

§  Healthy social and emotional development

What Is the First Freedom and Why Is It Essential?

The liberty principle for this Freedom Friday is that “religious freedom undergirds the very existence of America.” President Dallin H. Oaks of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints authored an essay about the First Amendment, moral absolutes, and why the Constitution was created for a religious people. The essay was published at the Deseret News and was adapted from an earlier address given at Chapman University School of Law. 

Here is a note from the Editor: The centrality of religious freedom to the revelatory nature of America’s founding is why we’ve curated seminal selections on this first freedom in honor of America’s 250^th anniversary. These essays highlight the critical role faith played and continue to play in living out the inherent truths of the Declaration of Independence.

The first provision in the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution is what many believe to be its most important guarantee. It reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

For almost a century, the First Amendment’s guarantee that the United States shall have “no law (prohibiting) the free exercise (of religious)” has been understood as a limitation on state as well as federal power. The guarantee of religious freedom is one of the supremely important founding principles in the United States Constitution, and it is reflected in the constitutions of all 50 of our states.

As noted by many, the guarantee’s “pre-eminent place” as the first expression in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution identifies freedom of religion as “a cornerstone of American democracy.” The American Colonies were originally settled by people who, for the most part, came to this continent for the freedom to practice their religious faith without persecution, and their successors deliberately placed religious freedom first in the nation’s Bill of Rights.

So it is that our federal law formally declares: “The right to freedom of religion undergirds the very origin and existence of the United States,” So it is, I maintain, that in our nation’s founding and in our constitutional order, religious freedom and its associated First Amendment freedoms of speech and press are the motivating and dominating civil liberties and civil rights. Religious teachings and religious organizations are valuable and important to our free society and therefore deserve special legal protection.

Our nation’s inimitable private sector of charitable works originated and is still furthered most significantly by religious impulses and religious organizations…. Religious beliefs instill patterns of altruistic behavior.

Many of the great moral advances in Western society have been motivated by religious principles and moved through the public square by pulpit-preaching. The abolition of the slave trade in England and the Emancipation Proclamation in the United States … were driven primarily by individuals who had a clear vision of what was morally right and what was morally wrong. In our time, the Civil Rights Movement was, of course, inspired and furthered by religious leaders.

Religion also strengthens our nation in terms of honesty and integrity. Modern science and technology have given us remarkable devices, but we are frequently reminded that their operation in our economic system and the resulting prosperity of our nation rest on the honesty of the men and women who use them…. These standards and practices of honesty and integrity rest, ultimately, on our ideas of right and wrong, which, for most of us, are ground in principles of religion and the teachings of religious leaders.

Our society is not held together just by law and its enforcement, but most importantly by voluntary obedience to the unenforceable and by widespread adherence to unwritten norms of right or righteous behavior. Religious belief in right and wrong is a vital influence to advocate and persuade such voluntary compliance by a large proportion of our citizens.

Others, of course, have a moral compass not expressly grounded in religion….

My final example of the importance of religion in our country concerns the origin of the Constitution. Its formation over 200 years ago was made possible by religious principles of human worth and dignity, and only those principles in the hearts of a majority of our diverse population can sustain that Constitution today. I submit that religious values and political realities are so interlinked in the origin and perpetuation of this nation that we cannot lose the influence of religion in our public life without seriously jeopardizing our freedoms.

The founders who established this nation believed in God and in the existence of moral absolutes – right and wrong – established by this Ultimate Lawgiver. The Constitution they established assumed and relied on morality in the actions of its citizens. Where did that morality come from and how was it to be retained? Belief in God and the consequent reality of right and wrong was taught by religious leaders in churches and synagogues, and the founders gave us the First Amendment to preserve that foundation for the Constitution.

The preservation of religious freedom in our nation depends on the value we attach to the teachings of right and wrong in our churches, synagogues and mosques. It is faith in God that translates these religious teachings into the moral behavior that benefits the nation.

Articles of Faith: What Do Latter-day Saints Believe About the Godhead 4?

 

Article of Faith 1

We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ,

                                and in the Holy Ghost.

 

This is the fourth article on the Godhead in my series on the Articles of Faith of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The past few weeks, I discussed a statement by the Prophet Joseph Smith in a lecture on faith titled “The Character of God.” Early in the lecture, he shared three things that are necessary to have faith in God strong enough to lead to salvation. The statement is important enough to repeat in this discussion. 

Let us here observe, that three things are necessary, in order that any rational and intelligent being may exercise faith in God unto life and salvation.

First, The idea that he actually exists.

Secondly, A correct idea of his character, perfections and attributes.

Thirdly, An actual knowledge that the course of life which he is pursuing is according to his will. — For without an acquaintance with these three important facts, the faith of every rational being must be imperfect and unproductive; but with this understanding, it can become perfect and fruitful, abounding in righteousness unto the praise and glory of God the Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.

Two weeks ago, I discussed the personality of each member of the Godhead, or Trinity. Last week, I used the words of Elder James E. Talmage to share some of the divine attributes of the Godhead (The Articles of Faith [1890], pp. 42-44). This week, I will share the words of Elder Bruce R. McConkie (A New Witness for the Articles of Faith [1985], 45-50) to discuss how God is or can be known to everyone.

1. God is known by instinct.

All men are spirit children of God the Eternal Father. In the premortal life we all dwelt in his presence, saw his face, and heard his voice. We were as well acquainted with him in that day as we are with our earthly fathers in this. The spirit within us is the offspring of God. Now housed in a tabernacle of clay, it is the intelligent, sentient, believing, knowing part of the human personality. The mind of man is in the spirit.

The probationary nature of our mortal estate calls for us to forget the life we lived and the experiences we had when we dwelt in the courts of the Eternal King. But it does not divest us of the spiritual and mental talents we acquired while in that eternal world. We are born into mortality with every innate capacity, every instinct to believe truth and cleave unto light, every faculty and ability with which we were then endowed.

Further, as part of life itself, all mortals are endowed with a heavenly gift called the light of Christ. This divine endowment manifests to us the difference between good and evil. We do not need to be taught what is right and wrong. This knowledge is bred in our bones; it is hereditary; it is innate, inborn, and intuitional in nature. Call it conscience, if you will, say that it is a divine inheritance from a Divine Parent; identify it as a spark of divinity sent by Deity to fire the soul with the flames of righteousness; call it the Spirit of Christ – it has many names. But what counts is that it is real. It is “the true light that lighteth every man that cometh into the world.” (D&C 93:2.) Of it Mormon said: “The Spirit of Christ is given to every man, that he may know good from evil.” (Moroni 7:16.) In a revelation to Joseph Smith the Lord called it “the Spirit of Jesus Christ, and the Spirit giveth light to every man that cometh into the world.” All receive a divine inheritance at birth. It is a free gift as far as any act performed in mortality is concerned….

2. God is known by reason.

Man’s instinctive belief in God and his inborn desire to worship a Supreme Being is strengthened by reason. The seeds of belief are watered from the wells of reason, and the tree of faith soon sprouts in the believing soul. And the more man learns about himself and all the mysteries and marvels of the human body; the more he knows about life in all its forms and varieties; the greater his knowledge becomes about the planets and suns that sweep through the starry heavens – the more he knows about all things, the clearer it becomes to him that there is a divine hand, an omnipotent power, a supreme person, a ruling law that first created and now governs all that is. Truly, all things attest that there is an Almighty God. “All things denote there is a God,” Alma said, “yea, even the earth, and all things that are upon the face of it, yea, and its motion, yea and all the planets which move in their regular form do witness there is a Supreme Creator.” (Alma 30:44.)

But seeking God by reason alone and through intellectual processes without more is fraught with peril. It is easy for a rational mind to see order in the system of creation and to learn of the laws by which worlds and galaxies are controlled. There are evidences of design on every hand; cause and effect operate in the animal and vegetable kingdoms as well as with the rocks and the rains. The peril lies in assuming that the laws and powers are God, in worshipping and serving “the creature more than the Creator.” (Romans 1:25.)

Neither instinct nor reason, nor the two combined, sets forth the nature and kind of being whom men must worship to gain salvation. Both simply lay a foundation and chart a course leading to a knowledge of the true and living God. Every rational person knows there is some supreme power, some first great cause, some omnipotent force in the universe. The reasoning step that follows this recognition is that the design is not the designer, the contrivance is not the contriver, the law and power are not the being by whom these came. The existence of created things simply bears witness that there is a Creator….

3. God is known through history and tradition.

Because God created man in his own image and likeness and placed him on earth as an essential requirement for gaining salvation, because salvation is gained through a knowledge of God and an obedience to the laws of his gospel, and because eternal life itself consists of knowing the Father and the Son, it follows that God must in necessity reveal himself and his laws to man. This he did. Adam our father, the first man of all men, the primal parent of the human race, received a knowledge of God by revelation. God the Eternal Father walked and talked with him in the Garden of Eden; the Lord Jehovah appeared to him after the fall; and from angelic ministrants and by the gift of the Holy Ghost he learned the saving truths of the gospel. This was the beginning of the knowledge of the true God among man. “And Adam and Eve blessed the name of God, and they made all things known unto their sons and their daughters.” (Moses 5:12.)

Adam is the pattern. He stands as earth’s first prophet, and among his righteous descendants a host of prophets are numbered. At least eight generations of descendants lived to hear his teachings. Presiding high priests representing seven of these generations (Seth, Enos, Cainan, Mahalaleel, Jared, Enoch, and Methuselah) were all with him at Adam-ondi-Ahman when the Lord Jehovah appeared and ministered among them. (D&C 107:53-55.) To see and commune with either the Father or the Son is to know them both, for hey are in the express image of each other and are one in all they do….

4. God is known by revelation.

Though every man in his inner being, by instinct and in the very marrow of his soul, knows there is a God; though logic and sense and reason, and the persuasive voice of nature, and the thunderous trumpet of creation, all bear witness that there is a God; though the voice of our fathers, carried to us by history and tradition, speaks the common consensus of all men that there is a God --- yet, in the final and supreme sense, there is only one way to know God. That way is by revelation. Where religion and divine beings are concerned, we are in the realm not of the mind and of the human senses, but of the Spirit. God stands revealed or he remains forever unknown. The Holy Ghost is a revelator. His mission is to reveal truth and to bear witness of the Father and the Son. There is no other way to gain knowledge of the true and living God; revelation alone is the source of that perfect wisdom….

“How do men obtain a knowledge of the glory of God, his perfections and attributes?” the Prophet [Joseph Smith] asked. His answer: “By devoting themselves to his service, through prayer and supplication incessantly strengthening their faith in him, until, like Enoch, the brother of Jared, and Moses, they obtain a manifestation of God to themselves.” (Lectures on Faith 2, Questions and Answers.) “Verily, thus saith the Lord: It shall come to pass that every soul who forsaketh his sins and cometh unto me, and calleth on my name, and obeyeth my voice, and keepeth my commandments, shall see my face and know that I am.” (D&C 93:1.)

What Will Democratic Socialists Do to the Political Picture?

Democratic Socialists are in the process of taking control of the Democratic Party. First, there were Senator Bernie Sanders and “the squad” in the US House of Representatives. Then Zohran Mamdani was elected to be the mayor of New York City. Last week, Colorado Democrats chose a Democratic Socialist to be the Democrat nominee for Congress. There is a definite movement towards Communism, which Michael Freund discusses in his article published in The Daily Signal. 

Every political movement eventually reveals what it truly believes. And when it does, voters have a choice to make.

For years, Americans were told that the radical Left was little more than a noisy fringe, loud on social media but marginal in real life. That claim is now hard to sustain. Candidates aligned with or inspired by the Democratic Socialists of America are winning elections, shaping debates, and pulling the Democratic Party further from the mainstream. As Speaker of the House Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., recently warned, “There are many Mamdanis popping up,” in reference to New York City’s far-left mayor.

For Republicans, this is not only a warning sign. It is also an opportunity.

The rise of the DSA and the broader radical Left has created a widening gap between the Democratic Party’s activist base and many of its traditional voters. Millions of Americans who long considered themselves Democrats are discovering that the party is no longer the same as the one they joined.

Political realignments begin when voters feel that their old political homes no longer reflect their values, concerns, or common sense. That is how Reagan Democrats emerged in the 1980s. It is how many blue-collar voters drifted away from a Democratic Party that seemed more interested in elite cultural causes than working families. As Ronald Reagan himself once quipped, “I didn’t leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me.”

A similar opening may now be developing.

Many Jewish voters, for example, have supported Democrats for generations out of habit, conviction, and a belief that the party stood firmly against bigotry. But especially since the Hamas massacre in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, many of them have watched with unease and horror as anti-Israel activism and outright antisemitism became more prominent in progressive politics. They have seen Jewish students harassed on campuses, anti-Zionist rhetoric treated as fashionable, and too many elected officials speak with moral ambiguity about Hamas when clarity was required.

For many American Jews, this has been a painful awakening.

Republicans should not assume that Jewish voters will abandon a century of voting patterns overnight. But they should recognize that a door has opened. The GOP can make the case that it is the party most committed to defending Israel, combating antisemitism, protecting religious liberty, and preserving the freedoms that have allowed Jewish life in America to flourish.

But Jewish voters are only one part of a much larger political story. Across the country, millions of moderate Democrats increasingly feel politically homeless.

They have never thought of themselves as conservatives, but they do believe in public safety. They want police to be supported, not vilified. They believe parents should have a meaningful voice in their children’s education. They want a strong economy, affordable energy, secure borders, and a government that lives within reasonable limits.

They do not wake up thinking about revolutionary politics. They just want normalcy, stability, opportunity, and a country they can proudly pass on to their children.

These voters are not unreachable. But they must be reached.

That requires persuasion.

Republicans need to speak to disaffected Democrats in a language that invites rather than alienates. Joining the GOP does not require having voted Republican one’s entire life. It does not require abandoning compassion, concern for the poor, or civic responsibility. It only requires recognizing that the supposedly good intentions of Democrats are no substitute for sound policy, and that a free society cannot survive if every institution is captured by ideology.

The GOP should become the natural home for Americans who believe in ordered liberty, economic opportunity, strong families, religious freedom, public safety, and patriotism without apology.

Reaching these people means showing up in communities Republicans have too often written off. It means speaking directly to Jewish voters and independents in New York, Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and even California. It means addressing suburban parents ignored by school bureaucracies. It means talking to working-class Democrats who believe their party now cares more about academic slogans than grocery bills, crime, housing, and wages.

Most of all, it means offering a positive vision.

Voters rarely switch parties due to anger alone. They switch when they believe there is somewhere better to go.

Republicans should resist making this moment only about what the Left has become. They must also explain what the Right has to offer: a country where hard work is rewarded, children are taught to love America, religious communities are respected, streets are safe, allies are defended, and government serves the people.

When one party moves too far from the center of gravity of the American people, the other has a chance to build a new majority.

But that opportunity will not seize itself.

The rise of the DSA is bad for the Democratic Party and dangerous for the country. But it may also become the catalyst for a broader Republican coalition – one that brings together conservatives, Jews alarmed by antisemitism, moderates tired of extremism, parents fighting for their children, and traditional Democrats who still believe in the promise of America.

The radical left is pushing them away. Republicans should now act to welcome them in.