The gun control
debate continues. The Feinstein bill,
which protects the right to bear arms for some Americans while infringing on
that right of other Americans, was introduced in Congress. Common sense and reason do not appear to have
any influence on those who want to control Americans. Those who want to ban guns apparently do not
remember that banning alcohol did not work, banning drugs did not work, and
banning illegal immigration did not work; yet they think criminals will obey a
gun ban! It is really true: we cannot cure stupid!
The following information is one
of the best-worded arguments for guns that I have read. It is very interesting but different than the
usual arguments. It was written by
Major. L. Caudill USMC (Ret) and is entitled “The Gun is Civilization.”
“Human beings only have two ways
to deal with one another: reason and
force.
“If you want me to do something
for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or forcing me
to do your bidding under threat of force.
“Every human interaction falls
into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that’s it.
“In a truly moral and civilized
society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of
social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the
personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.
“When I carry a gun, you cannot
deal with me by force. You have to use
reason and try to persuade me because I have a way to negate your threat or
employment of force.
“The gun is the only personal
weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a
75-year-old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year-old gang banger, and a
single guy on equal footing with a carload of drunken guys with baseball
bats. The gun removes the disparity in
physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a
defender.
“There are plenty of people who
consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we’d be
more civilized if all guns were removed from society - because a firearm makes
it easier for an armed mugger to do his job.
That, of course, is only true if the mugger’s potential victims are
mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat; it has no validity
when most of a mugger’s potential marks are armed.
“People who argue for the
banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many;
and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a
successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force
monopoly.
“Then there’s the argument that
the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in
injury. This argument is fallacious in
several ways. Without guns involved,
confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming
injury on the loser. People who think
that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don’t constitute lethal force watch too
much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at
worst. The fact that the gun makes
lethal force easier works solely I favor of the weaker defender, not the
stronger attacker. If both are armed,
the field is level.
“The gun is the only weapon
that’s as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a
weight lifter. It simply wouldn’t work
as well as a force equalize if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable.
“When I carry a gun, I don’t do
so because I am looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left
alone. The gun at my side means that I
cannot be forced, only persuaded. I
don’t carry it because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be
unafraid. It doesn’t limit the actions
of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those
who would do so by force.
“It removes force from the
equation … and that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.”
By
Major L. Caudill USMC (Ret.)
According to Major Caudill, the
greatest civilization is one where all citizens are equally armed and can only
be persuaded but never forced. So why is
our government acting to disarm all its citizens? Think about it real hard because only governments
that do not trust their citizens desire to disarm them. Why does our government distrust its honest, law-abiding,
and patriotic citizens? I believe they
are trying to do things that we really and truly do not want them to do!
Gun Co
No comments:
Post a Comment