The national discussion
continues about how to fix the immigration system. There are those among us who say we should make
a “path to citizenship” for all the illegal aliens in the United States, and
there are those of us who say to close the borders before any more
discussion. There are still others who
say that we need to enforce the immigration laws currently on the books in
order to fix our immigration system.
The Democrat-majority U.S.
Senate passed a “monstrosity” of a bill in June 2013, and Republican-majority members
of the U.S. House of Representatives are
being pressured to pass a similar “comprehensive immigration reform” bill. Democrats generally appear to prefer big
comprehensive bills while the House Republicans generally prefer to take
problems a step at a time. Democrats
want some pathway to citizenship while conservative Republicans want the borders
closed first. Americans have the opportunity
to confront our representatives in Congress while they are in their home states
on their August recess. We the people
must speak up and make our voices known.
The Heritage Foundation suggests we understand five different questions and their answers: 1) How can we afford an amnesty for illegal
immigrants? (Answer: “We can’t.
Over their lifetimes, the estimated 11.5 million illegal immigrants
would cost federal, state, and local taxpayers trillions of dollars because
they will consume significantly more in government benefits and services than
they pay in taxes” as well as “depress wages for low-skilled Americans and make
a tough job market more difficult.”)
2) If illegal immigrants win
amnesty, how is that fair to the 4.5 million who are waiting to enter the
United States legally? (Answer: “It isn’t fair. America prides itself on the rule of law. As Americans, we should not allow those who
break our laws to be rewarded – especially at the expense of those who are
abiding by the rules….”)
3) Can we ensure that a
House-passed immigration bill doesn’t become a vehicle, in a deal with the
Senate, for blanket amnesty?
(Answer: “No, we can’t. With massive costs to taxpayers and
carve-outs for special interests, the Senate-passed bill eerily resembles
Obamacare in its unnecessary complexity….”)
4) Does Congress need to pass
new legislation to secure the border and strengthen interior enforcement?
(Answer: “No. Current laws can be used to settle our border
security and interior enforcement problems.
The reason those laws aren’t working is simple: We aren’t enforcing them….”)
5) Is there any guarantee that
we won’t face this problem again with millions of new illegal immigrants in the
future? (Answer: “No.
We should keep a close eye on all proposals. In 1986, proponents of `reform’ promised the
American people that if Congress passed an amnesty-first immigration bill, we
wouldn’t have to go through this debate again.
We were told to trust Congress to put together an amnesty bill that
would be fair and prevent illegal immigration once and for all. Fast forward to now, and we’re experiencing
the same problems but on a larger scale.
If Congress doesn’t secure the border first to stop the flow of illegal
immigration and also enforce our laws, we will find ourselves back in the same
situation. The Congressional Budget
Office projected that if the Senate bill became law, millions of new illegal
immigrants would be here within a few decades.”)
No comments:
Post a Comment