Families,
communities, and nations are strengthened when we teach the importance of
marriage to the rising generation. Our
youth and young adults must understand that marriage is good for both grownups
and children. Just one of the ways that
marriage is good for us is the fact that absence of marriage presents a high
risk for poverty.
I do not usually pay much
attention to most liberal articles and/or opinions; therefore, I was pleasantly
surprised when I saw an article in our local newspaper entitled “Marriage improves the chances that you will avoid poverty” by columnist Kathleen Parker.
Ms. Parker
suggests that luck is “a single, unquantifiable factor” in the War on
Poverty. She claims that luck is
responsible for whether we are born with the “misfortunes of the poor” such as
“broken families, often to single mothers, in neighborhoods where systemic
poverty, inferior educational opportunities and perhaps even crime” or “the
natural gifts of appearance, athleticism, intelligence or musical talent” that
comes to those who are “born into stable, educated families with financial
security and grown-up parents.”
I am not too surprised to see
that a liberal thinks it is luck rather than hard work, self-control,
acceptance of responsibility for self and family, etc. I agree with her that our nation needs to do
something to help those people who are in poverty without perpetuating the need
for help. If the War on Poverty has
taught us anything, it should be that when people are given handouts – whether
it is food stamps, cash, or whatever – they lose the desire to work for what
they get. We could learn something from
the popular and only successful program that came from President Franklin D.
Roosevelt’s New Deal during the Great
Depression. Instead of simply handing
out taxpayer funds, FDR required people to work for what they got.
We should require work from
anyone who gets taxpayer money. Why
should some Americans work hard to earn money simply to have it taken and given
to those who refuse to work? This is not
right, nor is it fair. There is however a
much more important step that our federal government should take.
Since being single is “one of
the highest risk factors for poverty,” we should be encouraging marriage. Marriage is different than two adults living
together and sharing expenses. “This is
because marriage creates a tiny economy fueled by a magical concoction of love,
selflessness and a permanent commitment that holds spirits aloft during tough
times.
“In the absence of marriage,
single parents (usually mothers) are left holding the baby and all the
commensurate challenges and financial burdens.
As a practical matter, how is a woman supposed to care for little ones
and/or pay for child care, while working for a minimum wage that is
significantly less than what most fair-minded, lucky people would consider
paying the house cleaner? Not very well.
“Setting aside the issue of
choice in reproductive matters, one easily observes that we live in a culture
that devalues and mocks marriage, reducing the institution to a buffet
item. The lucky can hire a pedigreed
baby sitter en route to the next dinner party, dropping a buck in the beggar’s
cup, while the unlucky are strapped to a welfare check or low-paying job and a
no-hope future.
“Obviously, marriage won’t cure
all ills. Every single parent could
marry tomorrow and she still wouldn’t have a job. But in the War on Poverty,
rebuilding a culture that encourages marriage should be part of the
arsenal. The luck of the draw isn’t
nearly enough – and sometimes old ideas are the best new ideas.”
No comments:
Post a Comment