Americans will go on Daylight
Savings Time (DST) in about a month even though most of us have no idea why we
have to change our clocks twice each year. According to this site, the idea for changing the clocks in the summer originated with Benjamin
Franklin. He recognized that people could enjoy more daylight in the summer
evenings and save energy by simply changing the clocks. His idea did not gain
traction until May 1916 when Germany established DST to save energy during
World War I and the rest of Europe quickly followed. The United States took
some time to adopt DST but did so in 1918.
DST ended soon after World War I was
over and did not start again until February 9, 1942, at the start of World War
II. At that time it was called “War Time” and lasted all year. States and
cities had the choice of whether or not to use DST after the war – at least
until 1966 when the Uniform Time Act was passed. At that time any state that
chose – with the emphasis on choice – to observe DST would have to follow a
uniform protocol for the entire state with DST starting on the first Sunday of April
and ending on the last Sunday in October. In 2007 the Energy Policy Act of 2005
expanded DST to the current timing. DST now starts on the second Sunday in
March and lasts until the first Sunday in November.
States can opt in or opt out of DST.
Arizona and Hawaii do not observe DST, and some states consider opting out each
year. I think that one reason why states do not actually opt out is the
difficulty of dealing with states surrounding them being on a different time
schedule. I personally believe that DST makes little difference to my home
state of Alaska because we have almost endless daylight in mid-summer and only
five hours of daylight in mid-winter. One hour one way or the other means
little to us. I believe that the reason that Alaska observes DST is to stay in
sync with the rest of the nation.
Since the shift to DST will arrive
in about a month, Americans would be wise to decide how we will use it to our
advantage this year. One of my nieces keeps her children on a year-round
schedule. During the winter she gets them up at 8:00 but lets them sleep until
9:00 in the summer. It is the same sleep schedule, so they do not need to
adjust.
I personally find that traveling
during the DST change is difficult, so I do not plan any trips during the
weekends of change. This way my body does not have to adjust to jet lag while
also adjusting to DST. I happen to be married to a night owl who likes to stay
up late. When the time jumps forward in the spring, I continue to go to bed on
the same schedule, which is good because it is actually an hour earlier than
winter time.
I would like the nation to make a
final decision. If DST is so wonderful, why not have it year around? If it is
not good enough for year round, why have it at all? The energy savings – the reason
for having it in both World War I and World War II – do not amount to much now because
we have better lighting and heating systems. The lack of real energy savings
may not be worth the additional health and accident problems that come at the
changing of the clocks. Congress should weigh the pros and cons and make a final
decision that would take us out of this ever-changing daylight schedule.
No comments:
Post a Comment