As
can be expected, Big Labor did not want the bills to become laws and did its
best to kill the Right to Work bills.
Big Labor knows that it loses money when individual workers have the
freedom to decide for themselves whether or not they wish to join or give money
to unions. Michigan is also home of the automobile
industry and the United Auto Workers Union.
Amy Payne of The Heritage Foundation wrote, "Regardless of news reports, the people of Michigan are behind this. A recent poll showed that 51 percent of Michigan voters support
right-to-work. Only 41 percent are
opposed. In fact, 40 percent of union
households supported it. In November, Michigan voters rejected
a ballot proposal that would have amended the state constitution to prevent the
legislature from passing a right-to-work law and elevated union contracts above
state law. The New York Times called it `a test case on enshrining the rights
of unions" and unions spent more than $23 million campaigning for the
initiative. It lost by 15 points."
Big
Labor worked hard to keep these bills from becoming laws. Lawsuits were filed, protesters were brought
in by bus,
teachers called in sick, and
legislators walked out of session. They
even brought in their biggest "gun," even President Barack Obama to
campaign for Big Labor in Detroit .
As he does with almost every subject, Obama lied
and twisted the truth: "What we shouldn't be doing is trying to take away
your rights to bargain for better wages and working conditions. We shouldn't be doing that. These so-called `right to work' laws, they
don't have to do with economics; they have everything to do with politics. What they're really talking about is giving
you the right to work for less money."
President
Obama could not have been more wrong in his words. The right-to-work laws have everything to do
with economics because they provide and protect jobs and more jobs translate
into a better economy.
James Sherk of The Heritage Foundation explained exactly why the President's words were untrue.
"Right-to-work laws prevent unions from imposing mandatory fees,
giving employees the right to work without paying union dues. Otherwise, right-to-work has no effect on
collective bargaining. All other negotiations
continue as before."
In
November 2011 Sherk published a paper entitled "Right to Work Increases Jobs and Choices." He began his paper by explaining, "Union
contracts frequently require employees to pay union dues or lose their
jobs. This forces workers to support the
union financially even if the union contract harms them or they oppose the
union's agenda. Several states … are
considering right-to-work laws, which protect workers from being fired for not
paying union dues. Unions oppose these
laws because they reduce union membership and income. However, the rest of the economy benefits
from right-to-work laws. Right-to-work
laws reduce the financial benefit from organizing workplaces where unions have
limited support. This makes unions less
aggressive and encourages business investment, creating jobs. States can and should reduce unemployment by
becoming right-to-work states."
If
you want to see an example of how Big Labor defends its hold on workers, take a look at this video.
Think
about the hate and contention shown in that video and think of the
following: "For verily, verily I say unto you, he that hath the spirit of
contention is not of me, but is of the devil, who is the father of contention,
and he stirreth up the hearts of men to contend with anger, one with
another" (Book of Mormon -
Another Testament of Jesus Christ, 3 Nephi 11-29).
The
Lord taught that anyone who has the "spirit of contention" is of the
devil; therefore, any person or any organization that operates on contention of
any kind is serving the "dark side" of society. We should support right-to-work laws for this
very reason: they lessen the power of
those who use contention to gain control of other people.
No comments:
Post a Comment