The topic of
discussion for this Constitution Monday comes from Article III, Section 2,
Clause 1: “The judicial Power shall
extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the
Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under
their Authority; -- … to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction….” This clause has to do with the jurisdiction
of courts of law over cases concerning ships or the sea and other navigable
waters.
|
“Because maritime and admiralty cases
relate to problems lying outside the normal jurisdiction of a state, this
provision gives litigants the RIGHT to have their case heard in a federal court”
(W. Cleon Skousen in The Making of
America – The Substance and Meaning of the Constitution, p. 600).
Skousen also provided the
following quote from Alexander Hamilton:
“The judiciary authority of the Union ought to extend … to all [cases]
which originate on the high seas, and are of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction…. Maritime causes … so generally depend on the
laws of nations and so commonly affect the rights of foreigners that they fall
within the considerations which are relative to the public peace” (The Making of America, p. 600).
“In England, a long-established
separate system of courts, beginning with Edward III, dealt with maritime and
admiralty issues. According to Sir
William Blackstone in Commentaries on the
Laws of England, these courts had jurisdiction `to determine all maritime
injuries, arising upon the seas, or in parts out of the reach of the common
law.” During the Revolution, state prize
courts often violated international law by condemning prizes belonging to
sister states, or nations that were neutral or even allies of the United
States. Consequently, after Independence,
both the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution gave the national
government exclusive admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. In Philadelphia, the only debate among the
Framers of the Constitution was whether to lodge admiralty questions in a
separate court or, as they finally decided, in the federal judiciary. There was unanimity, even among the Anti-Federalists,
that this power should be national” (David F. Forte in The Heritage Guide to the Constitution, p. 247).
No comments:
Post a Comment