What do you know
about the curriculum known as Common Core? I have read and heard things about this
program that brought concern to me; therefore, I wanted more understanding of
it. The first thing that I wanted to
know is if my state – Alaska – has adopted this curriculum. According to this site, forty-five
states and the District of Columbia - plus the territories of American Samoa
Islands, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and U.S. Virgin Islands as well as the
Department of Defense Education Activity - have adopted the Common Core State
Standards. The five remaining states
which have not yet adopted Common Core are Alaska, Minnesota, Nebraska, Texas,
and Virginia plus the territory of Puerto Rico.
This information relieved my mind a little bit but not much because I
have grandchildren living in two states that have adopted the curriculum.
Texas, one of the five states
that rejected Common Core still has problems in its education system with its
CSCOPE curriculum. CSCOPE was designed
by a private corporation as “instructional material.” Because it is not “curriculum,” it escaped
scrutiny until lately. The Lessons are
written by CSCOPE staff and former teachers and are not shared or accessed to
parents. An independent vigilant group
known as CSCOPE Review discovered a lesson plan in which the Boston Tea Party
was compared to “an act of terrorism.”
Students were also assigned to “design the flag for a new socialist
nation.” Texans are becoming more and
more aware of what CSCOPE involves and hopefully will take proper action to
protect the rising generation.
I found this statement in my
effort to gain more knowledge about the Common Core State Standards Initiative: “The Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led
effort that established a single set of clear educational standards for
kindergarten through 12th grade in English language arts and
mathematics that states voluntarily adopt.
The standards are designed to ensure that students graduating from high
school are prepared to enter credit bearing entry courses in two or four year
college programs or enter the workforce.
The standards are clear and concise to ensure that parents, teachers,
and students have a clear understanding of the expectations in reading,
writing, speaking and listening, language and mathematics in school.”
The mission statement for Common
Core State Standards is to “provide a consistent, clear
understanding of what students are expected to learn, so teachers and parents
know what they need to do to help them.
The standards are designed to be robust and relevant to the real world,
reflecting the knowledge and skills that our young people need for success in
college and careers. With American
students fully prepared for the future, our communities will be best positioned
to compete successfully in the global economy.”
The above information sounds
okay. We want our elementary and
secondary students to learn what they need to know in order to be prepared for
college and/or career and to take their rightful place as responsible
adults. So why is there so much concern
about what our students are being taught?
I believe we are being told something different than what is actually
taking place.
The Blaze reported some disturbing information being taught in
upstate New York as part of a Common Core-aligned lesson on government and
human rights. A father said that “his
daughter and her classmates are being taught a section on the 30 `universal
human rights’ declared by the United Nations in 1945. Those rights include the right to a
nationality, and to change that nationality whenever you want to; the right to
a job for everyone who wants one; the right to `social security’ (to be taken
care of by the government when you cannot do it yourself); the right to food,
clothing, housing and medicine; the right to work and join a union (One of the
rights also states that you cannot be compelled to join an association.); the
right to play.
When this father of a fifth
grade student at the public school sent an email to his daughter’s teacher
questioning the lessons, he received a telephone call from the principal of the
school. During the telephone
conversation, the father learned that the lessons are tied to the Common Core
guidelines found on EngageNY; the U.N.’s
Universal Declaration of Human Rights was being taught for about an hour each
day over an eight-week period while the U.S. Constitution was part of another
eight-week `government’ section, however only three weeks were spent studying
it. He was told that the principal
believes that most public schools in the state are using this program as well
as others from Common Core. The
principal also disclosed that he “was not happy about the curriculum mandates,
but was powerless to do anything about it.
All of the decisions and directions came from the state.”
The article at The Blaze said that the students were
taught that they had many other “rights” such as the right to work; the right
to equal pay for equal work; the right to just and favorable pay in order to
have “an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by
other means of social protection;” the right to “a standard of living adequate
for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food,
clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services;” “the right
to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old
age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control; all
children shall enjoy the same social protection whether they are born in or out
of wedlock.” The students are apparently
being taught that “the government would be expected to provide just about
anything a person needs from cradle to grave.”
The father learned that the
students watch videos – 30 short videos about each of the Human Rights -
produced by the Church of Scientology.
This sounds like a possible violation of the oft-cited separation of
church and state, but the attorney father had a greater concern. His concern was that “a specific competing
political policy (from the U.N.) is being taught in greater detail than the
U.S. Constitution.” A related concern
was that “students are then being called to action and asked to sign a petition
supporting a list of rights that have no legal standing in our country.”
The Blaze continued their investigation by contacting the New York
State Education Department. They were
referred to a basic information website for Common Core information, and their
five questions have not yet been answered by the department.
The Utah State Legislature
passed a bill adopting Common Core and the governor signed it in February
2013. In an article in the Deseret News, Oak Norton wrote: “Common Core is
the biggest education boondoggle foisted upon the American people, and it will
prove to be worse as time goes on. How
will Utah students be better prepared than anyone else in the United States
when they are being commonly trained for the same jobs? …”
A commenter on
this article wrote: “Those who study
Common Core and don’t just accept the propaganda that is being shared by the
education system, find there are no studies that are benchmarked, and no high
standards but a form of dumbing down our education and our children. A form of government control is being
installed that will greatly affect our ability to make any kind of future
change.
“Common Core ignores your
child’s uniqueness. Common Core puts
your child in a national database for cradle to grave tracking. Common Core will prepare your child for
technical school, but not all colleges.
Common Core math standards are lower than our old standards. Common Core English standards reduce great
literature reading in high school to 30% of reading, while 70% is for
`informational texts.’ Common Core was
not `state led’ or `internationally benchmarked’. The players behind Common Core are large
corporations aiming to massively grow profits by getting all students on the
exact same new learning schedule. You
could rename this Corporate Core.”
Marion Brady, veteran
teacher, administrator, curriculum designer and author, wrote about problems with
Common Core. “Variously motivated corporate interests,
arguing that the core was being sloppily taught, organized a behind-the-scenes
campaign to super-standardize it. They
named their handiwork the Common Core State Standards to hide the fact that it
was driven by policymakers in Washington D.C., who have thus far shoved it into
every state except Alaska, Minnesota, Nebraska, Texas, and Virginia.
“This was done with insufficient
public dialogue or feedback from experienced educators, no research, no pilot
or experimental programs – no evidence at all that a floor-length list created
by unnamed people attempting to standardize what’s aught is a good idea.
“It’s a bad idea. Ignore the fact that specific Common Core
State Standards will open up enough cans of worms to keep subject-matter
specialists arguing among themselves forever.
Consider instead the merit of Standards from a general perspective: 1) Standards shouldn’t be attached to school
subjects, but to the qualities of mind it’s hoped the study of school subjects
promotes. Subjects are mere tools ….
Teachers should be held accountable for the quality of what they produce, not
how they produce it.
2)
The world changes. The future is
indiscernible. Clinging to a static
strategy in a dynamic world may be comfortable, even comforting, but it’s a
Titanic-deck-chair exercise.
3)
The Common Core Standards assume that what kids need to know is covered by one
or another of the traditional core subjects.
In fact, the unexplored intellectual terrain lying between and beyond
those familiar fields of study is vast, expands by the hour, and will go in
directions no one can predict.
4)
So much orchestrated attention is being showered on the Common Core Standards,
the main reason for poor student performance is being ignored – a level of
childhood poverty the consequences of which no amount of schooling can
effectively counter.
5)
The Common Core kills innovation. When
it’s the only game in town, it’s the only game in town.
6)
The Common Core Standards are a set-up for national standardized tests, tests
that can’t evaluate complex thought, can’t avoid cultural bias, can’t measure
non-verbal learning, can’t predict anything of consequence (and waste boatloads
of money).
7)
The word `standards’ gets an approving nod from the public (and from most
educators) because it means `performance that meets a standard.’ However, the word also means `like everybody
else,’ and standardizing minds is what the Standards try to do. Common Core Standards fans sell the first
meaning; the Standards deliver the second meaning. Standardized minds are about as far out of
sync with deep-seated American values as it’s possible to get.
8)
The Common Core Standards’ stated aim - `success in college and careers’ – is
at best pedestrian, at worst an affront.
The young should be exploring the potentials of humanness.”
Brady concluded his article
thusly, “Future historians (if there are any) are going to shake their heads in
disbelief. They’ll wonder how, in a
single generation, the world’s oldest democracy dismantled its engine – free,
public, locally controlled, democratic education.
“If they dig into the secretive
process that produced the Common Core State Standards, most of their questions
will be answered.”
I asked my daughter-in-law – a
former teacher who is active in the PTA at her children’s school – what she
thought about Common Core. She told me
basically the same thing that Brady wrote in his article. Teachers do not like Common Core because it
stifles their teaching ability. Teachers
who simply teach to standardized tests are not meeting the needs of individual
students.
Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh, an educator with
experience living under communism in Romania, also wrote about the problems of
Common Core. She shared some history
about the birth of the U.S. Department of Education on October 17, 1979, and
how education in the United States has changed over the past thirty-three
years. “People’s patriotic behavior and
protectiveness of their culture, of their language, of the capitalist system in
general that made them the most prosperous nation on earth, began to erode more
and more overtly. Among the culprits
were teachers who advanced personal socialist agendas to impressionable youth
who believed every word they said.”
Dr. Paugh wrote later in her
article: “Apparently, standardized tests
`fail to produce a valid and reliable measurement of what significant
minorities of students actually know, especially students with disabilities,
English language learners or those from varied cultural backgrounds. Without accurate measurement, accountability
systems are not only ineffective, they are unethical.’ (Core Standards)
“Education must be `collective’
(code word for communism). If students
are not equal, self-esteem is hurt.
Grades and diplomas should be equal for unequal work in order to achieve
social justice in education.
Individualism is discouraged yet it is rugged individualism that has made
this country great.
“Common Core is much worse than
I had envisioned. The American
Principles Project (conservative think-tank) found that Common Core is one
variable in the larger plan to track children from birth to work.
“Michelle Malkin discovered that
the 2009 stimulus package contained a `State Fiscal Stabilization Fund’ offered
to states for a `longitudinal data system (LDS) to collect data on
public-school students’ such as health, family income, religion, and homework.
“Glenn Beck’s The Blaze described a 44-page DOE report
which indicated the possibility of implementing through Common Core monitoring
techniques such as `functional MRIs’ (scanning and mapping a child’s brain
function), `using cameras to judge facial expressions, electronic seats that
determine posture, pressure-sensitive computer mouse, and a biometric wrist
wrap.’
“It will be a fascistic world if
every person will be forced into a government-dictated and enforced,
dumbed-down mold, where everybody is equally intelligent, equally capable,
equally trained, equally able, and equally educated with a diploma on the wall
that is not worth the paper with the fancy intaglio printing on it.”
After studying just a little
about Common Core, I believe it is the progressive/socialist/communist way to
gain control of the rising generation. I
urge parents to become very involved in their children’s education. I suggest that you consider home schooling
your children. If you are not in a
position to do this, I encourage you to be very active in their education. Make sure that you know what your children are
learning and be prepared to counter every bit of indoctrination they receive in
their schools.
No comments:
Post a Comment