Barack Obama and
his administration have attacked the oil and gas industry on several different
occasions while at the same time ensuring the free flow of energy from the
Middle East. When Mr. Obama addressed
the United Nations, he stated, “We will ensure the free flow of energy from the
region to the world…. Although America
is steadily reducing our own dependence on imported oil, the world still
depends on the region’s energy supply, and a severe disruption could
destabilize the entire global economy.”
The irony of this statement is
that Mr. Obama promises to stabilize world oil markets while he discourages oil
and gas production on federal lands. In
fact, the production of oil and gas on federal lands has steadily declined under
his administration while production on state and private lands continues to skyrocket.
“Federal lands produced 31 percent less oil in 2012 than they did in 2011, reports the Energy Information
Administration, while oil production on state and private lands increased by 15
percent. Natural gas production on
federal lands has also fallen dramatically over the years – falling by 33
percent since 2007. Natural gas
production on federal lands now only makes up 15.5 percent of total U.S.
production – down from 24.9 percent in 2009.”
Of course, Mr. Obama claims
credit for the increase of oil and gas production – even though it takes place
on state and private lands and not on lands he controls!
The United States is producing
so much oil and gas now that Saudi Arabia has taken notice. Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal is a nephew of Saudi
King Abdullah and a billionaire businessman. He recently said
that new oil discoveries in the United States and other countries “are threats
to any oil-producing country in the world” and that the issue has become a
“matter of survival” for Saudi Arabia.
Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
has called for a review of
the country’s effective ban on exporting crude oil. This ban was put in place during the oil
crisis of 1973 in an effort to curb price spikes in the United States. Since U.S. oil production is at a record
level, Senator Murkowski “believes that the ban is no longer necessary and only
serves to disrupt supply and slow U.S. production.” She of course has the support of the oil
industry’s leading trade group.
So what happened between the oil
crisis of 1973 and the record level of oil in 2013? Fracking happened. Fracking is the commonly used name for
hydraulic fracturing or fracturing rock by pressurized liquid. “Some hydraulic
fractures form naturally – certain veins or dikes are examples. Induced hydraulic fracturing or hydro
fracturing, commonly known as fracking, is a technique in which typically water
is mixed with sand and chemicals, and the mixture is injected at high pressure
into a wellbore to create small fractures (typically less than 1mm), along
which fluids such as gas, petroleum, uranium-bearing solution, and brine water
may migrate to the well. Hydraulic
pressure is removed from the well, then small grains of proppant (sand or aluminum
oxide) hold these fractures open once the rock achieves equilibrium. The technique is very common in wells for
shale gas, tight gas, tight oil, and coal seam gas and hard rock wells. This well stimulation is usually conducted once
in the life of the well and greatly enhances fluid removal and well
productivity, but there has been an increasing trend towards multiple hydraulic
fracturing as production declines….”
Even though the oil and gas
industry began experiment use with hydraulic fracturing in 1947 and commercial
applications in 1949, fracking became more popular in recent years. George P. Mitchell successfully applied the
method to the Barnett Shale in the 1990s and is now considered to be the modern
“father of fracking.”
“As of 2010, it was estimated
that 60% of all new oil and gas wells worldwide were being hydraulically
fractured. As of 2012, 2.5 million
hydraulic fracturing jobs have been performed on oil and gas wells worldwide,
more than one million of them in the United States.”
Fracking brought the increasing
production of oil and gas and can make the United States oil independent. Proponents of the method point at the
economic benefits; opponents point to potential environmental effects. Fracking will most likely continue to be a
controversy.
I have known about fracking for
a number of years and have even discussed it with numerous people who work in
the industry, but I have never been concerned enough about it to study it in
depth. When I read that Saudi Arabia is
against it, I became a believer in it.
Saudi Arabia uses its vast
wealth from oil production to support its brand of Islam throughout the
world. I believe that the United States
should be oil independent. I am firmly
for this principle. I am also for doing
everything we can do to slow the spread of Islam. For me, this is a wonderful reason to support
continued fracking!
No comments:
Post a Comment