There is a huge
refugee crisis in Europe that no one wants to discuss; neither politicians nor
citizens want to talk about it, and the media does not want to report it. The situation in Europe is actually a global
problem, never previously seen in our time.
It is the biggest migration of people since World War II and has the
portion to cause enormous religious-social problems.
Keith Fitz-Gerald, a market
analyst for more than 30 years of global experience, wrote a commentary
recently about this “elephant in the room.”
He titled his summary “Here’s What No One Understands About the Refugee Crisis in Europe.”
Mr. Fitz-Gerald claims that the
situation could have a good outcome if “adept, intelligent politicians” worked
to “turn social, political, and economic risks into opportunity.” One example for good he gave was the fact
that immigrants have more children; this would raise the overall birth rate and
eventually build up the labor pool. The
highly skilled immigrants start businesses, and those with lower or no skills
take the jobs locals do not want.
“If Europe is to survive, its
self-interested officials have to involve business leaders and private finance in making rapid policy changes. That’s because business leaders are far more
direct than political apparatchiks.
“They will make decisions based
on skills, benefits, and training needs that by their very definition involve a
level of segregation. Critics will call
foul based on the apparent `discrimination,’ much the way they have lined up
against Donald Trump’s position on Mexican immigration. They’re not the same thing.
“One is an economic/humanitarian
need while the other is a security risk.
Countries that have refused to engage abroad are now going to bear the
brunt of that failure. Germany and
America, for example, still do not grasp that inaction has led to direct
battlefield escalation.
“There’s also a corresponding
danger inside Europe itself from sleeper agents using millions of refugees as
cover for hijrah or immigration jihad. Islamic State has openly threatened to flood
Europe with 500,000 fake refugees, and unlike President Barack Obama’s `red
line,’ chances are they mean it.”
Mr. Fitz-Gerald’s article is
very interesting and worth reading. The
European immigration crisis, plus our own illegal immigration problems, should
be an on-going national discussion. We
should be asking questions such as the following: Why should Europe take in the Muslim
immigrants when Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar refuse to take any of
them? What do they know that other
nations should learn? Why should some
countries, such as Greece, Italy, and France, be allowed to act as conduits to
other nations such as Austria, Germany, and Turkey? Do these targeted nations have the right to
close their borders and refuse to allow the immigrants to enter?
Trying to put all this into
proper perspective, Mr. Fitz-Gerald stated that no more than 7,400 refugees per
year were settled in the European Union between 2008 and 2014 entering a
population of approximately 507 million.
The United States has a population of approximately 330 million and
settles an average of 66,000 refugees per year.
Nation in the European Union ordered approximately 516,219 non-citizens
to return home per year.
“The staggering numbers involved
here suggest a sobering truth: Everything
from women’s rights, to law, to intellectual freedom – concepts brought forth
in the Age of Enlightenment dating from the 1620s to roughly the 1780s – is at
risk.”
Why is it a risk? The potentially millions of people will bring
“a massive economic impact at a time when Europe is almost totally unprepared
to handle a rolling parade of desperation.”
Plus these people have admitted that they “are not culturally compatible”
and “are showing very little if any desire to fit in to the millennia-old
civilization Europe enjoys today.”
No comments:
Post a Comment