The topic of
discussion for this Constitution Monday concerns the power of the President of
the United States to restrict immigration from majority Muslim countries.
President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order on Friday, January 27,
2017, titled “Protection of the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the
United States.” It indefinitely suspends admissions for Syrian refugees, limits
the flow of refugees from other nations into the United States, and institutes “extreme
vetting” (Trump’s term) of immigrants.
All persons from terror-prone
countries – meaning Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia – are banned
from entering the United States for 90 days. The U.S. Refugee Admissions
Program was suspended. Only those people who can be properly vetted will be
admitted when the program is reinstated. The order caps at 50,000 the total
number of refugees to be admitted into the U.S. during 2017. It also cancels
the Visa Interview Waiver Program that benefitted repeat travelers to the U.S.
who will now have to have in-person interviews. The order also prioritizes the
claims of refugees who are persecuted for their religion if their religion is a
minority in their country. This would mean that Christians from a Muslim
country would have an easier time entering the U.S. than Muslims in general
would have.
There are already threats of
lawsuits being filed on the grounds that the order is unconstitutional on the
grounds of religious freedom. The so-called experts are divided on the
question. Only time will tell if the order stands or is declared
unconstitutional.
The web site of the Legal Information Institute at the Cornell Law School states the
following about the situation. Any alien is inadmissible
to the United States if a “consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or
has reasonable ground to believe” that the alien will “violate any law of the
United States relating to espionage or sabotage,” “violate or evade any law
prohibiting the export from the United States of goods, technology, or
sensitive information,” “any other unlawful activity,” or “any activity a
purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government
of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means.”
In addition to the above, “any
alien who has engaged in a terrorist activity,” who “a consular officer, the
Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security knows, or has
reasonable ground to believe, is engaged in or is likely to engage after entry
in any terrorist activity,” who “has, under circumstances indicating an
intention to cause death or serious bodily harm, incited terrorist activity,”
who “is a representative of a terrorist organization, a political, social, or
other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity, is a member of a
terrorist organization, has received military-type training from any terrorist organization,
or is the spouse or child of an alien
who is inadmissible if the offense occurred within the past five years.” Example:
“An alien who is an officer,
official, representative, or spokesman of the Palestine Liberation Organization
is considered, for purposes of this chapter, to be engaged in a terrorist
activity.”[Emphasis added.]
This sounds to me to be based on
individuals rather than nations. However, I found these Presidential Proclamations made by President Franklin D. Roosevelt after the attack on Pearl
Harbor. Proclamation #2525 applied to the Japanese, #2526 to the Germans, and
2527 to the Italians, but they were basically the same.
WHEREAS it is provided by Section 21 of
Title 50 of the United States Code [11F. C. A., tit. 50, & sect: 21] as
follows: “Whenever there is a declared war between the United States and any
foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion is
perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United
States by any foreign nation or government, and the President makes public
proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the
hostile nation or government, being of the age of fourteen years and upward,
who shall be within the United States and not actually naturalized, shall be
liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies…”
In 1980 when Islamists took over
Iran during the Islamic Revolution and held Americans hostage, President Jimmy Carter banned Iranians from entering the United States. The only exceptions
were for medical emergencies or opposition to the Shiite Islamist regime. Here
is his Executive Order.
Fourth, the Secretary of Treasury
[State] and the Attorney General will invalidate all visas issued to Iranian
citizens for future entry into the United States, effective today. We will not
reissue visas, nor will we issue new visas, except for compelling and proven
humanitarian reasons or where the national interest of our own country
requires. This directive will be interpreted very strictly.
President Trump has declared on
radical Islamist terrorists, and he did name the nations of Iran, Iraq, Syria,
Sudan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia. I suppose that his Executive Order to ban
radical Islamist terrorists from the named nations could be considered
constitution. Vetting would be required to determine would be terrorists.
No comments:
Post a Comment