Families, communities, and nations are stronger when children receive adequate education. This is the time of year when millions of school children head back to school. However, 2020 is not a normal year, and most parents are faced with many challenges as they seek to find the best school solution for their children.
Some parents have joined the already large numbers of families where children and teens are home schooled. Others are opting for online learning even though their child’s school will have in-person classes. Still others are planning to send their children back to school. According to Kay C. James at The Heritage Foundation, the circumstances are right to adopt school choice.
The good news is, there has never been
another time in America so ripe for school choice. Wouldn’t it make sense if
parents could take a portion of the money that state and local governments
spend to educate their children and use it to seek alternatives – like private
or parochial school, online education, home schooling, co-ops, or other
options?
James continued by reminding her
readers that the taxpayer dollars that are allocated for public education “are
meant for the education of students. As such, those dollars should actually
fund students, not empty school buildings.” She added that states and school
districts “have an obligation to ensure children have access to other
educational opportunities.” She said that the average price per child that taxpayers
pay for K-12 public education is $14,000. If school buildings remain closed,
some of the expenses will disappear – such as janitorial service – and other
costs will be less – such as water, sewer, heat, and electrical. James suggested
that parents should be given an option to use part of the money to fulfil the obligation
to educate students.
School choice seems like an especially critical
option as teachers’ unions across the country protest school reopening.
Unions want schools to remain closed until
their lists of demands are met, yet many of their conditions have absolutely
nothing to do with ensuring the safety of children and teachers during the
pandemic.
Demands include such things as forcing
landlords and banks to cancel rent and mortgage payments for individuals,
keeping private schools closed, and blocking vouchers for school choice.
The demands of a school district in
Los Angeles, California, include keeping schools closed until “Medicare for All”
is passed by Congress, police are defunded, charter schools are closed, and
more housing provided for the homeless. What do any of these demands have to do
with safely reopening schools?
The correct answer is “nothing.”
However, liberals have made clear that they will not let any crisis go to
waste. James recognized that “Some teachers’ unions are shamelessly using
schoolchildren and the reopening of schools as bargaining chips to push their
unrelated social policy agenda.” She said that “True school choice would mean
that parents and students wouldn’t have to be held hostage by political demands.”
James and I agree that the conditions
for reopening schools should center “teacher and student safety and providing
children a quality education.” Political agendas should be put to the side, and
decisions should be “based on the science and a school district’s ability to
consistently follow health and safety protocols.”
Every parent should have a clear
choice as to how to educate their children and to keep them safe from the
coronavirus. If teachers and/or school districts refuse to provide such
education, they should no longer receive funding from taxpayers. We may be able
to strengthen families, communities, and the nation more if we have school
choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment