Families, communities, and nations are stronger when parents teach the importance of work and self-reliance to their children. Work is not only the foundation for self-reliance, but it also builds self-esteem and self-worth. There is absolutely no reason why taxpayers should be taking care of healthy, able-bodied adults without children. However, such people are on the welfare rolls, according to Kevin Corinth.
In
an article published at the Deseret News, Corinth reported that the
unemployment rate in the United States stands at 3.4%, the lowest rate in fifty
years. Even though millions of employers are looking for employees, the Biden
administration eliminated the work requirements for food stamp recipients, thus
encouraging non-working adults to not look for work. Corinth encourages
Congress to look at restoring work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program as they seek ways to curb governmental spending.
Federal law requires that nondisabled
recipients between the ages of 18 and 49 – who do not have children – must work
or volunteer at least 80 hours per month in order to maintain SNAP benefits. At
the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress justifiably suspended these work
requirements as economic activity was shut down and unemployment soared to 14.7%.
The
Biden administration has failed to end the public health emergency even though
three years have passed since the pandemic began. Therefore, work requirements
are not enforced even though workers are needed.
However, ending the public health
emergency will not fully solve the problem. That’s because 18 states and
territories containing 44% of the food stamp caseload have waivers in place
that would prevent work requirements from taking effect even if the public
health emergency ended today. These waivers are intended to protect
beneficiaries when jobs are hard to find in a particular area, but their
implementation suffers from major loopholes.
States qualify for waivers if their
unemployment rates are just modestly higher than the national average – which has
now reached a 54-year low – and they are calculated using out-of-date employment
data. As a result, states with very low unemployment rates are currently
covered by waivers, such as New Jersey (3.4%), Pennsylvania (3.9%), California
(4.1%) and New York (4.3%). Among all states with work requirements waivers,
Nevada is the only one with an unemployment rate above 5%.
The fact that work requirements are not
being enforced when the national unemployment rate is the lowest in over a half
a century defies economic logic. Economists frequently highlight the importance
of tying the generosity of government assistance programs to the state of the
economy. But that doesn’t just mean expanding generosity when jobs are hard to
find. It also means restricting generosity when jobs are easier to come by.
According
to Corinth, there are two big reasons why work requirements should be restored
immediately. The first reason is the cost: “Working-age adults without
disabilities or children drew $5.6 billion annually in food stamp benefits
prior to the pandemic.” The cost is most likely higher now because “food stamp
caseloads have risen and benefit amounts are higher.” Restoring work
requirements would save money to use for more important purposes.
The
second reason is that suspended work requirements interfere with “the Fed’s goal
of stemming inflation without spurring a painful recession.” There is a worker
shortage, which is made worse because the government fails to require
able-bodied adults without children to work. The overall economy is harmed as well as
the individuals who miss the benefits of work. There is no reason why working taxpayers
should pay for benefits for healthy adults without children who are not working
to provide for themselves.
Parents
will prepare their children for adulthood if they teach them the value of work
and how to work. Individuals who know how to work and who are willing to work bring
strength to their families, communities, and nations.
No comments:
Post a Comment