My VIP for this week is Founding Father James Madison. Donald J. Kochan posted an article at The Daily Signal saying that James Madison was the “OG” of DOGE. He explained as follows.
[Last] week in 1788, Madison’s Federalist
No. 62 was published in The [New York] Independent Journal.
The essays we know collectively today as
The Federalist Papers, each authored under the pseudonym Publius by Madison,
Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, have stood the test of time as not only
fundamental to our interpretation of the Constitution, but also to identify the
evils it was designed to guard against.
Federalist No. 62 was directed at a
defense of the proposed Senate composition, election process, and term length.
Madison explained that the features of the
Senate would guard against too voluminous and too frequently changing laws.
While discussing the utility of six-year terms as a way to incentivize
legislators to have a long, reflective view, Madison explained the extended
term would inject stability in the production of law.
It would minimize the inevitable
mutability of laws historically exhibited in systems that the Founders studied
with too constant and frequent change in the personality of the legislature.
Most importantly for today is the
complementary lesson from the essay on what that means for the rule of law.
Put simply, Madison in Federalist No. 62
recognized that the creation of voluminous laws and regulations, a primary
effect of a too mutable set of legislators, “poisons the blessing of liberty
itself.”
And here is where his warnings in 1788
mirror our concerns with the regulatory state today: Reflecting on history and
prescient about the nature of humans and their institutions, Madison’s critical
enduring paragraph in Federalist No. 62 explains the danger.
He wrote: “It will be of little avail to
the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be
so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be
understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo
such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is to-day, can guess
what it will be to-morrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can
that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?”
The "laws” we have today and how they
might apply are little known to Americans when they are buried in an avalanche
of millions of pages of often incoherent regulatory jargon in the Federal
Register that cannot be understood….
No comments:
Post a Comment