The topic of discussion for this Constitution Monday is federal funding of universities. Harvard University is currently in a stand-off situation with the federal government about protection of Jewish students on its campus. Victor Davis Hanson explained the situation as follows.
Harvard
University has rejected various demands of a presidential commission on
antisemitism.
The
task force wants to persuade Harvard to ensure Jewish students on its campus
are no longer harassed, or else lose its federal funding.
Harvard
retorts that it won’t be bullied by Washington.
Among
its other requirements, the Trump administration also warned Harvard to cease
using race as a criterion in its admissions, hiring, and promotion, contrary to
law. And it also directed the campus to ban the use of masks that, in the
post-COVID-19 era of protests, have emboldened violent demonstrators with
anonymity.
The
administration’s order to stop race-based bias was in accordance with civil
rights statutes, and a recent Supreme Court decision specifically banning
affirmative action at Harvard and elsewhere.
No
matter. Harvard claimed that the Trump administration infringed upon its First
Amendment rights.
So,
it has temporarily rejected the administration’s orders. At least for now, Harvard
has lost its annual $2.2 billion grant of federal funds.
Individuals
lauding Harvard’s rejection of federal demands include former President Barack
Obama. They claim that the Trump administration is threatening academic
freedom. Hanson wants to know what academic freedoms about which they are
talking.
…
The freedom to discriminate and segregate by race in hiring, admissions, dorms,
and graduations?
The
freedom of 500 Harvard students to crash the classes of others, shut down traffic,
and harass students on the basis of their religion or views on Israel?
Harvard
is fighting the federal government even as “its classrooms are still being
disrupted” and “Jewish students remain fearful.” Would Obama be defending
Harvard if “African-American students at Harvard were harassed on campus by
masked disrupters? Or black studies classes were crashed by students wearing scarves
over their faces as they vented their hatred?” Would Obama be pressing the
government “to force Harvard to honor federal civil rights protections?’
Harvard has a choice, the same choice that other universities have. Harvard
can use its “largely untaxed endowment of over $50.2 billion” rather than
accept money – a currently suspended amount of $2.2 billion of taxpayer money.
As
explained by Hanson, the federal government is not attempting to tell Harvard
how to run its university. The government is simply saying: if you want to
receive federal money, you “must comply with existing laws and executive
orders.”
Other universities avoid government control by rejecting any government funds. Hillsdale College is one such university. Other universities rejecting all government funding are schools like Brigham Young University and other BYU campuses in Idaho and Hawaii. If Harvard desires to be free of government controls, it should pay its own way.
No comments:
Post a Comment