I believe the ratification
of the Seventeenth Amendment was a huge mistake perpetrated on the United
States by the Progressive movement. This
amendment was ratified on April 8, 1913, approximately 100 years ago in the
beginning of the Progressive transformation of the United States.
The
Founders spent several months writing the Constitution; they organized a system
of many checks and balances. They wanted
the people, states, and federal government to check and balance each other. One of those checks and balances was the
process of electing delegates to the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of
Representatives. They planned for the
Senate to represent the states, and the House to represent the people. This is the reason why the following was written
in the Constitution: “The Senate of the
United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the
Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote”
(Article I, Section 3).
The Seventeenth Amendment
changed this Section of the Constitution to read: “The Senate of the United States shall be
composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for
six years; and each Senator shall have one vote….” This amendment destroyed part of the
federalist structure erected by our Founders to protect the sovereignty of the
States.
Did you notice the
difference? Article I, Section 3 gave power
and authority to the Legislature of each State to elect representatives for
their state in the federal government; the Seventeenth Amendment took this
power and authority from the state and gave it to the people. In other words, this amendment turned the
election of Senators into a popularity contest.
In comparison, the Founders planned for the people to elect delegates to
the U.S. House of Representatives. The
Senate was to represent the states, and the House was to represent the
people. By ratifying this amendment, the
sovereignty of our states was lessened.
The supporters of this amendment
said that the election of Senators by the people would be more democratic than
if they were elected by the state legislature; they also said that the
amendment would cause less corruption and less influence by special influences. They were certainly wrong! This amendment caused even more corruption as
well as “fundamentally transforming our federal government.”
Chris Carter wrote an
interesting article entitled “Georgia state house seeks to repeal the
Seventeenth Amendment.” I found his article to be very informative
and a good history lesson. To begin his
explanation of why the Seventeenth Amendment should be repealed, the author
wrote: “As the Founding Fathers drafted
the Constitution, they understood that free and independent states, fresh from
a long and costly war with England, would not approve of a charter that required
them to totally surrender their sovereignty to a new federal
government. To balance the legitimate
concerns of the states with the need to preserve the union and form a national
government for mutual protection and prosperity, the Founders chose a
federalist system of divided powers between the states and the proposed federal
government.
“They also passed a Bill of
Rights, ensuring that any power not specifically granted to the federal government
rested with the states or the people themselves. The Founders clearly wanted a limited federal
government which was balanced by the state governments.”
The Founders sought to organize
a government that could not be destroyed by man, and they wrote many checks and
balances into the Constitution. They planned
for their new country – the United States of America – to have a government
that was ruled by law and not the rule of man.
They organized a constitutional republic instead of a democracy because
they understood the weaknesses of a democracy.
They understood that people could be convinced to vote for a tyrant who
could destroy the freedoms of both individual and state. I believe that their worst fears were evident
in the re-election of Barack Obama!
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day
O’Connor explained, “The Constitution does not protect the sovereignty of the
States for the benefit of the States or state governments as abstract political
entities. To the contrary, the
Constitution divides authority between federal and state governments for the protection
of individuals. State sovereignty is not just an end to itself.”
The Constitution – as it was
written – provided a system where power and authority of people, states, and
federal government were checked and balanced under a Constitution that was the
Supreme Law of the land, a Constitution that protected all of them.
Former Senator Zell Miller
(D-Georgia) understood how the process was supposed to work and saw the dangers
caused by the Seventeenth Amendment: “Direct
elections of Senators allowed Washington’s special interests to call the shots,
whether it is filling judicial vacancies, passing laws, or issuing regulations.”
Chris Carter further explained, “Government
has always attracted corruption, but political behavior can be managed by
effective political structure. Whether
it’s 1789 or 1913, a government with few checks on its power is far more
corruptible than one that is constrained, and that is the effect that direct
elections of senators had on our government.
“The Founders never intended to
provide the federal government with this much power; if they had, there would
have been no need for enumerated powers – or a Constitution – in the first place. Instead, they anticipated that public
officials wouldn’t preserve federalism for federalism’s sake; they would
instead act in their own self-interest.
State sovereignty persisted not out of virtue, but because public
officials would only retain their position if they served their states.”
I believe that the Seventeenth
Amendment was just one of the steps used by Progressives to destroy our
Constitutional government. I believe
that there is more corruption in our Senate today than there would have been
without this amendment. I believe we
must repeal the Seventeenth Amendment in order to return sovereignty to the
states and to save our Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment