Terrorists and
terrorism have been much in the news since the Boston Marathon was bombed twice
on April 15. The more that we learn
about the two brothers who are alleged to have done the bombing and their
possible connections to a terrorist cell, the more we understand that our
government has let us down again and is undergoing another massive cover-up operation. It looks more and more like Americans
are being scammed by our own government again.
ThomasLifson stated his
belief that the Obama regime is committing national security fraud with its handling
of terrorist attacks. “The Obama
administration sells falsehoods to the public as standard operating procedure,
and most of the time succeeds because the public is ignorant, and the media
uncurious. They are fraudsters, or as I
like to call them, con men. And the
smooth talker-in-chief is a really good one.”
AndrewMcCarthy, expert on
Islamic terrorists and former federal prosecutor, shared several ways that the
regime is committing fraud by planting false ideas in the minds of the America
public in the government’s handling of the younger of the two Boston Marathon
bombers. McCarthy explained the
technicalities of the law and why the telling of untruths to the American
public is fraud.
“Strange,
isn’t it? We are governed by leftists
given to finger-wagging about their commitment to due process and the rule of
law – they’re not like those bad old warmongering Bushies. Still, here we are in the post-arrest phase
of the civilian prosecution the administration was h…-bent on commencing – the
phase when due process obliges government officials to remain mum about
non-public investigative information that could taint the jury pool and
undermine the defendant’s right to a fair trial – and we’re being inundated
with stunning confession evidence.
“Remember,
this is the same crowd that labels the Fort Hood massacre `workplace violence’
and won’t honor its victims with Purple Heart medals. To do so, they sniff, might prejudice the
objectivity of the trial of a jihadist mass murderer who has publicly announced
he’d like to plead guilty. Now, though,
in Tsarnaev’s case, government agencies are leaking like sieves. Why?
“Because
you are being softened up. Steered by
its Gitmo Bar veterans and Lawyer Left compass, the Obama administration is
executing a massive national-security fraud:
the farce that the jihad against America can be judicialized, that
civilian-court processes are a better answer to enemy warfare than are combat
protocols.
“That
is why Eric Holder’s Justice Department, together with the FBI, darted into
federal court in Boston last Sunday evening to file the complaint against
Tsarnaev….
“So
now, the next necessary deception in the campaign is to convince you that …
`the system worked.’ In reality, the
civilian justice system did not work, and that is because it cannot work – not
if the objective is the swift acquisition of vital national-defense
information.”
McCarthy
explained that it is impossible to obtain the necessary intelligence if Miranda warnings are given. He said that the administration has rolled
out three “canards” about this situation.
The first canard is the `public-safety exception.’ “The public is led to believe that this
exception means agents have at least 48 hours of freewheeling interrogation
before Miranda kicks in and the
terrorist clams up upon lawyering up.
This is brazenly false.
“The
public-safety exception is an exceedingly limited end-around. It applies only when arrest is accompanied by
an immediate threat to public safety….
“There
is no 48 hours. The exception ends when
the threat ends – which, in the view of most courts, happens as soon as the
detainee is rendered defenseless.”
The
second canard according to McCarthy is the “judge did it.” The administration intentionally spread the
story about a magistrate judge “barging” into the hospital room to Mirandize
the terrorist and thus ending the interrogation. “This, too, is utter nonsense.”
“As
the Justice Department well knows, the filing of the criminal complaint is the
action that vested the federal court with jurisdiction to act. The moment the complaint was filed, everyone
involved in that decision knew that the rules of criminal procedure mandated a
prompt `presentment’ hearing before a magistrate judge, who would be required
by statute to advise Tsarnaev of his rights to counsel and to stop speaking
with government agents….”
The
third canard recognized by McCarthy is “we learned everything we needed to know
in the Tsarnaev interrogation.
Ridiculous. A competent
intelligence debriefing involves weeks, if not months, of questioning….
“An
intelligence debriefing means following the leads uncovered in the questioning
of the detainee, then repeatedly coming back to the detainee for clarification
and additional insight as new information is discovered. That is not something that can or should be
permitted in the case of a criminal defendant presumed innocent; it is for the
extraordinary case of a wartime enemy operative who is part of the forces
waging jihad against our country.
McCarthy’s
bottom line is that the Obama Administration is committing national security fraud
by lying to the American public. He
wants to know if we are going to fall for the lies.
Representative Tom Cotton questions the policies of the Obama Administration
in preventing terrorist attacks: “I rise
today to express grave doubts about the Obama Administration’s counterterrorism
policies and programs. Counterterrorism
is often shrouded in secrecy, as it should be, so let us judge by the results. In barely four years in office, five
jihadists have reached their targets in the United States under Barack
Obama: the Boston Marathon bombers, the
underwear bomber, the Times Square bomber, the Fort Hood shooter, and in my own
state – the Little Rock recruiting office shooter. In the over seven years after 9/11 under
George W. Bush, how many terrorists reached their target in the United
States? Zero! We need to ask, `Why is the Obama
Administration failing in its mission to stop terrorism before it reaches its
targets in the United States?’”
No comments:
Post a Comment