Freedom of
Religion is one of the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment
to the Constitution of the United States; it is also included in the laws of
other nations. Most Americans are aware of
the guarantee, but many do not understand what it means or why freedom of
religion is important. Freedom of
religion is now being threatened on many sides but especially by the current
American leaders.
Mormonnewsroom.org has numerous
articles about freedom of religion. One
such article is entitled “What Religious Freedom Means.” The article is very interesting and helpful
in defining religious freedom. I learned
some things about freedom of religion from it; I particularly appreciate the
following statement.
“Studies do suggest that most
Americans grasp the basic concept. For
the average citizen, religious freedom is the right enjoyed by many in the free
world to believe the things about God and about moral truth that they choose to
believe, as well as the right to honor those beliefs in worship, if they want
to. Intuitively, this makes sense. It would not be right for someone to be
coerced in matters of religious belief or morality, or prohibited from
worshipping according to their conscience.
“But while these private and
inward activities are vital parts of religious freedom, they do not encompass
the whole of it. Religious freedom is
actually much broader and deeper than this description suggests. More fundamentally, religious freedom – akin
to `freedom of conscience’ – is the human right to think and believe and also
to express and act upon what one deeply believes according to the dictates of
his or her moral conscience. This
freedom applies to those who adhere to religious beliefs and those who do not.
“The full picture of religious
freedom reveals a deep liberty that goes much further than the right to believe
as one chooses and that extends well beyond the right to private devotion in
one’s place of worship or home. Indeed,
religious freedom is not merely interior and private, to be enjoyed internally
in our minds and in the privacy of personal life. It also incorporates the right to act according to one’s moral beliefs and
convictions. And more than the freedom
to worship privately, it is the right to live one’s faith freely and in public.
“Beliefs lead to actions, and
freedom to believe, without the ability to act on that belief within the bounds
of law, is no freedom at all. Most will
agree that moral and religious beliefs don’t mean much if they don’t influence
the way we live. In other words, we
expect religious beliefs to influence the way that people behave, how they
raise families and how they treat others
And indeed, religious freedom protects the right of individuals to act
in line with their religious beliefs and moral convictions. Religious freedom does not merely enable us
to contemplate our convictions; it enables us to execute them.
“Because of this, religion
cannot be confined to the sphere of private life. Certainly religious freedom protects the
rights of individuals to observe their religion within the walls of private
spaces. But religious and moral speech
is also protected in the free air of the public domain. Whether in the town hall, in the newspaper
column, on the Internet or elsewhere in the public sphere, people with moral
convictions are entitled by their religious freedom to share those convictions,
to reason and persuade, and to advocate their vision for society.”
Freedom of religion guarantees
our freedom of conscience and our private beliefs; it also guarantees our right
to discuss and act upon our beliefs openly.
Like our other freedoms, our religious freedom ends where another
person’s starts. We have the right to
discuss our religious beliefs, but other people have the right to decline
hearing them.
Religious freedom was right in
the forefront of the thoughts of millions of Americans this week as the Justices at the U.S.Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday for and
against a controversial Obamacare rule.
Lawyers for Hobby Lobby (owned by the Green family) and Conestoga Wood
Specialties (owned by the Hahn family) argued that a provision in Obamacare
would force them to cover abortion-inducing drugs in the employee health plans
of their employees. Members of these two
families object to this demand based on their constitutionally protected
religious beliefs. The health care mandate
would force religious employers to act against their religious “beliefs or pay
fines as high as $100 per employee per day.”
Adele Keim, a lawyer with the
Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, witnessed the court proceedings as part of
the legal team of Hobby Lobby and spoke about the two cases later at The
Heritage Foundation. “The clients were
front and center, and the sincerity of their religious beliefs. To them, the mandate is tantamount to
providing abortions.”
Greg Scott, spokesman for Alliance
Defending Freedom that represents Conestoga Wood, added, “We agree bosses
shouldn’t be involved in women’s health care decisions – so stop using the
government to get them involved.”
The two cases presented to the
Supreme Court have been widely mischaracterized to be limiting the freedom of
women to buy birth control. This is
untrue. The cases are challenging the
government’s right and power to force Americans – individuals or groups of
individuals called corporations – to violate their religious beliefs. The Green family and the Hahn family are
willing to provide birth control to their employees, but they are fighting
against being forced to pay for abortion-inducing drugs. They are willing to pay for sixteen out of
twenty forms of mandated drugs. The
Justices at the Supreme Court will most likely issue their decision before
June.
The Obama administration believes
Americans have religious freedom in our homes and in our churches; however,
once Americans enter public life – in their businesses, etc. – we lose our
religious freedom. For me and for many
Americans, religion is front and center in our lives every hour of every day of
every week. Because freedom of religion
is so very important to us, we all need to fight to retain it.
No comments:
Post a Comment