The topic of
discussion for this Constitution Monday comes from the First Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution: “Congress shall make
no law ... abridging the freedom of speech….”
This provision gives Americans the right to say whatever they desire –
which is reasonable - without fear of the government punishing them.
“This provision does not in any
way imply that the freedom of speech … [is an] absolute [right]. [It] must
necessarily operate under reasonable restrictions. However, the Founders wanted … regulations
and standards of propriety to be established by the states, not the federal
government.
“On the state level it is
necessary to prohibit freedom of speech in a number of ways. For example, it is not permissible to use
freedom of speech to slander or libel another person. It is also unlawful to cry `Fire!’ in a
crowded auditorium or theater as a practical joke and thereby cause a
panic. There are also restrictions on
where free speech may be exercised if it will attract a crowd and impede the
use of a public thoroughfare or park without prior permission.” (See W. Cleon Skousen, The Making of America – the Substance and Meaning of the Constitution, p.
688.)
Eugene Volokh of The Heritage Foundation asked, “What
exactly did the Framers mean by `freedom of speech’ …? Surprisingly, there is
little definitively known about the subject.
The debates in the First Congress, which proposed the Bill of Rights,
are brief and unilluminating. Early state constitutions generally included
similar provisions, but there is no record of detailed debate about what those
state provisions meant… (The Heritage
Guide to the Constitution, p. 311).
No comments:
Post a Comment