Christian
ministers are now under attack in several cities for their views on
homosexuality, gender identity, and same-sex marriage. It seems that the gay community has become
like the proverbial camel who just wanted to put its nose in the tent. The owner allowed the camel to shield its
nose from the wind-driven sand, but the camel was not satisfied. It then wanted to protect its eyes, then its
ears, and then its entire head. Soon the
entire camel was in the tent, leaving no room for the owner.
It appears that the more
tolerant we are of the “rights” of homosexuals, the more they demand. Is it possible to satisfy all their demands
without destroying traditional marriage and family life – or even freedom of
religion and freedom of speech?
On October 14, 2014, Annise Parker, the first openly lesbian mayor of Houston, Texas, issued
subpoenas demanding that a group of pastors turn over any of their sermons
dealing with homosexuality or gender identity.
The Houston city council approved a new non-discrimination ordinance in
June 2014, and the subpoenas are the “latest twist in an ongoing saga.”
Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF),
a religious liberty law firm, is representing the five pastors and filed a
motion in Harris County Court to stop the subpoenas, calling them “overbroad,
unduly burdensome, harassing, and vexatious.”
The ADF attorney Christina Holcomb stated, “The city’s subpoena of
sermons and other pastoral communications is both needless and unprecedented…. The city council and its attorneys are
engaging in an inquisition designed to stifle any critique of its actions.”
On October 18, 2014, the city of Houston informed the five Christian pastors that they would no
longer have to turn over their “sermons” but would instead have to turn over
their “speeches” to the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance (HERO). HERO apparently includes 17 different
categories of information.
ADF attorney Erik Stanley
stated, “The city of Houston still doesn’t get it. The subpoenas still ask for information that encompasses
speeches made by the pastors and private communications with their church
members.”
Stanley said that the only way
to resolve the problem is for the city of Houston to rescind the
subpoenas. He continued that the legal
action “tramples their First Amendment rights to free speech and the free
exercise of religion. Any inquiry into
what these pastors did in standing against the ordinance passed by the city of
Houston and encouraging members to sign the petition is a violation of the First
Amendment.”
The fiasco began when religious
groups opposed and filed a lawsuit against one of the provisions in HERO that “would
allow men who identify as women to use the restrooms of their choice.” The pastors were leading the opposition to
what is called the “Bathroom Bill” and thus were subpoenaed.
Meanwhile in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, other ministers are under attack for refusing to conduct same-sex
marriages. Donald and Evelyn, husband
and wife and both ordained ministers, run the Hitching Post Wedding
Chapel. City officials told them that
they are required to perform [same-sex wedding] ceremonies or face months in
jail and/or thousands of dollars in fines.
Coeur d’Alene also has a “non-discrimination” ordinance; city officials
claim that ministers have to conduct same-sex marriages because “the courts
have overridden Idaho’s voter-approved constitutional amendment that affirmed
marriage as the union of a man and a woman.”
ADF Senior Legal Counsel Jeremy
Tedesco stated, “The government should not force ordained ministers to act
contrary to their faith under threat of jail time and criminal fines…. Many have denied that pastors would ever be
forced to perform ceremonies that are completely at odds with their faith, but
that’s what is happening here – and it’s happened this quickly. The city is on seriously flawed legal ground,
and our lawsuit intends to ensure that this couple’s freedom to adhere to their
own faith as pastors is protected just as the First Amendment intended.”
Tedesco added, “The government
exists to protect and respect our freedoms, not attack them…. The city cannot erase these fundamental freedoms
and replace them with government coercion and intolerance.”
I expect that my church, The
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, will come under fire some
time. When the U.S. Supreme Court chose
to not hear the gay marriage cases, it also failed to protect traditional
marriage. The Church issued an official statement on October 6, 2014, in response to the Supreme Court non-decision.
“The succession of federal court
decisions in recent months, culminating in today’s announcement by the Supreme
Court, will have no effect on the doctrinal position or practices of The Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which is that only marriage between a man
and woman is acceptable to God. In
prizing freedom of conscience and Constitutional guarantees of the free
exercise of religion, we will continue to teach that standard and uphold it in
our religious practices.
“Nevertheless, respectful
coexistence is possible with those with differing values. As far as the civil law is concerned, the
courts have spoken. Church leaders will
continue to encourage our people to be persons of good will toward all,
rejecting persecution of any kind based on race, ethnicity, religious belief or
non-belief, and differences in sexual orientation.”
The officials in Houston and
Coeur d’Alene are attempting to force Christians to change their beliefs by
jail time or fines. I feel confident
that some people will cave to the pressure, but I know there will be many who
will not conform. When a person knows
the law of God and commits to obedience to it, nothing – including death – will
change that person’s belief.
The government can take away
everything that is dear to a converted Christian and still not change who
he/she is. Consider the case of Nelson
Mandela in South Africa. The government put
him in prison for many years but never changed his beliefs. He came out of prison a stronger person and
earned his nation’s and the world’s respect.
History is full of examples of people who died rather than conform.
We may see more examples of this
type of dedication to God in the near future if we do not stop the tyrannical behavior
before it takes over the “tent” of our nation.
Toleration and respect are important to the unity of a nation, but there
must be a two-way street rather than always going in one direction. I respect all people as children of a living
God and believe that all of us are equal before the law of the land; however,
but I do not and cannot respect the breaking of any of God’s laws. There I will plant my flag and make my stand!
No comments:
Post a Comment