Barack Obama and
members of his administration continue to speak myths about poverty. Stephen Moore of The Heritage Foundation
corrected some of these myths in his article entitled “Unraveling the Poverty Myths Obama Is Promoting.”
One of the myths promoted by Mr.
Obama is a complaint that “folks on the left” are blamed for wanting to “pour
more money into social programs, and don’t care anything about culture or
parenting or family structures….” Moore
pointed out that the federal government has spent more than $22 trillion on the
War on Poverty since 1964.
Another myth promoted by Mr.
Obama is that the Baltimore riots were caused by Republicans who refused to
spend and borrow “even more money on his social programs.”
Moore quoted Mr. Obama: “It is a mistake for us to suggest that
somehow every effort we make has failed and we are powerless to address
poverty. That’s just not true. First of all, just in absolute terms, the
poverty rate when you take into account tax and transfer programs, has been
reduced about 40 percent since 1967.”
Moore then explained, “There are
two problems with this defense of the welfare state. First, the official poverty was falling
before 1965 and at a faster rate than after the Great Society got rolling in
the mid-1960s. This official poverty
rate has remained virtually stagnant since the War on Poverty began.
“Second, the decline in poverty
that Obama is boasting about is only after taking into account tax credits and
government handouts and welfare benefits.
When excluding these programs there has been little progress at all.
“Redistribution may have raised
the material living standards of some of the poor. But it has not increased self-sufficiency.
“The original purpose of the welfare
state was to lift people into self-sufficiency, not to create a permanent
underclass dependent on taxpayers.
Lyndon Johnson told us when he started these programs that `the days of
the dole are numbered.’ We have passed
day 18,000.
“Obama also wants it both
ways. He says over and over, even in
this speech, that the biggest problem with the economy is income inequality
because the rich are getting richer and the poor poorer. So if the poor are getting poorer, how have
his social programs worked to reduce poverty?”
This is a very good
question. How do the social programs
increase self-sufficiency -- and therefore wealth – if the gap between wealthy
and poor continues to grow? The answer
is obvious. The social programs do not
help people; they only continue to keep people on the government plantation!
No comments:
Post a Comment