Early in the
morning on November 9, 2016, Donald Trump was declared President-elect of the
United States because he won more than 270 electoral votes. It does not matter
that Hillary Clinton might have won the popular vote. (I say “might” because I have heard that Trump won the popular vote.)
Immediately after the results of
the election were announced, Change.org published a petition urging members of
the Electoral College to reject the votes of the states and give the election
to Clinton. About the same time, protestors “spontaneously” began marching in
the streets of numerous cities to demand that Clinton be made President.
Several of those marches turned into mobs that began destroying property.
I have personally had a running
discussion with several friends about the Electoral College. Three of those
friends seem to stand on the conservative side and support keeping the
Electoral College. The discussion has been interesting and educational. I
started the discussion by posting a link to this video on Facebook. I encourage you to watch the video to gain greater understanding
of the Electoral College.
A couple of my friends explained
that the Founders divided the powers of the national government. After much
debate the Founders compromised on how the leaders are elected. Each state has
two Senators – no matter how many people live in the state. Each state also has
Representatives elected according to the population of the state. This is an
example: Alaska has three electoral votes while Florida has twenty-nine
electoral votes. A state’s senators and representatives are added together to
make the total number of electoral votes from that state. If the Census, taken
every ten years, finds that population has shifted from out of a state, the
number of representatives are decreased from that particular state and added to
another or others. There are always 100 senators and 435 representatives,
making 535 electoral votes. The District of Columbia has three electoral votes.
This makes a total of 538 electoral votes.
Jarrett Stepman at The Daily
Signal has an interesting article titled “Why We Use Electoral College, Not Popular Vote.” He writes, “The Electoral College
remains in place over two centuries after the framers of the Constitution
empowered it to select presidents. Though occasionally maligned, this system of
electing a chief executive has been incredibly successful for the American
people….
“The Founding Fathers created
the Electoral College after much debate and compromise, but it has provided
stability to the process of picking presidents. Though the winner of the
national popular vote typically takes the presidency, that vote failed to
determine the winner in four elections: 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000 [and
possibly 2016]….”
Stepman quotes Hans von
Spakovsky, a legal expert at The Heritage Foundation, as stating: “In creating
the basic architecture of the American government, the Founders struggled to
satisfy each state’s demand for greater representation while attempting to
balance popular sovereignty against the risk posed to the minority from
majoritarian rule.”
By following the link to the article by Hans von Spakovsky, I found the following information: “Since the 2000 U.S. presidential election,
there have been many ill-informed calls to abolish the Electoral College. Even
before that contentious election, there had been more than 700 proposals
introduced in Congress to amend the Constitution to change the Electoral
College – more than on any other topic.
“The latest scheme, the National
Popular Vote (NPV) plan, is bad public policy. The NPV plan would:
[1]
Diminish the influence of smaller states and rural areas of the country; [2]
Lead to more recounts and contentious conflicts about the results of
presidential elections; and [3] Encourage voter fraud.
“The NPV plan also strikes at
the Founders’ view of federalism and a representative republic – one in which
popular sovereignty is balanced by structural protections for state governments
and minority interests.”
Here is a link to a video about the National Popular Vote (NPV) about doing away with the Electoral College and electing our presidents on
purely popular votes. I encourage you to watch this video. Please note that the
supporters of NPV are more than half-way to their goal.
The Electoral College has worked
for electing our presidents for over 200 years, even as the population has
increased greatly. I see no reason to throw something away that is still
working. Those who want to do away with the Electoral College want to elect our
presidents on a purely popular vote. I believe this is unwise. The Electoral
College helps to make our nation a constitutional republic instead of a
democracy. Adolf Hitler was elected in a democracy, and he was not good for his
country. Democracies destroy themselves in a short period of time while our
constitutional republic has lasted for over 200 years. There is no reason to do
away with the Electoral College.
No comments:
Post a Comment