The topic of discussion for this
Constitution Monday is whether or not it is constitutional to include a citizenship
question on the 2020 U.S. Census. President Donald Trump asked for a
citizenship question to be included on the census, and Democrats went nuts. It
was taken to the courts, and an Obama-appointed judge said that it was
unconstitutional. Another judge refused to block it, and the U.S. Supreme Court
has agreed to review it and have a decision by the end of June 2020. This is
the last possible day for the census forms to be printed.
The President did not ask for
something that has never been done. In fact, there used to be a citizenship question
on the census forms, but the practice was discontinued in 1950. The Democrats
do not want the question on the census because it may decrease their
representatives in Congress. Other people claim that the question would cause
people to not fill out the form. Still others say that it will increase the
cost of the census.
The Department of Justice claims
that they need the question on the census in order to enforce the Voting Rights
Act. If there are more registered voters in a precinct than there are citizens
living in the precinct, it shows that there is voter fraud. It seems to me to
be a legitimate reason for having the question on the census. I cannot imagine
that it is unconstitutional to want to count citizens, but who knows what the
Supreme Court will rule. I am anxious to hear the decision, but I am certainly
not anxious for more liberal temper tantrums.
No comments:
Post a Comment