Why Did Biden Make a Major Speech in Pennsylvania?

             The forensic audit in Arizona is nearly complete, and the one in Georgia is starting. Pennsylvania is making plans to start one also. Democrats must be panicking because President Joe Biden went to Philadelphia to speak in defense of “democracy.” According to Fred Lucas, the President “linked voter ID requirements to repressive Jim Crow laws in the South after the Civil War.”

            For a President who gives few major speeches, Biden declared that it is “not hyperbole” to claim that election integrity laws being passed by numerous states is the worst thing that has happened in this nation since the Civil War. Lucas paraphrased the President proclamation that “his Justice Department would bring civil actions against states because of their election laws and called on Congress to pass legislation to give the federal government control over election administration in the states. Lucas discussed six of Biden’s claims and compared them to the available facts. 

1. “Jim Crow Assault”

“The 21^st-century Jim Crow assault is real. It’s unrelenting, and we are going to challenge it vigorously.”

“We are facing the most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War. That’s not hyperbole. Since the Civil War…. Confederates back then never breached the Capitol as insurrectionists did on Jan. 6. I’m not saying this to alarm you. I’m saying this because you should be alarmed.

The Jim Crow era following the Civil War saw a series of racist laws imposed in the South at the state and local levels for about 100 years. Some of these Jim Crow laws overtly denied blacks the right to vote and, while they lasted into the mid- to late 1960s, arguably amounted to a much more serious threat to democracy than requiring voters to show a photo ID.

Such laws required poll tests and other obstacles for black voters before they could cast a ballot. The laws also restricted employment, housing, and educational opportunities for black Americans.

Schools, parks, recreation facilities, and other public buildings routinely were segregated throughout the South, as were public restrooms and water fountains. The Jim Crow era included terrorist activity by the Ku Klux Klan, a semi-secret society that committed violent and deadly acts against blacks, including lynchings, often with impunity….

2. “Intimidate Voters.”

“In Texas, for example, the Republican state Legislature wants to allow partisan poll watchers to intimidate voters and imperil and impartial poll workers.”

According to news reports, the proposal in Texas would give more autonomy to partisan poll watchers, granting them “free movement” at polling places other than in a voting booth when a voter casts a ballot.

The legislation would make it criminal for an election worker in Texas to obstruct the view of a poll watcher or position him “in a manner that would make observation not reasonably effective.”

Texas law currently allows poll watchers to sit or stand “conveniently near” election workers. It is a criminal offense to prevent them from observing.

 

 

3. “Who Gets to Count?”

“It’s about who gets to count the vote. Who gets to count whether your vote counted at all? … It’s about who gets to count the vote. Who gets to count whether your vote counted at all? … It’s about moving from independent election administrators who work for the people to polarized partisan actors who work for political parties.” …

4. “Make It Harder to Vote.”

“This year alone, 17 states enacted 28 new laws to make it harder for Americans to vote.”

Although numerous states have passed election reforms, it’s not clear that any made it more difficult to vote. The president referred to Georgia and what he called its “vicious anti-voting law.”

Georgia’s law requires a valid identification card for individuals who wish to cast absentee ballots. A voter would need to provide a driver’s license number or other state identification number on the form requesting an absentee ballot.

The law also requires voters to request absentee ballots no later than 11 days before an election. Previously, the law allowed voters to request ballots by the Friday before Election Day, typically four days ahead.

However, Georgia’s new law also allows for expanded early voting, … creating an additional mandatory Saturday and formally codifying Sunday voting hours. Previously, some rural counties didn’t provide for early voting.

Most of the laws passed this year – such as those in Arizona, Florida, Kansas, Kentucky, Iowa, and Montana – prevent the controversial practice of ballot harvesting, require voter ID for absentee ballots, and expand early voting.

5. “Court Case After Court Case.”

“With recount after recount, court case after court case, the 2020 election was the most scrutinized election ever in American history.”

“Challenge after challenge brought to local, state, and election officials, state legislatures, state and federal courts, even to the United States Supreme Court, not once but twice, more than 80 judges, including those appointed by my predecessor, heard the arguments. In every case, neither cause nor evidence was found to undermine the historic achievement of administering the historic election in the face of such extraordinary challenges…. The ‘big lie’ is just that, a big lie.”

On that point, Biden generally was correct. Trump did not win any of his court challenges, including those before federal district court judges he appointed.

However, The Washington Post noted that many of the cases were not heard, with courts instead citing a lack of legal standing.

As for Biden’s reference to the Supreme Court, it did not hear a case regarding the results of the presidential election. But the justices determined that Republican state attorneys general lacked standing to challenge closely contested courts in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

The high court also opted not to hear a case involving election procedures in Pennsylvania.

6. Supreme Court “Weakened Voting Rights Act.”

“… the Supreme Court once again weakened the Voting Rights Act.”

“The court’s decision – as harmful as it is – does not limit the Congress’ ability to repair the damage done…. It puts the burden back on Congress to restore the Voting Rights Act to its intended strength.”

The high court ruled 6-3 in the case of Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee to uphold a law preventing ballot harvesting and requiring residents to vote in their home precinct. The high court did not weaken the Voting Rights Act, as the president said, but determined that two provisions of Arizona state law in question did not violate it.

One requirement specifies that a ballot cast by someone on Election Day will not be counted if cast outside of that person’s assigned precinct. The other stipulates that only an election official, mail carrier, or a voter’s relative, household member, or caregiver may collect and deliver someone else’s mail-in ballot.

            Democrats know that the 2020 presidential election was not fair and integral. They know what information will come out in a forensic audit. If the election were fair, they would support audits. The audits are being done to determine what happened during the election, something that every American should support.