The topic of discussion for this Constitution Monday concerns impeachment of the President of the United States. Article II, Section 4 states “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
With
the above noted section, the U.S. Constitution gives to Congress the authority
to impeach and remove various civil officers from office for “treason, bribery,
or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
The
power of impeachment given to Congress is an essential check on the Executive
and Judicial Branches to stop violations of the law and power abuses. Three
Presidents have been impeached in the past – Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton, and
Donald Trump – but none of them were removed from office.
The
two impeachments of Trump have been called into question by evidence that came
out in recent months. The first impeachment was for questioning the President
of Ukraine about Biden family corruption, and now a Republican-led Congress is
amassing bank records, emails, and other items showing that members of the
Biden family were selling the Biden name to foreign nationals – corruption. The
investigation is continuing, but the evidence indicates that there is a
connection to Joe Biden.
According
to Tyler O’Neil at The Daily Signal, House Judiciary Committee Chairman
Jim Jordan recently issued the 60th subpoena issued during the
impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden. This subpoena went to Lesley Wolf
– assistant U.S. attorney for Delaware – demanding that she testify before the
committee. The date set for her testimony is December 7 at 10 a.m. in
Washington, D.C. O’Neil continued with the following information.
Jordan explained in a letter to Wolf that
the Judiciary Committee considers her testimony essential to its oversight of
the “executive branch’s commitment to impartial justice” and to “whether
sufficient grounds exist to draft articles of impeachment against President
Biden.” The Justice Department under Biden twice refused to make Wolf available
for a voluntary interview, leaving the committee “no choice but to compel your
testimony at a deposition.” …
Republicans have accused Wolf of impeding
the Delaware U.S. attorney’s investigation into Hunter Biden’s alleged
influence peddling. Republicans note that Hunter Biden handsomely benefitted
from lucrative business deals in China, Ukraine, and elsewhere while his
father, then the vice president to President Barack Obama, served as the
administration’s point-man for those countries.
Democrats, meanwhile, have claimed that
there is no evidence the president directly benefited from his son’s foreign
business deals. President Biden has denied any wrongdoing on his part or on the
part of his son.
“Witness testimony and public reporting
indicates that as an assistant U.S. attorney for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for
the District of Delaware, you were directly involved in that office’s
investigation of Hunter Biden, which deviated from standard investigative
procedures,” Jordan notes in the letter.
O’Neil
reported that Jordan’s letter cites whistleblower testimony, “noting that Wolf ‘attended
a substantial majority, if not all, of the prosecution team meetings concerning
the [Justice] Department’s investigation of Hunter Biden.” His article includes
more information from Jordan’s letter.
No comments:
Post a Comment