What Is the Situation with Ilhan Omar?

Under the principles of the U.S. Constitution, all American citizens live under the same rules. Democrats used the refrain “no one is above the law” to justify the illegal treatment of Donald Trump. Now one of their own is being treated the same as the Left treated Donald Trump and numerous supporters of him. David Harsanyi reported on the situation in his article published at the Daily Signal. 

One of the foundational ideals of a free nation is that all its citizens live under the same rules. Democrats know this. They’ve been lecturing us for years that “no one is above the law.”

So, what happens if a federal investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., provides incontrovertible evidence that she obtained citizenship by lying? Should we ignore it? Should Omar be given an exemption from the law because she’s in Congress? Or because she’s a Democrat?

Those on the left carping about the investigation into Omar being politically motivated can’t be taken seriously. Not after they spent a decade engaged in blatant lawfare – first by attempting to annul the 2016 election of Donald Trump by concocting one lurid conspiracy theory after the next, and then by trying to stop him from running for the presidency in 2024.

When you spend your time stripping away norms, you can’t expect the other side to unilaterally disarm.

The New York Times reported that the court and the Justice Department debated the warrant to search Omar’s residences for weeks before it was finally issued. Courts are in a separate branch of government for an important reason, and they should be highly suspicious of any case that appears to involve abuse of the legal system for political reasons.

But the fact that a Biden-appointed U.S. magistrate judge in Washington, D.C., believed there was probable cause for a raid tells us that there is at least something worth investigating. Or, as Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif. once said, before “a grand jury indicts anyone, they need evidence. Searches are a way to get evidence. Get it?” We do.

There are two issues at hand. The more serious one is whether Omar’s father obtained his citizenship by lying about both himself and his daughter.

Nur Omar Mohamed brought his Somali family members from a refugee camp in Kenya in 1995. The late patriarch’s story about fleeing persecution looks dubious. Indeed, he may well have been a soldier loyal to Somali dictator Siad Barre and a participant in the persecution.

More pertinently, he or his daughter may have lied about Ilhan’s age on immigration documents when he was naturalized in 2000. “I became a citizen actually before I turned 18,” Omar said in a 2018 interview. “My father became a citizen and so I got my citizenship through that process.”

As a 17-year-old minor, Omar was automatically given citizenship. If, in reality, she was 18 or 19, she would have been compelled to go through the naturalization process herself.

Under the law, even a child who derived citizenship through a parent could lose that status if the parent concealed or willfully misrepresented facts to obtain naturalization. And the fact that Omar’s staff appears to have changed the congresswoman’s date of birth after her election in 2019 could also suggest that she knew about the discrepancy.

The Wall Street Journal reports that all of this is aimed at building a case to strip Omar of her U.S. citizenship and ultimately deport her. Until the Trump administration, the crime of willfully lying during the process of obtaining citizenship had rarely been prosecuted at all, which is a shame.

Stripping an American of citizenship should be treated as an extraordinarily serious matter. The problem is that we haven’t been very serious when handing out citizenship.

If Omar gained her citizenship by lying, she, at the very minimum, should not be serving in Congress.

The other ongoing investigation concerns whether Omar inflated her net worth on congressional forms. In her disclosures filed in 2025, Omar reported that she and her husband, Tim Mynett, were worth between $6 million and $30 million, an impressive jump from $15,000-$51,000 the year before. Omar later amended her disclosure to claim that her household’s net worth was between $18,004 and $95,000.

It is unclear why Omar would lie or whether there is any underlying criminal act being investigated, but how plausible is it that a 40-something, college-educated congresswoman doesn’t know whether she is worth $30 million or $95,000?

You might recall that New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a civil fraud lawsuit against Trump, claiming that his companies had fraudulently inflated their net worth. At the time, congressmen like Mondaire Jones pointed out that “no one is above that law, not even the former president of the United States and his crime family.”

Would Omar have been targeted if she weren’t in Congress? Probably not. Does that make her innocent? Hardly.

From my point of view, the argument that Omar would not be targeted if she were not in Congress is mute. Donald Trump would not have been targeted if he did not run for President of the United States. All of it would have gone away if he had been content to be a New York businessman. Also, I am quite certain that I would have known the difference between $30 million and $95,000.

  

Who Is Pope Leo XIV?

My VIP for this week is Cope Leo XIV, leader of the Catholic Church. There are two reasons for choosing him: (1) He holds a prominent position in the world and (2) his lung cancer.

According to an article by Lois M. Collins, Pope Leo XIV’s lung cancer diagnosis and surgery remind everyone of the dangers of lung cancer. Here are her three points to remember: (1) People who haven’t smoked can develop lung cancer. (2) Early detection can make a major difference. (3) Often there are no early symptoms of lung cancer. The article continued as follows. 

Friday, Dr. John Stringham, an Intermountain Health thoracic and oncology surgeon, briefed the media on other risk factors.

The American Cancer Society estimates just under 125,000 people die from lung cancer each year in the U.S., including smokers, former smokers and people who never smoked. While smoking is still responsible for most cases, between 15% and 20% of lung cancer cases are found in people who have never smoked, according to a 2025 JAMA study. [One of my brothers-in-law was not a smoker, but he had lung cancer.]

The pope’s cancer, which was pulmonary adenocarcinoma – a common form of non-small cell lung cancer – was found at the early stage and biopsied during surgery so those treating him said they were able to remove the lower lobe of his right lung.

It’s likely the surgeon removed nearby lymph nodes to make sure it hadn’t spread, as well, said Stringham, who was not involved in the pope’s treatment. He said reports suggest that surgery is likely the only treatment he will need. When cancer has spread to lymph nodes, “then we usually do talk about chemotherapy, sometimes radiation for those folks.”

In cases where the cancer is contained, Stringham said there’s an estimated 80% to 90% cancer-specific survival rate at five years. When lung cancer has metastasized, which means it spread to other parts of the body, the survival rate at the five-year benchmark drops.

Stringham also noted that the pontiff, who is 71, is physically active and known to swim and play tennis. “Most likely he’s going to have a good recovery if everything goes according to plan,” though he’ll be monitored. “most likely he’ll be going through CT scans for at least five years to make sure nothing comes back,” the doctor said.

Detected early, the recurrence rate is “actually pretty low,” he said. And those patients “recover from lung cancer surgery pretty well and pretty easily. I definitely have had patients where we take out a lower lob and t hey have gone on to do marathons, for example.”

About lung cancer and risks

But there’s a lot to know about lung cancer, which often is not diagnosed until it is much more advanced than that of the pope. Early cases are usually detected – as they were in his case – through an imaging test for something else.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the world, including in the U.S. Stringham said lung cancer is divided into two categories: small ell and non-small cell. Small cell lung cancers are more aggressive and spread more quickly, while non-small cell cancers are most typical and also more treatable.

The two main types of non-small cell are squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma – Pope Leo’s diagnosis – which is the most common among nonsmokers with lung cancer. Early-stage non-small cell lung cancers are typically treated with surgery as the mainstay, he said. A lobe is removed. If it had spread, there are other treatments that are “becoming more and more effective” due to better technology and better understanding of cancer. Early-stage non-small cell lung cancers are typically treated with surgery as the mainstay, he said. A lobe is removed. If it had spread, there are other treatments that are “becoming more and more effective” due to better technology and better understanding of cancer. It’s possible to look at the actual molecules cancers are expressing and use those molecules against them with immunotherapy, among other options.

Stringham urged smokers to stop smoking now and to stop “putting things in your lungs that shouldn’t be there.” However, there are other risks, including “secondhand smoke, exposure to substances such as solvents, chemicals, radon, and pollution.

“There are also genetic factors for lung cancer, including inherited mutations that pass down through the family.” Vaping is also a risk factor for lung cancer. Stringham suggested “wearing respiratory protection when working around pollutants, chemicals and irritants and keeping the area well ventilated. One should also “take care of yourself: exercise, eating well, seeing a doctor and other typical well-being advice all help ensure a person is as healthy as possible.

Detection and prevention

One of the challenges with lung cancer is that symptoms don’t really show up early. “Very often, lung cancer really doesn’t have any symptoms whatsoever,” according to Stringham, who noted maybe a cough sometimes or some sputum production. “But often it’s really quite asymptomatic until you actually get to a much higher stage….

When lung cancer spreads, it most often goes to lymph nodes in the middle of the chest, then outwards, though not always. After that, it can go “pretty much anywhere in the body,” he said, noting the spine and brain are not uncommon. Sometimes, it doesn’t go to the lymph nodes but does spread elsewhere….

Screening for smokers and former smokers

Lung cancer screening is now recommended for smokers and former smokers, using low-dose CT scan to make sure there are no nodules.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends annual screening for adults ages 50-80 with at least a “20 pack-year” smoking history who currently smoke or quit within the past 15 years. That means 20 cigarettes a day for 20 years or an equivalent amount.

It’s not recommended for others, who “don’t qualify for it at this time.” …

Will U.S. Totally End Birth Tourism?

The topic of discussion for this week concerns birth tourism. Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell explains the latest action taken by the Trump administration. “Trump’s Birth Tourism Prevention Task Force has revoked more than 700 visas held by Chinese nationals since its launched in August. 

“The Chinese birth tourism industry should not be allowed to profit from the privileges of American citizenship while undermining the integrity of our immigration laws,” a State Department spokesperson told the Daily Signal. “President Trump and Secretary Rubio are putting American interests first, strengthening enforcement, and making clear that the United States will not tolerate the deliberate exploitation of its visa process.”

The State Department established a task force to identify instances of birth tourism, revoke visas of those who engage in or facilitate it, and dismantle the networks that profit from it.

The task force’s largest crackdown has been on Chinese nationals accused of exploiting the immigration system to obtain U.S. citizenship for their children, according to the spokesperson. “We will not allow foreign nationals or commercial networks from any country to abuse our visa process for financial gain,” the spokesperson said.

More than 107 Chinese-owned surrogacy agencies operate in Southern California alone. Chinese nationals often pay women living in the United States more than $50,000 to serve as surrogates. Conventional birth tourism results in an estimated 50,000 to 100,000 annual U.S. births to Chinese nationals, according to investigative journalist Peter Schweitzer’s Senate testimony.

Surrogacy cycles commissioned by foreign intended parents surged 78% from 2014 to 2019, from 2,758 to 4,905 embryo transfers a year. Chinese nationals were the largest customer base at 41.7%, according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine’s journal.

            “American citizenship is not for sale and President Trump has been unequivocal that his                        Administration will protect the meaning and value of American citizenship,” Eddie Vasquez,                    deputy assistant secretary for press, said. “At the State Department will use all the available                    tools to dismantle birth tourism networks and defend the integrity of U.S. citizenship. We are                seeing that promise and our actions speak for themselves. 

How Are You Preparing for the Second Coming of Jesus Christ?

My Come Follow Me studies for this week took me to Isaiah 58-66 in a lesson titled “The Redeemer Shall Come to Zion.” The following information introduced the lesson. 

Early in His ministry, Jesus Christ visited a synagogue in Nazareth, where He was raised. He stood there to read from the scriptures, opened the book of Isaiah, and read what we now know as Isaiah 61:1-2. He then announced, “This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.” This was one of the Savior’s most straightforward declarations that He was the Anointed One, who would “heal the brokenhearted” and “preach deliverance to the captives” (see Luke 4:16-21). This scripture was indeed fulfilled on that day. And, like many other prophecies of Isaiah, it is also being fulfilled in our day. The Savior continues to heal the brokenhearted who come unto Him. There are still many captives who need deliverance. And there is a glorious future to prepare for – a time when the Lord will “create new heavens and a new earth” (Isaiah 65:17) and “cause righteousness and praise to spring forth before all the nations” (Isaiah 61:11). Reading Isaiah opens our eyes to what the Lord has already done, what He is doing, and what He will yet do for His people.

The scripture block teaches several principles, including the following: (1) Fasting builds spiritual power and blesses people in need (Isaiah 58:3-12). (2) Honoring the Lord on the Sabbath brings joy (Isaiah 58:13-14). (3) Jesus Christ is my Savior and Redeemer (Isaiah 59:9-21; 61:1-3; 63:7-9). (4) “The Lord shall be unto thee an everlasting light” (Isaiah 60; 62). (5) Christ will reign on earth during the Millennium (Isaiah 64:1-5; 65:17-25; 66). This essay will discuss principle #5 about Christ reigning during the Millennium.

Isaiah spoke of a day when “the former troubles are forgotten” (Isaiah 65:16). While this prophecy has several fulfillments, in its fullest sense, that day is yet to come – when Jesus Christ will return. Isaiah described this future day in Isaiah 64:1-5; 65:17-25; 66. Isaiah often used words like “rejoice” and “rejoicing.” The Savior’s return will be a day of rejoicing for those who are prepared for His coming.

President Russell M. Nelson spoke about preparing the world for the Second Coming of the Savior in the April 2020 General Conference (“The Future of the Church: Preparing the World for the Savior’s Second Coming,” Ensign, April 2020, 13-17). 

The choice to come unto Christ is not a matter of physical location; it is a matter of individual commitment. All members of the Church have access to the doctrine, ordinances, priesthood keys, and blessings of the gospel, regardless of their location. People can be “brought to the knowledge of the Lord” (3 Nephi 20:13) without leaving their homelands.

True, in the early days of the Church, conversion often meant emigration as well. But now the gathering takes place in each nation. The Lord has decreed the establishment of Zion (see Doctrine and Covenants 6:6; 11:6) in each realm where He has given His Saints their birth and nationality…. Zion is “the pure in heart” (Doctrine and Covenants 97:21). It is wherever righteous Saints are. Spiritual security will always depend upon how one lives, not where one lives. I promise that if we will do our best to exercise faith in Jesus Christ and access the power of His Atonement through repentance, we will have the knowledge and power of God to help us take the blessings of the restored gospel of Jesus Christ to every nation, kindred, tongue, and people and to prepare the world for the Second Coming of the Lord….

Do whatever it takes to strengthen your faith in Jesus Christ by increasing your understanding of the doctrine taught in His restored Church and by relentlessly seeking truth. Anchored in pure doctrine, you will be able to step forward with faith and dogged persistence and cheerfully do all that lies in your power to fulfill the purposes of the Lord.

Which Is More Important – Quality Time or Quantity Time – in a Family?

Families are strengthened by investing in both quality time and quantity time together. Wise parents recognize that family time matters, and “elements of both quality and quantity time” are essential to create a strong family. An article from Focus on the Family shares these important ideas.

If you’re asking us whether family time really matters, we’d have to say yes. In fact, family time is so important that it shouldn’t be reduced to an either-or proposition. It has to incorporate elements of both quality and quantity.

Quantity time creates a safe environment where youngsters can feel accepted and valued for who they are. It communicates availability and fosters a sense of security. It establishes a solid home base from which children can launch out into the world with confidence and strength.

Quality time, on the other hand, is essential to the process of family bonding. It’s the stuff of which relationships are made. It’s the polished gem that caring parents fashion from the raw material of moments, hours, and days spent together. The thing to note is that it’s difficult to have one without the other. The more family time we create, the more opportunities we have to touch each other’s lives in profound ways. You can’t seize [this] if you’re not there to do the seizing. It isn’t always possible to cram meaningful memories and life-changing conversations into a few minutes of contrived quality time.

None of this happens automatically, of course. It’s entirely possible for a family to spend lots of time together and come away the worse for it. This is especially true if their interactions are marred by constant strife, anxiety, or abuse. The key to success is intentionality. That means making up your mind to be present in the moments and to make the most of every circumstance.

Contemporary marriages and families lack time – quality and quantity – for a number of reasons. An endless pursuit of material things requires increasing amounts of money. This translates into more hours at work. Busyness creates fatigue and deflects attention from pressing relational issues. Couples “grow apart” as their lives travel down separate but parallel tracks. Moms and dads model a task-oriented mentality that communicates an unmistakable message to their kids: take care of your duties and obligations first. Then feel free to retreat into your own (electronic) stimulation, recreation, or leisure-time activity (read: “isolation in your own room”).

If you want to escape this numbing pattern, you may need to revamp your schedule. We suggest you engage in some serious lifestyle planning. Go back to Square One. Revisit your basic values and priorities. Resolve to make some countercultural choices and decisions if necessary. Take steps to reduce your outside commitments and block out weekly family time on the calendar.

In particular, don’t worry about how it looks to “other people” if you limit yourselves to one or two selections from a long list of worthwhile church activities. Resist the temptation to sign your kids up for numerous sports teams, music and dance lessons, social clubs, and all kinds of community organizations. One activity per season per child [may be] more than enough. Carve out spaces and create margins. Don’t be afraid of “voids.” Agree to turn off all communications devices at certain times of the day or on certain days of the week. Instead of watching TV, read together, play board games, take a walk to a local park, or sit and talk. Get into your kids’ space. Hang out with them and find out what excites them. This is all part of the process of turning quantity into quality time.

Meanwhile, don’t forget to take full advantage of simple everyday interactions. Drive time, mealtime, meal preparation, bath time, bedtime – all can become opportunities for shared discoveries and precious, unforeseen, and unique conversations between parent and child. It’s a matter of learning to savor life’s ordinary moments. Most children find just as much, or even more, joy in the little things as they do in life’s big events. Activities like eating a special breakfast of chocolate-chip pancakes, picking out the perfect backpack for the first day of school, or singing silly songs in the car could turn out to be some of the most memorable highlights of your kids’ childhood years.

Will Democrat Party Reject Islamic Terrorism and Socialism?

The liberty principle for this Freedom Friday concerns the increasing numbers of Americans who are embracing Islamic terrorism and socialism. Trump Derangement Syndrome, “Democrats’ hatred for President Donald Trump,” and “an effort to defeat Republicans in November” are leading the increase.

Justin Murphy, the Republican nominee for New Jersey’s Senate seat, explained the situation in his interview with the Daily Signal. 

“Their [Democrats] hate for Donald Trump is the only thing that is informing their decision making,” Justin Murphy told the Daily Signal. “Their hate for Donald Trump is more important to them than their love of this country, if they even have it.”

“It’s more important for them to make sure they do not … appear to their base that they’re working with President Trump, because that’s absolutely forbidden,” he continued.

Murphy said that hatred of the president is “keeping them isolated from the American people” and is “the only thing they are campaigning on.”

The candidate’s remarks come after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called his party a “big tent” that welcomes all voters.

Additionally, at least five members of the Democratic Socialists of America, a progressive organization that aims to dissolve constitutionally designated institutions such as the Senate, could be sworn into Congress in January.

“The Democrat Party today is no longer the party of FDR – the World War II, Depression-era Democrat. They’re no longer the party of JFK. It’s now the party of the DSA, and they’re no longer the party of the kind of little guy, the blue-collar worker, the northeastern Catholic voter,” Murphy added.

Murphy, using the example of the Republican Party’s rejection of David Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard who tried to run for president as a Republican in the 1990s, contrasted his party’s handling of radical antisemites and extremists to that of the Democrats.

“We zipped up our tent, shut the door, threw him out of the party, and told him you get no name from the Republican Party and get no recognition. He was not allowed to run in our primaries, and we tossed him out of the party,” he said.

Murphy argued that if the Democratic Party was the party of “tolerance and civility” as is sometimes claimed, Democrat leaders would “do the same” toward their radical members.

Murphy’s opponent, Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., has not yet condemned his party’s radical candidates. 

Articles of Faith: What Do Latter-day Saints Believe About the Atonement of Jesus Christ? 6

                                                                     Article of Faith 3

We believe that through the Atonement of Christ, all mankind may be saved,

by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel.

This is the sixth essay about the Atonement of Jesus Christ as stated in the third Article of Faith of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The first week, I discussed the importance of understanding how the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ, as the third pillar of eternity, is essential to Heavenly Father’s plan for the eternal happiness of His children. The second week, the discussion was about the Atonement of Jesus Christ and the nature of the atonement. The third week, the discussion concerned the Atonement of Jesus Christ as a vicarious sacrifice. The fourth week, the discussion was about Christ’s sacrifice being voluntary and love inspired. Last week, the discussion was about the Atonement being foreordained and foretold. The discussion for this week will use the words of Elder James E. Talmage to discuss the extent of the Atonement (Articles of Faith [1913], 85-87).

The Extent of the Atonement is universal, applying alike to all descendants of Adam. Even the unbeliever, the heathen, and the child who dies before reaching the years of discretion, all are redeemed by the Savior’s self-sacrifice from the individual consequences of the fall. It is proved by scripture that the resurrection of the body is one of the victories achieved by Christ through His atoning sacrifice. He Himself proclaimed the eternal truth: “I am the resurrection, and the life”; and He was the first of all men to rise from the grave to immortality – “the firstfruits of them that slept.” The scriptures leave no room for doubt concerning the fact that the resurrection will be universal. The Savior announced to His apostles the beginning of this work of deliverance from the tomb; hear His words: “Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation” or, as the latter part of the declaration has bene rendered through inspiration in the present day, “They who have done good in the resurrection of the just, and they who have done evil in the resurrection of the unjust.”

Paul preached the doctrine of a universal resurrection: “That there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust.” On another occasion he wrote: “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.” John the Revelator testifies of his vision concerning futurity: “And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them.” Thus it is plain that the effect of the atonement, so far as it applies to the victory over temporal or bodily death, includes the entire race. It is equally clear that the release from spiritual death, or banishment from the presence of God, is offered to all; so that if any man lose salvation such loss will be due to himself, and in no way be the inescapable effect of Adam’s transgression. That the gift of redemption through Christ is free to all men was specifically taught by the apostles of old. Thus Paul says: “Therefore as by the offense of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.” And further: “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all.” John spoke of the Redeemer’s sacrifice, saying: “And he is the propitiation for our sins; and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.”

The same truths were taught among the Nephites. Benjamin, the righteous king, preached of “the atonement which was prepared from the foundation of the world for all mankind, which ever were since the fall of Adam, or who are, or who ever shall be, even unto the end of the world.” In revelation of the present day we read of Christ’s having come into the world, to suffer and to die: “That through him all might be saved whom the Father into his power and made by him.”

But besides this universal application of the atonement, whereby all men are redeemed from the effects of Adam’s transgression both with respect to the death of the body and inherited sin, there is application of the same great sacrifice as a means of propitiation for individual sins through the faith and good works of the sinner. This twofold effect of the atonement is implied in the article of our faith now under consideration. The first effect is to secure to all mankind alike, exemption from the penalty of the fall, thus providing a plan of General Salvation. The second effect is to open a way for Individual Salvation whereby mankind may secure remission of personal sins. As these sins are the result of individual acts it is just that forgiveness for them should be conditioned on individual compliance with prescribed requirements – “obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel.”

  

Will Americans Accept Socialism

Socialism is raising its ugly head in the United States. Democratic Socialists of America are being elected as members of Congress. Rep. Warren Davidson is raising a warning voice. He “witnessed life in East Germany just weeks after the Berlin Wall fell in 1989.” It is entirely possible that he could find himself serving Congress with “Democrats who embrace an ideology millions of Eastern Europeans rejected when they tore the wall down.”

In his article published in The Daily Signal, Robert B. Bluey shares the information that he learned in his interview with Davidson. 

Ideas once associated with the Left’s fringe are increasingly entering the American political landscape. Several members of Congress already proudly identify as democratic socialists, and a new crop of candidates aligned with the Democratic Socialists of America could soon join them. For Davidson, an Ohio Republican and constitutional conservative, that’s a difficult reality to accept.

After graduating from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, Davidson enlisted in the U.S. Army as an infantryman. While stationed in Germany in 1989, he made the trek to see how East Germans were reacting to the collapse of communism.

“The people in East Germany found it out the truth. They tore their own wall down,” Davidson told the Daily Signal. “You go from that experience where I’m seeing firsthand how failed these ideas are, to I’m serving in Congress with people that describe themselves as socialists.”

Voters Focused on Affordability, Immigration

Davidson has spent recent weeks back home in Ohio’s 8^th District meeting with constituents ahead of Election Day. While national political debates often dominate Washington, he said voters remain focused on issues much closer to home.

“Affordability still is a big issue,” Davidson said on the Daily Signal’s “Midterm Report” podcase. “People are talking a lot about affordability. Gas prices is one of the big things.” He said concerns about government corruption and border security also frequently arise in conversations with constituents….

Manufacturing, China, and the Surveillance State

Before his election to Congress in 2016, Davidson worked in manufacturing for about 15 years. He argues that decades of trade policy weakened America’s industrial base and harmed working-class communities.

“Ross Perot said that if you do these trade deals with China and Mexico, you’re going to hear a giant sucking sound of our jobs leaving America,” Davidson said. “With the benefit of hindsight, he was right.”

Davidson contends that China’s government has gained an unfair advantage through subsidies and market manipulation….

The congressman has also been vocal about privacy and government surveillance. As a co-sponsor of legislation aimed at limiting Chinese access to vehicle data, he said Americans should have greater control over their personal information….

A Lesson From East Germany

Davidson’s concerns about socialism are rooted in personal experience.

While serving in the U.S. Army, he was stationed in Germany during the final years of the Cold War. Just weeks after Germans demolished the Berlin Wall, Davidson saw firsthand what life under socialism and communism had produced.

“They were like, ‘Is it like this everywhere?’” Davidson recalled. “there was fresh milk and everyone could go buy things.”

Many East Germans had been taught that life in the West was worse than life behind the Iron Curtain.

“They were told that we were more poor than them,” Davidson said. “I’m like, ‘Well, buddy, obviously you’ve been lied to.’”

The experience left an enduring impression on the future congressman.

Socialism’s Return

Today, many younger Americans don’t think the same way as Davidson. Socialism is growing in popularity – 43% have a positive view, according to Gallup’s polling in September.

Among those between the ages of 18 and 34, socialism’s popularity is 57%, Gallup reported. By comparison, 43% of that age group views capitalism positively.

“A lot of young people weren’t around for the Cold War,” Davison surmised.

Davidson worries that many Americans lack an understanding, of socialism’s historical failures. He pointed to New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani as a socialist leader who has inspired followers.

“People are copying his platform and getting support from the political Left in the United States,” Davidson said.

Quoting President Ronald Reagan, Davidson added, “Freedom’s never more than one generation away from extinction.”

           As more candidates openly embrace socialism, Davidson hopes Americans will look to history               before embracing ideas that millions of people once rejected at great personal cost.

Who Is Columbus?

My VIP for this week is Christopher Columbus because October 12, 2026, is Columbus Day. Today marks the 534^th anniversary since Columbus made landfall in the Americas on October 12, 1492. Columbus’s fleet, consisting of the Nina, Pinta, and Santa Maria had sailed from Palos, Spain, more than a month earlier.

A lookout aboard the Pinta sighted land on the night of October 11, 1492, and shouted “Land” early in the morning on October 12. That morning, Columbus and his crew landed on a small island known to Lucayan Taino people as Guanahani, which he renamed San Salvador. This is the first known contact from Europe with the Americas, and it led to sustained exploration and colonization of the Caribbean by Europeans. This landfall initiated the Age of Discovery.

For many years, Americans celebrated Columbus Day on October 12 annually. It became a federal holiday in 1937. Since the Uniform Monday Holiday Act became law in 1971, Americans celebrate Columbus Day annually on the second Monday in October. It is one of eleven federal holidays. Federal offices, courts, and the U.S. Postal Service close, while most banks also close. Numerous federal employees take Friday off to make a four-day weekend.

Many states, cities, and school districts observe the day as Indigenous Peoples’ Day as a day to honor Native American history, culture, and contributions.

Should President Be Able to Fire Agency Heads?

The topic of discussion for this Constitution Monday concerns what might be “the Supreme Court’s biggest decision” and possibly its least popular. According to Alan Hurst, a Marquette Law School poll shows “only 49% of Americans approve of Trump v. Slaughter, the court’s ruling that presidents can fire the heads of independent executive agencies.” 

After discussing all thirteen Supreme Court decisions in the Marquette poll, Hurst explained why he thinks “it’s good that the president can fire the heads of executive agencies, regardless of whether I like the president?”

To answer, let’s consider a “who cares if you’re angry” theory of government, in which we place government institutions into one of three general categories – reviewed here in order from the least to the most democratic.

Category 3: An intentionally insulated judiciary

If you’re angry about a federal court’s decision, does anyone in the judiciary care?

Not particularly. They don’t answer to you.

I don’t mean to suggest judges are heartless or immune to outside influence. You’re free to criticize their decisions publicly, engineer lawsuits to move the law in your direction, or file amicus briefs and try to be persuasive.

But if you’re hoping to do more than persuade – if you’re hoping to pressure them to do something they’re not inclined to do – then you’re unlikely to succeed. The whole point of life tenure is not to let you do that, because justice by public opinion is no justice at all.

Category 2: A president who responds to his coalition (but not necessarily anyone else)

If you’re angry about a decision by an executive agency – say, the FDA or the EPA – does anyone at the agency care?

Unlike Supreme Court justices, the heads of the FDA and the EPA can be fired by the president, which means their goals and priorities can’t stray too far from the president’s goals and priorities.

And while the president doesn’t care about you individually, there are people he does care about: key senators, senior advisers, media figures he respects, or allies and interest groups whose support he depends on to pursue his goals and win the next election (either for himself or for his party).

And what that means, practically speaking, is that there are people you can lobby. It’s a ladder-climbing exercise: You find somebody who knows somebody who knows somebody. Maybe you know a state legislator who can introduce you to someone in your state attorney general’s inner circle, who can then put your issue in front of the attorney general’s official contact at the White House.

Or maybe someone can introduce you to a popular blogger or columnist who can publish your story and try to put it on the radar at a big media himself.

But at every rung, the person you’re hoping will help is going to be asking, “Is the guy above me going to think this was worth bringing to his attention? Is it an issue he cares about, or is it coming from a constituency he cares about?”

And if the answer is no – as it usually will be if you’re in the wrong political party – then your attempt to influence the agency democratically will never get off the ground.

Category 1: Intentionally vulnerable representatives

In the final category, if you’re angry about a decision anywhere in government, will your member of Congress care? And here the answer is “very probably.”

Thanks to gerrymandering, social media, hyper partisanship, and so on, Congress isn’t what it used to be – to keep their seats, congresspeople have had to fall in line more often and get more ideological.

But to this day, senators and representatives maintain staff for “constituent services,” i.e., they employ people whose job responsibilities include hearing your complaints and trying to do something about them. And what’s more, when it comes to helping constituents deal with federal agencies and such, ethics rules require them to provide their help without regard to a constituent’s political affiliation.

There’s no guarantee you’ll get the answer you like – nothing stops your legislator from just disagreeing with you. But even if she does, you’ll probably still get a personal response and an explanation of why she’s saying no.

Why the president should be able to fire agency heads

So what does this “who cares if you’re angry” theory have to do with letting presidents fire the heads of independent agencies?

In a nutshell, the decision tries to move independent agencies from Category 3 to Category 2 – from “intentionally insulated against public opinion” to “susceptible to public pressure through the White House.”

It’s an improvement, but it’s not ideal – ideally you want to move most of the power not to Category 2 but to Category 1, where a normal person can raise an issue as directly as possible with someone who wants his vote.

And on this point, I encourage you to read Justice Neil Gorsuch’s Slaughter concurrence, in which he lays out the basic problem: a trend beginning in the early 20^th century to undo the separation of powers and turn the work of government over to supposedly impartial experts….

While Slaughter fixes part of the damage, the larger work still depends on future cases (and future legislation by Congress) that can return powers to Congress that it foolishly turned over to the executive.

            I’ll give the last word to Gorsuch: “From here, the only sure path is to finish the journey we start             today and restore legislative and judicial powers to where they belong: in Congress and the                    courts. We have tolerated adventurous theories long enough. It is time to return, all the way, to                the Constitution.” 

Who Does Christ Want to Return to His Presence?

My Come Follow Me studies for this week took me to Isaiah 50-57 and a lesson titled “He Hath Borne Our Griefs, and Carried Our Sorrows.” The following information introduced the lesson. 

Throughout his ministry, Isaiah spoke of a mighty deliverer. These prophecies would have been especially precious to the Israelites centuries later when they were in captivity in Babylon. Someone who could tear down the walls of Babylon would be a mighty conqueror indeed. But that isn’t the kind of Messiah that Isaiah described in chapters 52-53: “He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him. … We did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted” (Isaiah 53:3-4).

By sending such an unexpected deliverer, God taught us about true deliverance. To save us from oppression and affliction, God sent One who Himself “was oppressed, and … afflicted.” Where some expected a lion, He sent a lamb (see Isaiah 53:7). Surely, God’s ways are not our ways (see Isaiah 55:8-9). Jesus Christ frees us not by just opening the prison but by taking our place there. He relieves us from our chains of grief and sorrow by bearing them Himself (see Isaiah 53:4-5, 12). He does not save us from a distance. He suffers with us, in acts of “everlasting kindness” that “shall not depart from thee” (Isaiah 54:8, 10).

The scripture block teaches the following principles: (1) The future is bright for the Lord’s people (Isaiah 50-52); (2) Jesus Christ took upon Himself my sins and sorrows (Isaiah 53); (3) Jesus Christ wants me to return to Him (Isaiah 54; 57:15-19); (4) The Lord invites all to “take hold of my covenant” (Isaiah 55-56). This essay will discuss principle #4 about Christ desiring each of us to return to Him.

Each of us has times when we feel far from God. Usually, the distance comes because of our sins or weaknesses. I have found that stress and extreme fatigue can affect how quickly the distance grows. Isaiah 54 and 57 are chapters that are full of reassurance and encouragement. Isaiah 54:4-10 is one place that contains encouragement.

4 Behold, I have given him for a witness to the people, a leader and commander to the people.

5 Behold, thou shalt call a nation that thou knowest not, and nations that knew not thee shall run unto thee because of the Lord thy God, and for the Holy One of Israel; for he hath glorified thee.

6 ¶ Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near:

7 Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the Lord, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon.

8 ¶ For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord.

9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

10 For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater:

The above verses tell us how the Savior feels about each one of us. What difference does it make in your life to know these things about Him? President Dieter F. Uchtdorf taught the following.

“It matters not how completely ruined our lives may seem. It matters not how scarlet our sins, how deep our bitterness, how lonely, abandoned, or broken our hearts may be. Even those who are without hope, who live in despair, who have betrayed trust, surrendered their integrity, or turned away from God can be rebuilt. …

“The joyous news of the gospel is this: because of the eternal plan of happiness provided by our loving Heavenly Father and through the infinite sacrifice of Jesus the Christ, we can not only be redeemed from our fallen state and restored to purity, but we can also transcend mortal imagination and become heirs of eternal life and partakers of God’s indescribable glory” (“He Will Place You on His Shoulders and Carry You Home,” Ensign or Liahona, May 2016, 102). 

What Is the Difference Between Strong Families and Struggling Families?

Strong families strengthen communities, states, and nations. Research shows that strong families share certain characteristics. I asked AI for strategies to strengthen families and found the following list. 

·       1. Open and Honest Communication

Strategies: Encourage family members to share thoughts and feelings without fear of judgment. Use active listening, ask open-ended questions like “How was your day?” and express feelings with “I” statements, such as “I feel upset when…” to avoid blame. Regular check-ins, even for 10 minutes a day, help maintain understanding and prevent misunderstandings.

·       2. Spend Quality Time Together

Prioritize meaningful activities that everyone enjoys, such as family meals, game nights, walks, or shared hobbies. Quality time strengthens emotional bonds, fosters cooperation, and creates lasting memories. Even simple moments, like watching a movie together or cooking, can be impactful when distractions are minimized.

·       3. Show Appreciation and Gratitude

Expressing thanks and acknowledging small acts of kindness build positive feelings and reinforces family cohesion. Compliments, thank-you notes, or verbal recognition of efforts help family members feel valued and supported.

·       4. Create Family Rituals and Traditions

Rituals, such as weekly pizza nights, Sunday movie outings, or annual vacations, provide a sense of identity, continuity, and belonging. These shared experiences strengthen connections and offer stability during life changes.

·       5. Support Individual Interests

Respect and encourage each family member’s hobbies and personal goals. This demonstrates recognition of individuality while maintaining family unity, helping children and teens develop confidence and self-esteem.

·       6. Handle Conflicts Constructively

Identify the root causes of disagreements and approach them with empathy. Use strategies like agreeing to disagree, setting boundaries, and compromising when necessary. Transform challenging moments into opportunities for growth and learning.

·       7. Share Responsibilities and Roles

Clearly define household roles and parenting responsibilities to ensure balance and teamwork. Regularly communicate and adjust roles as needed to prevent stress and model cooperation for children.

·       8. Engage in Community or Service Activities Together

Participating in charitable projects or community service as a family fosters empathy, shared purpose, and teamwork, while reinforcing family values.

·       9. Foster Emotional Support and Resilience

Encourage open discussions about challenges, provide reassurance, and model healthy coping strategies. Strong family bonds help children and teens develop resilience, self-esteem, and better decision-making skills.

The strategies above can strengthen families. The following additional practices can further reinforce family bonds.

      ·       Family Prayer

“Families that pray together stay together.” Family prayer at least once per day will unite a family.

·       Eat Meals Together – without phones or television.

Family members should eat at least one meal together every single day. Research shows that this single activity will strengthen family relationships.

·       Study Scriptures Together

Reading and discussing scriptures together each evening before family prayer will strengthen family ties.

·       Attend Church Together

Sharing faith together strengthens relationships.

 

Are Caravans in Mexico Threatening to U.S. Sovereignty?

The liberty principle for this Freedom Friday concerns national sovereignty – the ability of a state to govern itself. This ability includes the authority to decide who enters the nation. This topic is back in the news because a migrant caravan left Honduras with plans to travel to the southern border of the United States.

In his article, Todd Bensman explained that the aspirations of the caravan ended soon after it crossed into Mexico. He continued with the following information. 

Mexico’s Policy of Controlled Dispersal

My assessment about Mexican caravans is based on experience traveling with the old rebel-style migrant caravans that aimed to crash the border back in 2018 and 2019 and the very new and different escorted transit caravans forming now.

I discovered these during a field research trip to Tapachula City just north of the Guatemala border in November 2024. The city of 400,000 is a major waystation and chokepoint on the Latin American migration trail exiting Guatemala.

Border hawk Trump had just been elected president, but open-borders dove President Joe Biden was still in office. Thousands of migrants in Tapachula were forming caravans and heading north, prompting American commentators to sound the alarm that the caravans intended to breach the U.S. border before Trump took office. I joined one of about a thousand north of Tapachula.

I was surprised to learn that the pundits were wrong.

The Mexican government was allowing these caravans to form so that its military and state police could inexpensively transfer them out of Tapachula and into other southern Mexican cities. The government scheme was (and still is) intended to relieve a growing humanitarian crisis in Tapachula, where shortages of work, food, and shelter had become critical. What I saw was a purposeful, government-controlled dispersal operation.

Influenced by Washington Policies

Why would Mexico volunteer to do any of this in the fourth year of Biden’s historic mass migration crisis when its central government under President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador had let millions move on through largely unchecked?

The little-known answer is that, in December 2023 as I fully reported then, Biden’s emissaries initiated a quiet deal to have Mexico reduce the incoming U.S. border crowds because the social media video looked terrible for Democrats running in the 2024 presidential election campaign.

The simpatico progressive liberal Obrador, wanting a Democrat president, deployed 32,000 troops to block all roads leading out of Tapachula and southern states like Chiapas. Next, Mexico began aggressive, sustained roundups of undocumented foreign nationals in Mexican cities and towns along its northern border with the U.S. from Tijuana to Matamoros.

The soldiers and police forced tens of thousands from Mexico’s north onto jets and buses and shipped them to the Tapachula while thousands a day were still arriving from Guatemala.

Trump won the election in large part on Biden’s open border and, once inaugurated, demanded that Mexico’s new President Claudia Sheinbaum, also a progressive liberal, continue the blockades and border sweeps under threat of devastating trade tariffs. 

How It Works

To prevent a humanitarian disaster and relieve Tapachula’s misery, the Sheinbaum government initially handed out “transit slips” and brought in buses to transport migrants to other Chiapas State cities and as far north as Mexico City. But demand outstripped the bus supply, so officials defaulted to the cheaper escorted foot caravans.

Whereas the caravans of old would violently break through security roadblocks, the Mexican military and police would surround this new kind of caravan in the front, back and all along its length and protect the marchers from predatory criminals. The security forces would gently direct them to turn down this or that road fork. Then at destinations, the security forces would deliver the compliant marchers to aid organizations and shelters and block them from further movement north.

While the many walkers I interviewed in late 2024 said sure they’d love to enter the United States someday, all told me they fully understood that Mexico’s government was to simply move them to other southern Mexican towns offering more work and sustenance while they waited for work and residency permits. The police and soldiers all confirmed the intercity transfer caravan policy and that it was a relatively new policy.

What to Look For

The Fey Esperanza caravan was hardly the first, but it attracted significant U.S. media attention because a major U.S. midterm election campaign is underway. In 2025 and so far in 2026, Mexico escorted at least another dozen intercity transit caravans to southern Mexican cities that drew no similar American media attention.

The telltale clue that these and the Fey Esperanza were controlled dispersal caravans not heading to the U.S. border: the Mexican security escorts.

A lot of Americans would not have known which kind of caravan they were seeing from video and naturally presumed it was enroute to the U.S. border.

Indeed, the transit caravan was rapidly disintegrating during Oct. 3-4 weekend as per the routine. The Trump administration was correct to noisily telegraph to Sheinbaum that she cannot let caravans reach the U.S. border and that migrants in them would face a tough confrontation if she let them through.

The article concluded that the caravans would continue because immigrants are still moving from Guatemala to Mexico, and Mexican security forces are still moving immigrants from the north and sending them south. However, Trump’s tariff threats against Mexico force Mexico to work with the United States to keep caravans away from the border.

Bensman says, “All bets are off once Trump leaves office in January 2029, no matter if a Republican or Democrat takes his spot. Look for caravans that might try their luck in the months before or after January 2029. Those will not be benign.”

Articles of Faith: What Do Latter-day Saints Believe About the Atonement of Jesus Christ? 5

                                                                        Article of Faith 3

We believe that through the Atonement of Christ, all mankind may be saved,

by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel.

This is the fifth essay about the Atonement of Jesus Christ as stated in the third Article of Faith of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The first week, I discussed the importance of understanding how the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ, as the third pillar of eternity, is essential to Heavenly Father’s plan for the eternal happiness of His children. The second week, the discussion was about the Atonement of Jesus Christ and the nature of the atonement. Last week, the discussion concerned the Atonement of Jesus Christ as a vicarious sacrifice. Last week, the discussion was about Christ’s sacrifice being voluntary and love inspired. The discussion for this week will be about the Atonement being foreordained and foretold, using the words of Elder James E. Talmage (Articles of Faith [1913], 81-85).

The Atonement Foreordained and Foretold – As already shown, the plan of the Father to open a way for the redemption of mankind, then to leave all men free to exercise their agency, was adopted by the council in heaven to the rejection of Lucifer’s plan of compulsion. Even at that remote period Christ was thus ordained as a mediator for all mankind; in fact, “a covenant was entered into between Him and His Father, in which He agreed to atone for the sins of the world, and He thus, as stated, became the ‘Lamb slain from before the foundation of the world.’” Prophets who lived centuries before the time of Christ’s birth testified of Him and of the great work He had been ordained to perform. These men of God had been permitted to behold in prophetic visions many of the scenes incident to the Savior’s earthly mission, and they solemnly bore record of the manifestations. The testimony of Christ is the spirit of prophecy, and without it no person can rightly claim the distinction of being a prophet of God [emphasis added.] Adam’s despair incident to the fall was changed to joy when, through revelation, he learned of the plan of redemption to be wrought by the Son of God in the flesh. Righteous Enoch taught the same truths, which had been declared to him from the heavens. This testimony was borne by Moses, Job, David, Zechariah, Isaiah, and Micah. The same declaration was made by John the Baptist who was characterized by the Lord as more than a prophet.

Should there be doubt as to the application of such prophecies, we have the conclusive testimony of Christ that they refer to Himself. On that memorable day, immediately following His resurrection, while walking incognito with two disciples on the road to Emmaus. He taught them the scriptures that had been written concerning the Son of God: “Beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.” A few hours after this event the Lord appeared to the eleven at Jerusalem. He operated upon their minds “that they might understand the scriptures; and said unto them: Thus it is written, and thus it behooved Christ to suffer,” in this way testifying that He was fulfilling a previously ordained plan. Peter, one of the Savior’s most intimate earthly associates, refers to Him as “a lamb without blemish and without spot: Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world. In his epistle to the Romans, Paul characterizes Christ as the one “Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past.” These are but a few of the Biblical evidences of Christ’s foreordination; both Old and New Testament writings abound in proofs of the Messiah’s appointed work.

Book of Mormon prophets are characterized by the directness of their testimonies concerning the Messiah. Because of his faith the brother of Jared was permitted to behold the Savior, twenty-two centuries prior to the meridian of time and to be shown that man was created after the image of the Lord, at the same time being taught of the Father’s purpose that the Son take upon Himself flesh and dwell upon the earth. Note the personal declaration of the foreordained Redeemer to this prophet: “Behold, I am he who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people. Behold, I am Jesus Christ. I am the Father and the Son. In me shall all mankind have light, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters.”

Nephi records the prophecy of his father Lehi concerning the future appearing of the Son in the flesh, His baptism, death, and resurrection; and this prophetic utterance specifies the exact date of the Savior’s birth – six hundred years after the time of Lehi’s exodus from Jerusalem. The mission of John the Baptist is described and even the place of baptism is designated. Shortly after the time of Lehi’s vision, Nephi was shown by the Spirit the same things, as also many others, some of which he has written but the greater part of which he was forbidden to write, as another, the Apostle John, had been ordained to set them forth in a book which should form part of the Bible. But, from the partial account of his vision we learn that he saw, in Nazareth, Mary the Virgin, first alone and shortly afterward with a child in her arms; and that the demonstrator of the vision informed him that the infant was the Lamb of God, the Son of the Eternal Father. Then Nephi beheld the Son ministering among the children of men, proclaiming the word, healing the sick, and working many other wondrous miracles; he saw John, the prophet of the wilderness, going before Him; he beheld the Savior baptized of John, and the Holy Ghost descending upon Him with the visible sign of the dove. Then he saw and prophesied that twelve apostles would follow the Savior in His ministry; that the Son would be taken and judged of men and finally be slain. Piercing the future even beyond the time of the crucifixion. Nephi beheld the strife of the world against the apostles of the Lamb and the final triumph of God’s cause.

Jacob, brother of Nephi, prophesied to his brethren that Christ would appear in the flesh among the Jews, and that He would be scourged and crucified. King Benjamin lifted his voice in support of the same testimony, and preached unto his people the righteous condescension of God. So also declared Abinadi, Alma, Amulek, and /Samuel the Lamanite prophet. The literal fulfilment of these prophecies furnishes proof of their truth. The signs and wonders indicative of Christ’s birth and death were all realized; and after His death and ascension the Savior manifested Himself among the Nephites while the Father proclaimed Him to the multitude.

The ancient scriptures, then, are plain in declaring that Christ came upon the earth to do a work previously allotted. He lived, suffered and died, in accordance with a plan that had been framed in righteousness even before the world was, for the redemption of the children of Adam. Equally important and explicit is the word of latter-day revelation through which the Son has declared Himself as Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, man’s Advocate with the Father, the universal Redeemer. Consider a single citation from the many revelations concerning Christ given in the present dispensation: “Listen to the voice of the Lord your God, even Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, whose course is one eternal round, the same today as yesterday, and forever. I am Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who was crucified for the sins of the world, even as many as will believe on my name, that they may become the sons of God, even one in me as I am one in the Father, as the Father is one in me, that we may be one.”