Did Joe Biden Push Prosecutions of Donald Trump?

Family, communities, states, and nations are stronger when parents teach integrity to their children. An example of the lack of integrity is the circumstances of the 2024 presidential election. The following information shows the lack of integrity of Joe Biden and other Democrats.

At a hearing in Congress this week, congressional members grilled Attorney General Merrick Garland about communications between the Department of Justice and the district attorneys prosecuting Donald Trump. He refused to answer their questions. However, members of Congress are not the only people asking questions the prosecutions. Victor Davis Hanson authored an article in The Daily Signal questioning the role of Biden and other Democrats in the prosecutions. 

The five criminal and civil prosecutions of former President Donald Trump all prompt heated denials from Democrats that President Joe Biden and Democrat operatives had a role in any of them.

But Biden has long let it be known that he was frustrated with his own Department of Justice’s federal prosecutors for their tardiness in indicting Trump.

Biden was upset because any delay might mean that his rival Trump would not be in federal court during the 2024 election cycle. And that would mean he could not be tagged as a “convicted felon” by the November election while being kept off the campaign trail.

Hanson then noted that Biden-friendly Politico “reported earlier this February that a frustrated Biden ‘has grumbled to aides and advisers that had [Attorney General Merrick] Garland moved sooner in his investigation into former President Donald Trump’s election interference, a trial may already be underway or even have concluded…’”

According to Hanson, Politico even went so far as to blame Trump for Biden’s anger against Garland: “That trial still could take place before the election and much of the delay is owed not to Garland but to deliberate resistance put up by the former president and his team.” Hanson continued with his explanation.

Note in passing how a presidential candidate’s legal right to oppose a politicized indictment months before an election by his opponent’s federal attorneys is smeared by Politico as “deliberate resistance.”

Given Politico was publicly reporting six months ago about Biden’s anger at the pace of his DOJ’s prosecution of Trump, does anyone believe his special counsel, Jack Smith, was not aware of such presidential displeasure and pressure?

Note Smith had petitioned and was denied an unusual request to the court to speed up the course of his Trump indictment.

And why would Biden’s own attorney general, Garland, select such an obvious partisan as Smith? Remember, in his last tenure as special counsel, Smith had previously gone after popular Republican and conservative Virginia governor Bob McDonnell.

Yet Smith’s politicized persecution of the innocent McDonnell was reversed by a unanimous verdict of the U.S. Supreme Court. That rare court unanimity normally should have raised a red flag to the Biden DOJ about both Smith’s partiality and his incompetence….

The White House’s involvement is not limited to the Smith federal indictments.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ paramour and erstwhile lead prosecutor lead prosecutor in her indictment of Trump, Nathan Wade, met twice with the White House counsel’s office. On one occasion, Wade met inside the Biden White House.

Subpoenaed records reveal that the brazen Wade actually billed the federal government for his time spent with the White House counsel’s staff – although so far no one has disclosed under oath the nature of such meetings.

Hanson asked an important question: how many local prosecutors consult with the White House counsel’s office? Hanson gave the figure of “tens of thousands” for such possible local prosecutions.

Hanson also commented on the felony convictions of Trump in Alvin Bragg, Manhattan District Attorney. Why was the prosecution “spearheaded by former prominent federal prosecutor Matthew Colangelo” who left the Department of Justice to work in a district attorney’s office?

Again, among all the multitudes of annual municipal indictments nationwide, how many local prosecutors manage to enlist one of the nation’s three top federal attorneys to head their case?

So, apparently, it was not enough for the shameless Bragg to campaign flagrantly on promises to go after Trump. In addition, Bragg brashly drafted a top Democratic operative and political appointee from inside Biden’s DOJ to head his prosecution.

Only hours after Trump’s conviction in Manhattan, Biden was blasting his rival as a “convicted felon.” Biden is delighted at the prospect that Trump will be kept permanently off the campaign trail. Hanson concluded his article with the following statement.

So, it is past time for the media and Democrats to drop this ridiculous ruse of Biden’s White House “neutrality.” Instead, they should admit that they are terrified of the will of the people in November and so are conniving to silence them.