The liberty principle for this Freedom Friday concerns judges and the freedom-based need for them to be neutral in their judgments. Since 2015 when Donald Trump came down his golden escalator and announced that he was going to run for President of the United States, Deep State players have tried several ways to take him out of the presidential race and then out of the Oval Office. He was harassed during his first term in office and in the 2020 presidential election. He had a reprieve after leaving office in January 2021 until November 2022 when he announced his intention to run again for office in the 2024 presidential election.
Trump and JD Vance won all seven swing states in the 2024 presidential election and 312 electoral votes – what is being called “an overwhelming victory.” According to Victor David Hanson, this was “not just a plurality” but “a referendum on America.”
After
all, they were the first ticket on the Republican side to have won the popular
vote in 20 years. They won an overwhelming majority in the Electoral College.
They retain control of the House of Representatives. They won the Senate. There’s
a 6-3, supposedly, conservative majority on the Supreme Court. They won all of
the swing states.
So,
they came into office with this momentum from the American people that was
expressed through a national election. And yet, they are now stymied.
Almost
all of their initiatives are facing two types of opposition. The first is, in a
preplanned way, liberal organizations, lavishly funded by what they themselves
might want to call oligarchs, have funded massive lawsuits against the Trump
administration, stopping executive orders.
Remember,
this idea that executive orders were a rapid and effective way for a president
to rule … came from former President Barack Obama….
Judge
Anna Reyes in Washington … just ruled to stop the Pentagon’s new policy, not
having or forbidding transgendered people in combat units.
Judge
Jesse Furman, another lower district judge, … just put out a stay not too long
ago rescinding the deportation of Mahmoud Khalil.
And
Judge James Boasberg stopped the deportation of this very dangerous Tren de
Aragua gang of South American criminals who came here illegally….
We
don’t know how these people from South America and these gangs got here. But we
do know they came illegally. And they are residing illegally. And they’re in
very dangerous gangs and many of them have committed crimes. So, if it was – if
they broke the law to come here, we want to enforce the law to have them go
back….
And
so, what we’re seeing is liberal groups trying to keep people who are
supporting the terrorist Hamas or supporting these gangs inside the United
States.
This
is very analogous – cherry-picking left-wing judges is very analogous to what
we watched all during the 2022-24 lawfare period.
You
remember Judge Arthur Engoron, Judge Juan Merchan, and Judge Lewis Kaplan – he was
the judge in the E. Jean Carroll case. And we had the Alvin Bragg judge and the
Letitia James [judge]. They were all – like these judges, they had two things
in common: They were left-wing activist judges, appointed by either former
President Joe Biden, Obama, or former President Bill Clinton. And they had
minor to major conflicts of interest where people in their family were big,
either had worked for a prior Democratic administration or themselves were
activists.
And
what did they do? They tried to put Donald Trump in jail.
That
same lawfare has now been transmogrified and put into a more concerted effort
to stop everything that Donald Trump is trying to do. And what he’s trying to
do, remember, is not radical. It’s just simply to enforce immigration law. It’s
just simply to bring back the country to the middle.
Most
knowledgeable people understand that all the cases will be overturned by appellate
courts or the Supreme Court. Even those involved in the lawfare know that they
have losing causes, but they just want to slow down Trump’s progress. Hanson’s
words are, “they want to delay, delay, delay.”
No comments:
Post a Comment