Families are stronger when young couples marry early and thrive together. To clarify, “early” means age 20 to 25, not as teenagers. Kasen Stephensen, an engineer, shared his experience and why he considers “early” marriage to be ideal rather than waiting to become financially or professionally established first.
In
sociological research, this perspective [waiting to become established first]
is known as the “capstone” conception of marriage. Adherents see marriage as a
culminating achievement sought after some time exploring sexually,
establishing a financial base, and maturing. As the median age at which
Americans get married for the first tie has crept steadily upwards for the last
40 years – to almost 29 for women and just over 30 for men – this perspective
has become the de facto norm.
While
this seems like a reasonable approach, it comes with two major risks. First, it
assumes that one can successfully get “established” before getting married.
With soaring home prices, record student debt, persistent inflation and a
competitive job market, obtaining the independence or financial stability
thought “necessary” may be perpetually out of reach for many individuals,
particularly among the working class. Secondly, waiting until an indefinite
later can force one’s hand when biological and social deadlines converge in the
early 30s….
[Comparing
dating in 20s to playing musical chairs:] This scramble for seats can be
mitigated by deliberately planning backwards and examining an alternative model
of marriage called “cornerstone” marriage. In this model, marriage is less an
achievement and more a foundation for life. Instead of merging two settled
individuals, it emphasizes the intertwining of two budding people – generally between
the ages of 20 and 25 – who can traverse their formative years together.
I
believe that many young Americans who wish to one day marry do not fully
examine the merits of the “cornerstone” framework because they suspect marrying
earlier is linked to worse outcomes. This suspicion is correct, but only for
teen marriages (18 and 19-year-olds), who have higher risks of dissatisfaction
and divorce. Research from the National Marriage Project at UVA demonstrates
that there is no significant difference in reported marital satisfaction or
divorce rates between earlier marriages (between the ages of 20 and 24) and
later marriages (after 25). In fact, there appear to be optimal outcomes in
sex, finances and psychology for those who marry earlier.
For
example, one study found that men and women who married earlier reported
significantly higher rates of sexual satisfaction than those who married at any
other age. This finding directly conflicts with contemporary perspectives on
sex: men are told by the “manosphere” that marriage is a trap and that they
should maximize the number of sexual partners while minimizing emotional
attachment. Women are encouraged to reap the rewards of decades of feminist
progress and experience all they can, including meaningless sex.
It’s
possible that those who marry earlier are more sexually satisfied precisely
because they opt out of this contemporary hookup culture. Several studies have
shown that having more premarital sex partners is linked to “worse
communication, higher infidelity rates, and even lower sexual quality during
marriage.” For those who value marriage, it seems reasonable that maximizing
the number of sexual partners is probably harmful.
Additionally,
research has documented that sexual satisfaction can be significantly higher
within committed relationships, especially for women. Overall, this suggests
that the premarital sexual exploration commonplace today may actually undermine
the sexual satisfaction many are seeking; satisfaction that an early marriage
can provide.
There
are also financial benefits to getting married in your 20s. One causal study
found that merging bank accounts increases marital satisfaction: couples fight
less about money and feel better about how finances are handled. For those who
marry earlier, their finances will be modest at best, and the merging of bank
accounts can be more straight-forward than the fortunes of mid-30s
professionals. They can also co-create financial habits and expectations
together, rather than having to merge established lifestyle and spending
habits. Marriage is as much the merger of wallets as it is of hearts.
An
early marriage offers an income boost as well. Married people of both genders
tend to earn more than single people in similar age brackets, an observation
called the “marriage premium.” Recent research hypothesizes it is driven by
having a partner when looking for work….
Outside
of work, life itself presents challenges which may be better weathered with a
committed partner. Life is better with someone by your side who can share the
expenses and chores, difficulties and challenges, and celebrations and wins….
By marrying early, you gain a partner you can grow with, someone you can
support who also supports you. The “affectionate wing” of a loving spouse can
create the stability that allows both individuals to flourish.
…
I would today comment that considering marriage in your 20s isn’t about
limiting options or settling down prematurely. It’s about intentionally
incorporating a committed partner into your vision of a fulfilling life. By
seeking marriage earlier rather than postponing it indefinitely, you’re not
just avoiding the frantic musical chairs of your 30s – you’re creating the
opportunity to dance through life’s challenges and triumphs with someone who
loves you, supports you and helps you grow.
Young
adults should seek to marry in their early twenties – between 20 and 24 – and grow
together sexually, emotionally, spiritually, and financially. Such young people
can and do establish strong marriages that strengthen their family, community,
state, and nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment