The liberty principle for this Freedom Friday concerns immigration. Illegal immigration should be non-existent, and legal immigration should lead to the betterment of America. According to Victor Davis Hanson, discussion about immigration should include the attitude of the immigrant towards America and their expression of appreciation or gratitude for the opportunity to come. Attitude and gratitude for the opportunity to immigrate can be shown in obedience to the laws of the land or actually expression of love for America.
In his
article published at The Daily Signal, Hanson explains how the above can be
shown in a variety of context. In California, more than 17,000 illegal
immigrants received licenses to drive, which led to “a lot of drunk driving
incidents and violence” and murders by people who crossed the border illegally.
Other areas had college students from the Middle East showing “support for Hamas,
Hezbollah, antisemitic sloganeering.” In Minnesota, “the Somali community got a
billion dollars or multibillion-dollar grants … supposedly to supply food and
meals….”
There
were a variety of state and local laws that were violated, but there were no
prosecutions….
But
this opened a larger question. If you were an immigrant and you came to the
United States from a war-torn, impoverished, and dangerous place, like Somalia,
shouldn’t you express gratitude?
Ilhan
Omar came here, to take one example…. She came here at 13 and she was given
every benefit of being a U.S. resident and then a U.S. citizen. She was given a
generous scholarship to go to college. She was elected to the Minnesota House
of Representatives. She was elected to Congress. I think she’s a four-term
congresswoman.
She
insisted, even though she was an American citizen, to wear the traditional
Somali hijab, even though there was a rule in the House, an old rule, that
people don’t wear headwear or gear or hats inside the Capitol chambers when
Congress is in session. They made a special exception just for her.
But
I mention this because she has a long line of indiscretions, and they form a
pattern.
She
said that the United States was a trashy country. She said that the
dictatorship in America, i.e., the Trump administration, was not much different
from the one that she left in Somalia. She said that Charlie Kirk, right after
his death, was a scholastic terrorist….
She
also said that it’s the Benjamins, baby, when she was making the argument that,
as she put it, we in the Congress don’t have to have an allegiance to a foreign
country and implying that Jewish members put Israel ahead of the United States.
And
so, she’s been part of “the squad” and she’s had to apologize for some of her
antisemitic rhetoric. She’s expressed overt criticism of the country that
befriended her and allowed her to be educated at mostly at public cost, to be a
representative of Congress, to write a book with a major New York publisher.
She’s
also, she put on one of her financial disclosures that she almost had a zero
net worth. Now, after her marriage to Tim Mynett … she now says that … their
net worth may be as great as $30 million.
There’s
also an accusation that, allegedly, allegedly, that she may have
formalistically married her brother to ease his citizenship application, and
then that marriage was legal and then it was dissolved as she married again….
My
point is that, in this greater discussion about the fraud that goes on in
Minnesota and our worry about immigrants on campus, behind the wheel of a
semi-truck, administering a fraudulent food program, coming across the southern
border, and then committing acts of violence, maybe, just maybe, we should ask
of our immigrants a little gratitude….
And
in this whole nexus, Ilhan Omar stands out as a person for two reasons. As an
immigrant example, this country has lavished no more benefits on anyone than
her….
And
now she’s mysteriously a multimillionaire. And we still don’t know how the
entire story of how citizenship was attained, from her brother….
And
so, Ilhan Omar is an example of what’s wrong with legal and illegal
immigration, that we allow people from countries that are … “Third World,” but
are in chaos, in tumult, they come as refugees, they’re extended every benefit,
and very soon they realize that their advance or their success politically
hinges on the degree to which they express themselves as victims or as hard
leftist or as ingrates. And she’s done all of that.
No comments:
Post a Comment