Declaration of Independence

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. - That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
Showing posts with label Jan 6. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jan 6. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 18, 2024

Where Is the Real Justice for January 6, 2021?

Nearly four years ago, a political gathering turned into an out-of-control mob of people who followed the urging of activists to “go into the Capitol.” Political bias on  the January 6 Select Committee kept the truth from getting to American citizens.

Now, we are learning that the Pentagon got involved in politics, something that the military usually tries to avoid. In an article written by Joseph M. Hanneman and Steve Baker and published at The Blaze, we learn the following: 

The Pentagon dismissed an order from President Donald J. Trump to use the National Guard to ensure safety on Jan. 6, intentionally delayed Guard deployment for hours, lied about it to congressional leaders, and used its own inspector general to cover it all up, a U.S. House report concludes.

The Committee on House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight investigated the matter for two years. Their recent report “put the blame for failure to get National Guard troops to the U.S. Capitol on former Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, two Pentagon Army generals, and Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller.”

“Over the past 24 months of this investigation, my subcommittee staff have faced incredible obstacles in pursuit of the truth; missing and deleted documents, hidden evidence, unaccounted-for video footage, and uncooperative bureaucrats,” said U.S. Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), chairman of the subcommittee….


“This report reveals that there was not just one single cause for what happened at the U.S. Capitol on January 6; but it was a series of intelligence, security, and leadership failures at several levels and numerous entities,” Loudermilk wrote in the report, set for release on Dec. 17.


“Even amid multiple failures, there were two common elements that significantly contributed to the security issues: an excessive amount of political influence on critical decisions, and a greater concern over the optics than for protecting life and property,” Loudermilk wrote.


The Pentagon failures were covered up and made worse by the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, which issued a report “that contains fabricated information, ignores crucial information, fails to interview key individuals, and appears to have collaborated with DoD to portray a false narrative,” the report said.


The Loudermilk report was ostensibly meant to investigate the failures and politicization of the now-defunct Jan. 6 Select Committee, but it spent most of its pages on efforts to stymie getting the National Guard to the Capitol after desperate calls for help from Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund.


Officials in the highest levels of the Pentagon blamed the massive security failure at the Capitol on the District of Columbia National Guard rather than owning up to their own efforts to sabotage making the Guard available to quell rioting, the report said.


“The events of January 6, 2021, were preventable,” Loudermilk wrote.


“For nearly four years, Democrats pushed the narrative that President Trump was solely responsible for the riot at the Capitol – spending millions of taxpayer dollars on a politically motivated witch hunt while failing to legitimately examine how United States Capitol leadership was unable to ensure adequate protection for Members of Congress and thousands of congressional staff.


‘These actions taken by Pentagon leadership led to the DoD’s paralysis in response to the riot at the U.S. Capitol.’


“Incredibly, it would take nearly four years for video footage to emerge of Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi – in a rare moment of true leadership – admitting that she was fully responsible for the security failures that day,” Loudermilk said.


The report suggests that the two top members of the select committee – U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) – should be investigated for allegedly destroying investigative documents and possibly suborning perjury from Cassidy Hutchinson, a key anti-Trump witness who testified before the select committee. Cheney likely broke “numerous federal laws” and “should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” the report said.


The report makes six key findings on the National Guard issue that primarily implicate McCarthy for undermining efforts to move a Guard quick-reaction force from a nearby staging area to the Capitol, forcing Sund to call in 1,700 law enforcement officers from around the National Capital Region to retake the Capitol grounds.

The first key finding concerns Secretary McCarthy. The Loudermilk report and the article at The Blaze put the blame for having no National Guard troops squarely on McCarthy. “Secretary McCarthy ‘intentionally delayed’ the Guard response that had been approved at 3:04 p.m. by acting Secretary Miller.” The Secretary “then lied to Pelosi, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and other congressional leaders” when “he told them that the National Guard troops were ‘physically moving to the Capitol’ when he ‘knew these forces had yet to receive any orders,’ the report said.”

The second key finding concerns both McCarthy and Miller who “both placed unusual restrictions on the D.C. National Guard in memos issued on Jan. 4 and 5, the report said.” The two men did not want the National Guard to be armed: “The memos withheld authority for the DCNG to be ‘issued weapons, ammunition, bayonets, and batons’ and ‘interact physically with protesters.’” McCarthy went further with his restrictions. He required a “concept of operations plan” to be submitted before he would give authority to the “use of a 40-man Quick Reaction Force.”

The report claimed, “These actions taken by Pentagon leadership led to the DoD’s paralysis in response to the riot at the U.S. Capitol.”

The report continued, “The Subcommittee concludes that these explicit control measures on the National Guard stem from both ill-advised, poor judgement by the Acting Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army, and DoD leadership’s intent to prevent or limit the National Guard’s ability to act on January 6.”

The third key finding involves Chief Sund and Secretary McCarthy. Sund sent an “urgent request” for help from the National Guard in “a conference call with the Pentagon at 2:30 p.m.” to request immediate support from the DCNG. However, McCarthy “declined to make himself available for the call,” even though his “permission was expressly required.” Those participating in the conference call were shocked to hear two senior staff generals deny the request for support because of “optics.”

The fourth key finding involves Miller and Sund. Miller approved “Sund’s request for assistance at 3:04 p.m. and communicated the approval to McCarthy, the report said.” However, “McCarthy failed to tell Maj. Gen. William J. Walker, commanding general of the D.C. National Guard, who didn’t receive the approval to act until after 5:00 p.m.”

Even though McCarthy claims to have called Walker at 3:05 p.m., “Walker ‘has consistently denied that he received any communication from Secretary McCarthy or his staff at any point on January 6, 2021, as he was waiting for authorization to deploy his forces to the Capitol,’ the report said.” The report continued, “This failure to communicate the order in a timely manner has never been addressed by either DoD or oversight bodies, including the Select Committee.”

The fifth key finding involves a call at 3:18 p.m. between McCarthy, Pelosi, Schumer, and other key lawmakers who were trying to “impress upon him the urgency of the situation at the Capitol.” McCarthy told them that he was waiting to get permission from his boss, that he had permission, and that the National Guard was moving. “The truth was that the D.C. Guard was not moving and had not been ordered to the Capitol despite Secretary Miller’s 3:04 p.m. approval.”

“The most troubling aspect of these misleading statements is that congressional leaders made decisions affecting the security of Members of Congress and their staff, based on the information that the DCNG was en route to the Capitol at 3:18 p.m.,” the report said….

“To date, no investigation or disciplinary action has taken place against Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy for deceiving congressional leadership with false statements regarding the delay in deployment of the D.C. National Guard to the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021,” the report said.

The article then went to the obstruction of the inspector general. In his report of the riot, the “Department of Defense Office of Inspector General issued a 2021 report that ‘knowingly and inaccurately placed blame on D.C. National Guard leadership,’ the report said.” Then the OIG obstructed the House subcommittee’s work of investigation.

The OIG at times obstructed the work of the subcommittee, which detected an “inappropriately close relationship between the DoD Inspector General and DoD, which compromises the Inspector General’s ability to conduct objective oversight.

The OIG interviewed 43 witnesses in the creation of its Jan. 6 report but “failed to interview key personnel from the DCNG who were heavily involved” in Jan. 6 planning, the report said. The OIG report made “alarming accusations” that Gen. Walker lied in his testimony during a March 2021 Senate hearing.

“Major General Walker’s testimony revealed information that is not favorable to Army staff and senior Pentagon officials, and thus DoD IG constructed their report to deliberately undermine the DCNG Commander’s sworn testimony,” the report said.

Loudermilk and his subcommittee were assisted by four National Guard whistleblowers who testified at a hearing in April 2024. The whistleblowers “called out the Department of Defense OIG Jan. 6 report as being riddled with falsehoods.”

“As an oversight entity, the Subcommittee is simply highlighting the lack of independent and rigorous analysis by the Dod IG in their failure to interview the D.C. National Guard witnesses who have maintained a different account of DoD events on January 6, 2021,” the report said.

President Joe Biden has not fired any individual despite the many failings of his administration. No one was fired for the disastrous retreat from Afghanistan. No one was fired for the United States’ part in the disastrous war in Ukraine. I do not hold much hope for Secretary McCarthy even receiving a reprimand from Biden for his lies and unworthy behavior. However, I expect some thorough housecleaning to be done by Donald Trump, starting on January 20, 2025. I would not be the least bit surprised to learn that Trump requested resignation letters from many of the people in government and military to be on his desk when he gets to the White House after his inauguration.

 

Thursday, January 6, 2022

How Long Will Democrats Use Jan. 6 for Political Gain?

            Today is January 6, the first anniversary of the newest holy day for the Democrats. As expected, Democrats took to the microphones to express their great sadness at the “attack on democracy” one year ago.

            President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris commemorated the anniversary of the assault on the Capitol by making public comments in the Statuary Hall at the U.S. Capitol. As expected, Biden blamed Trump. He referred to Trump as a “self-seeking autocrat” and called him a “defeated” former president who “can’t accept he lost.” Speaking previous to Biden’s remarks, Harris compared January 6 to Pearl Harbor and the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

            Fred Lucas said that Biden and Harris “made some big statements.” Then he analyzed the accuracy of four of their claims. 

1) ‘Most Significant Test’ Since Civil War

Biden said the riot represented a threat to democracy. “We’re facing the most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War…. The Confederates … never breached the Capitol as insurrectionists did on Jan. 6….


Some rioters carried Confederate battle flags into the Capitol on Jan. 6, but at no time did the flag fly in the U.S. Capitol during the Civil War, which raged from 1861 to 1865. So, Biden was correct to say Confederate soldiers did not breach the Capitol carrying the Confederate battle flag.


As for being a comparable threat, that’s more questionable. The Civil War came about after Southern slaveholding states attempted to break away from the United States and form a separate country.


The fledgling Confederate States of America raised its own military in an armed rebellion that wore on for four years and took the lives of more than 600,000 troops.


[The comparison is not a good one.]


2) Dec 7, Sept. 11, and Jan. 6

Harris put Jan. 6 in league with days that will live in infamy.

“Certain dates echo throughout history, including dates that instantly remind all who have lived through them where they were and what they were doing when our democracy came under assault…. Dates that occupy not only a place on our calendars, but a place in our collective memory: Dec. 7, 1941; Sept. 11, 2001; and Jan. 6, 2021."


The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941 killed 2,403 Americans. The 9/11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and in rural Pennsylvania killed 2,997 Americans.


Reportedly, only two people died directly from the violence on Jan. 6, 2021. But as many as seven others died indirectly from the events of the day….


[The comparison is not a good one.]


3) ‘Defeated Former President’

Throughout his speech, Biden did not refer to Trump by name, but continuously blamed the riot on “a former president.”


“He’s not just a former president. He’s a defeated former president, defeated by a margin of over 7 million of your votes in a full and free and fair election.” …


Trump continues to contend the election was neither free nor fair.


Other critics who did not question the outcome nonetheless did raise concerns about large-scale mail-in-voting, as well as private money from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg funding election administration, primarily in heavily Democratic-leaning areas, with the potential to affect the outcome….


[The battle continues to determine if the election was free and fair. Georgia announced today that it would start an investigation into ballot harvesting.]


4) ‘Armed Insurrection’

In a bid to ensure the events of a year ago weren’t shrugged off, Biden insisted, “This wasn’t a group of tourists. This was an armed insurrection.”


Trump has said there were “no guns whatsoever.”


Whether the rioters were armed has been disputed, and that’s perhaps based on a definition of “armed.” Several were carrying pepper spray or bear spray, and wielding flagpoles as clubs in attacking law enforcement officers.


Meanwhile, at least three rioters were charged with having firearms “on Capitol grounds” or stashed nearby, meaning not necessarily inside the Capitol….


Arms aside, so far, federal prosecutors have not charged any of the rioters with insurrection. [Emphasis added.]


The term “insurrection” has a legal definition and a dictionary definition that don’t correlate with what occurred on Jan. 6, Jeffrey Scott Shapiro, a former assistant attorney general, wrote this week in The Wall Street Journal.


He noted that most of those who were arrested have been charged with violating 18 U.S.C. 371, which make it a crime “to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States.” That includes civil disorder, disorderly conduct, entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds, destruction of government property, and obstruction of an official proceeding.


“[N]ot one defendant is charged with insurrection under 18 U.S.C. 2383,” Shapiro wrote. “That’s because insurrection is a legal term with specific elements. No prosecutor would dare mislabel negligent homicide or manslaughter a murder, because they are totally distinct crimes. The media [have] no legal or moral basis to do otherwise.”


He continued: “The events of Jan. 6 also fail to meet the dictionary definition of ‘insurrection,’ which Merriam-Webster defines as “an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government.” A usage note adds that the term implies “an armed uprising that quickly fails or succeeds.”


[Biden was wrong to call the assault “an armed insurrection” and used the term for political benefits.]

            Biden, Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Liz Cheney, and others so-called leaders do not care about democracy or disrespect to the People’s House. They are only interested in doing harm to Donald Trump. What is causing all the hate for a man that once was invited to all their events and often donated to their causes? What are they hiding that they fear he will expose?