Declaration of Independence

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. - That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
Showing posts with label Lindsay Clancy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lindsay Clancy. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Do All Women Support Lindsay Clancy in Killing Her Children?

Bethany Miller has an interesting view about the Lindsay Clancy case, and she claims that women’s reactions to it are like those of the Luigi Mangione case. She told Glenn Beck that the “reactions aren’t a sudden collapse” but “the fruit of a long insidious project.”

The Blaze TV Staff reported on a recent episode of “The Glenn Beck Program” where Miller joined Beck to discuss one question: “What is the state of American women today?” They discussed how “thousands of women continue their support of Lindsay Clancy” and how women failed to stop romanticizing Luigi Mangione even after his pleaded guilty. Why are women responding as they do? Why do women continue their “disturbing advocacy surrounding people who have admitted to killing innocents?” You can listen to the discussion here

In her recent article titled “Lindsay Clancy, Luigi Mangione, and the State of American Women,” Miller explained her theory about what is happening among American women.

In 431 B.C., the Greek playwright Euripides staged Medea, a tragedy about a woman betrayed by her husband who ultimately murders their children in revenge. The chorus of Corinthian women initially sympathizes with Medea’s suffering and Jason’s betrayal, but recoils when her grievance turns toward innocent children. Their empathy had a boundary. They could understand her pain without excusing what she did.

Twenty-four centuries later, that boundary appears considerably less visible. Lindsay Clancy admitted to strangling her three children, 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan. Her defense contends that postpartum psychosis rendered her legally incapable of criminal responsibility, while prosecutors argue that she understood what she was doing and acted deliberately.

Outside the courthouse, however, another trial of sorts has unfolded. Hundreds of supporters, overwhelmingly women, have appeared in pink carrying messages that Clancy “needed help.” Women online have filtered her story through their own experiences with postpartum depression, psychiatric medication, sleeplessness, exhaustion, and physicians who failed to listen. Women have utilized Lindsay Clancy as a mirror for their own experiences of motherhood and mental illness. The refrain is intensely autobiographical: I see her. I understand her. That could have been me. Lindsay Clancy has become more than a defendant. She has become a Rorschach test for modern womanhood.

The trouble with mirrors is that they show us ourselves. They do not necessarily show us the truth about someone else. A state medical examiner testified that complete oxygen deprivation can cause unconsciousness within roughly 10 to 30 seconds, while prosecutors argued that Clancy continued strangling the children after they went limp. Whatever the jury determines about her mental state, these were not abstractions called “a postpartum tragedy.” They were three small children whose mother placed exercise bands around their necks. Cora. Dawson. Callan. If our modern empathy is really as expansive as we congratulate ourselves for believing, surely it should extend first to the children who could not defend themselves.

There is much more to Miller’s article, and you can read it all on this site. 

The bottom line is: It is not acceptable for a mother to kill her own children, whether she is mentally ill or not.