There is some question in my mind about whether the
Obama Administration stands with Israel
- the only democratic government in the Middle East and good friend to the United States . Barack Obama has not visited Israel at all since he became the President of
the United States ,
but he did find time to make a tour of apologies to several Arab
countries. He has also sided with the
Palestinians and against Israel
on several different occasions. During
the 2012 Democratic National Convention there was a big problem about whether
or not that party should recognize Jerusalem as
the capital of Israel .
The
problems between the United States
and Israel
have broken out into the open lately.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, requested a meeting
with Obama while he was in the US
for the UN General Assembly, but the White House refused. Obama's excuse was that the two men would not
be in New York City on the same day, but Israeli
sources say that Netanyahu offered to meet with Obama in Washington .
Netanyahu
apparently wanted to discuss recent US
statements about Iran
with Obama privately, but he openly criticized them after the private meeting
was refused. Netanyahu criticized Washington 's refusal to draw a line in the sand - a
"red line" - a point that would trigger US
military action if Iran
crossed the line.
Netanyahu warned the world about Iran moving
ever closer to having a nuclear bomb. Netanyahu
said at a press conference, "The world tells Israel : `Wait.
There's still time.' And I
say: `Wait for what? Wait until when?' Those in the international community who
refuse to put red lines before Iran
don't have a moral right to place a red light before Israel ."
There may be a political reason for the
increasingly open feud. Mitt Romney, the
Republican presidential candidate, and Mr. Netanyahu are old friends, and
Romney visited Israel
a few weeks ago. With their support for Israel and their position with Iran , Republicans are hoping to draw Jewish
voters to vote for Romney, particularly in key states like Florida
and Ohio .
Romney has consistently criticized Obama for his
soft touch with Iran and
suggested there should be a hard line on Tehran 's
nuclear intentions. Secretary of State
Hilary Clinton stated that the US
would not set deadlines for negotiations with the Iranian government. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta indicated
that he felt no need to set "red lines" because the US would have at least a year to make a decision
after Tehran
decided to make a nuclear weapon.
"We know generally what they're up to, and so we keep a close track
on them. We think we will have the
opportunity once we know that they've made that decision [to] take the action necessary to stop [Iran]."
The apparent problem causing disagreement between
the US and Israel is on their perception of
the threat. Israel
is watching Iran 's capability to make a nuclear weapon
while the US
is focused on whether or not there will be an actual weapon. The Obama
Administration does not want to use the military route against Iran and prefers to give the UN sanctions more
time to force Tehran
to give up its nuclear intentions.
So the question remains: Does the US
stand with Israel
while Obama is President? I do not think
so. I can easily understand why Israel is concerned about Iran having nuclear abilities because Iran has consistently stated that Israel should
be destroyed. I believe the US should at least show Iran and the world that Israel is our
friend and we will be on the Israeli side of any war. I believe that a Romney Administration would
be acting much more positively with Israel . I firmly believe that the US must stand with Israel ! Israel
is God's covenant people, and any nation that fights against Israel will
lose. Israel has won every war forced
upon it in the past sixty years. Israel wins
because God is with them; even the most powerful military in the world cannot
win a war against God!
No comments:
Post a Comment