Problems with the
Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, continues to surface. The law was billed as blessing to Americans,
especially the needy. The law is a
monster that is destroying America whether or not it was meant to do so. Instead of being compassionate toward those
Americans who had no health insurance and affordable to those of low or modest
incomes, Obamacare is proving to be anything but compassionate and affordable.
Chris Jacobs at The Heritage Foundation suggested two ways that Obamacare traps people in poverty. Throughout history, Americans have known that
there were two very important and well proven ways to become successful in
America. The first way is to work hard for
success; the second way is to get married and to stay married.
Jacobs claims that Obamacare “includes
disincentives for individuals to marry and for Americans of low and modest
incomes to work. Discouraging work and
marriage will only perpetuate poverty and income inequality, not alleviate
them.” Here are her explanations.
“Discouraging Work: The way Obamacare calculates federal premium
subsidies and cost-sharing subsidies includes several `cliffs.’ A person might qualify for a hefty subsidy at
his current income, but if he gets a raise and makes a little more, that
Obamacare subsidy disappears. At these
cliffs, individuals and families will actually benefit more by working less
because additional earnings could cause them to lose thousands of dollars in
taxpayer-funded subsidies.
“Families facing these kinds of
poverty traps may ask the obvious questions:
If I will lose so much in government benefits by earning additional
income, why work?
“Rather than encouraging hard
work, initiative, and entrepreneurship.
Obamacare instead undermines these essential American values.
“Discouraging Marriage: Obamacare contains not one, but two penalties
on marriage – one for families with low and moderate incomes and another for
families with higher incomes. By
continuing failed policies that undermine the institution of marriage, Obamacare
will accelerate a root cause of income inequality in the United States.
“Here’s an example. A 50-year-old non-smoker making $35,000 per
year would qualify for a sizable insurance subsidy, according to the Kaiser
Family Foundation’s insurance subsidy calculator. The individual’s premium would be capped at
9.5 percent of income, resulting in an insurance subsidy of $2,065 paid by the
federal government.
“However, if this 50-year-old is
married to another 50-year-old who also makes $35,000 per year, the couple
would receive no insurance subsidy at all.
This couple would incur a marriage penalty of $4,130 in one year – equal
to the $2,065 that each individual could have received if they were not
married.
“As Urban Institute fellow Gene
Steuerle has said: `Our tax and welfare
system thus favors those who consider marriage an option – to be avoided when
there are penalties and engaged when there are bonuses. The losers tend to be those who consider
marriage to be sacred.’”
If our leaders in government were
interested in strengthening our nation, they would encourage Americans to
continue these traditional values. The
fact that they pass laws that undermine these values says to me that they are
not interested in a strong America. By
discouraging “work, initiative, and entrepreneurship,” the government is
essentially guaranteeing that those particular Americans will never achieve the
American Dream. By discouraging
marriage, the government is destroying stability in families and thus
destroying the stability of our society.
No comments:
Post a Comment