Barack Obama gave his “Oval Office” speech on amnesty on November 20, 2014 – just weeks after a wave election put Republicans in
charge of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. He obviously did not pay any attention to the
election results that showed the desires of the voters.
America has been welcoming
immigrants to our shores for over 200 years, and most of these immigrants have
made America a better place. Congress
passed laws stating who and how many immigrants could come into our nation, and
many immigrants have followed the law and waited their turns even as they have
watched other break the rules and come illegally. Americans are not against immigrants; we are
against illegal immigrants.
At any rate Mr. Obama believes
“our immigration system is broken” and “began doing what [he] could to secure
our borders.” He blames the Republicans
in the House of Representatives for not passing a “bipartisan bill” that had
passed the Senate. According to Mr.
Obama, the law “would have doubled the number of border patrol agents while
giving undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship if they paid a fine,
started paying their taxes, and went to the back of the line….”
Those mean old Republicans
refused to pass the bill! Even though
Mr. Obama believes “that the best way to solve this problem is by working
together to pass that kind of common sense law,” he decided to act on his own
“legal authority” to “help make our immigration system more fair and more
just.”
Mr. Obama then announced those
actions: (1) put “additional resources
for our law enforcement personnel” on the border “so that they can stem the
flow of illegal crossings, and speed the return of those who do cross
over.” (2) “Make it easier and faster
for high-skilled immigrants, graduates, and entrepreneurs to stay and
contribute to our economy.” (3) “Take
steps to deal responsibly with the millions of undocumented immigrants who
already live in our country.”
The Daily Caller reported that Mr. Obama directed immigration officers to “stop repatriating
illegals, unless the illegals have recently cross the border, or have been
convicted of a major crime” as part of his “Oval Office Amnesty.” “Recent data shows that Obama is successfully
reducing the repatriation of illegals who have been living in the United States
for some years.
“In 2012, his agencies were
repatriating roughly 30,000 illegals per month, out of a population of roughly
12 million. But that number fell to
roughly 20,000 per month in 2014, and down to 11,000 in January 2015, according
to a calculation by the Center for Immigration Studies.
“At the record low rate of
10,000 repatriations per month, it will take 100 years for Obama’s
administration to comply with federal law, assuming the federal government also
ends all other incentives – such as workplace authorization rules – that
encourage the return home of the 12 million illegal immigrants.”
Mr. Obama has directed his
agents to focus “law enforcement resources on high-priority threats” such as
criminals and gang members as well as people who recently came over the border. The cost of this “prioritization” is
high. “Each household of low-skill
workers – whether native-born of legal immigrants – costs American taxpayers
roughly $50,000 per year, in various transfer payments, such as IRS rebates,
anti-poverty programs, health-care programs and K-12 education costs, according
to the Heritage Foundation.”
Recognizing that “we’re not
going to deport 11 million people,” Mr. Obama decided to redirect “federal
resources from enforcement to give get-out-of-jail residency cards to illegal
immigrants. The cards will allow at
least 5 million illegals to compete for jobs, get IRS anti-poverty payments,
get Social Security Numbers and also get on a fast-track process to citizenship
and full access to federal support programs.”
Mr. Obama also threatened
“consequences” if law enforcement officers do not enforce his amnesty. U.S. Senator James Lankford (R-Okla.) is
demanding answers to this question “in light of a recent federal court ruling against
Obama’s policy.” He is asking what
“specific consequences” the Obama administration would take if an Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent did not obey Mr. Obama’s amnesty rules.
Senator Lankford sits on the
Senate subcommittee with oversight of Department of Homeland Security
employees. He sent a letter to the White
House asking for answers. Among those
questions is this one: “How should
agents balance their oath to defend the Constitution with your orders to follow
policies that a federal court deemed in violation of federal law?” Other questions can be found in Senator Lankford’s letter found at this site.
The man who sits in the White
House and took an oath to uphold the laws of our land has brought immigration
chaos to our nation.
The
men and women who are supposed to enforce our laws are threatened with
“consequences” if they fulfill their responsibilities. More and more illegal aliens are crossing our
borders because of the talk of amnesty.
Why are Mr. Obama, Harry Reid,
and their cohorts so willing to have illegals overrun our nation? One obvious answer is they need more people
to vote for Democrats because Americans – including African-Americans - are
wising up to their antics and voting Republicans into office. Another one could be a desire to completely destroy
our American way of life. Whatever the true
answers may be, they are not good for America or Americans. Another good question is, can America survive
Mr. Obama?
No comments:
Post a Comment