The topic of discussion for this
Constitution Monday is the “rights” that are not in the Constitution. Liberals
tried to convince everyone in their fight against President Trump that people who
had never been in America had a Constitutional “right” to come here. There is
no such right listed in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights.
Nate Madden at Conservative Review explains another right that is not a real “right.” In a 2001 case before the Supreme Court – Zadvydas
v. Davis – concerned how long an illegal alien can be detained. The Court
ruled 5-4 that undocumented immigrants could not be held more than 90 days. This
sort of created a “right” for the alien to be released back into the general
population. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissent the vote, and Scalia
wrote the following dissent.
Insofar
as a claimed legal right to release into this country is concerned.
An
alien under final order of removal stands on an equal footing with an
inadmissible alien at the threshold of entry: He has no such right.
We
are offered no justification why an alien under a valid and final order of
removal – which has totally extinguished whatever right to presence in this
country he possessed – has any greater due process right to be released into
the country than an alien at the border seeking entry.
[A]n inadmissible alien at the border
has no right to be in the United States.
Justice Scalia, joined by Justice
Frankfurter, used a dissent from Justice Robert Jackson in Shaughnessy v. United States in 1953: “Due process does not invest
any alien with a right to enter the United States nor confer on those admitted
the right to remain against the national will.
Nothing
in the Constitution requires admission or sufferance of aliens hostile to our
scheme of government.”
All people have the right to be
treated with respect as human beings, but they have no fundamental or
Constitutional right to enter America or to stay here without permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment