The topic of discussion for this
Constitution Monday concerns the need for Americans to always vote for the
Constitution in every election. In every election there are politicians who
make many promises, most of which they cannot or will not ever deliver. The
voter must see through the mists of promises to see how the politician will
protect and preserve the Constitution.
Like
many other Americans, I watched the process of the 2016 presidential election quite
closely. I had my favorites, none of which were current members of Congress
because I wanted the conservative people to stay in place. Therefore, I leaned
toward conservative governors. I did not choose Donald Trump during the
Primary. Once he became the Republican nominee, he had my vote. I looked at the
alternative – Hillary Clinton – and did not consider it even close!
I voted for Trump in order to keep
Clinton out of the White House. I did not want her to have the ability to
nominate future justices on the Supreme Court. Even though I had no idea what
Trump would do as President, I had a fairly good idea of what Clinton would do.
I chose Liberty over tyranny. I found that I was far from alone in my choices.
Mark Alexander at The Patriot Post posted an article expressing the same choice. He explains that people asked him
for months, “How will you vote?” He gave the answer that he has given every
election since he first voted: “For our Constitution – for the candidate who is
most likely to nominate constitutionally constructionist judges to the Supreme
Court, those who will promote Liberty over tyranny.”
Alexander’s answer is a good one for
all Americans to keep in mind. Millions of people, including Alexander and I,
learned the importance of our votes for Trump soon after he was inaugurated.
Only ten days later he nominated Neil Gorsuch to fill the Supreme Court seat
left open by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. A week ago we again saw the
importance of our votes for Trump when he nominated Brett Kavanaugh to replace
Justice Anthony Kennedy who is retiring.
Trump essentially nominated a man
who will move the court to the side that protects the Constitution. The
meltdown by the Left indicates how important this decision was. The new nominee
shared his philosophy as a judge.
My judicial philosophy is
straightforward. A judge must be independent and must interpret the law, not
make the law. A judge must interpret statutes as written. And a judge must
interpret the Constitution as written, informed by history and tradition and
precedent.
The Left thinks that the
Constitution was written by some old white men who did not understand our day
and that it is a living document that changes to fit the current beliefs of
anyone who does not like what it says. The Left likes judges and justices who
make the law rather than interpret what is written. There is little wonder why
the Left is so upset that Trump would nominate a person like Kavanaugh to fill
the seat.
With his two nominees for justices,
Donald Trump has proven to be a President who will preserve and protect the
Constitution. I feel much satisfaction for my choice to vote for him. We should
always vote for the Constitution and Liberty!
No comments:
Post a Comment