The topic of discussion for this Constitution Monday is a question: What happens if the wrong person was inaugurated as the President of the United States on January 20, 2021? The question about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election continues to grow louder and stronger, and the reasons to doubt the results strengthen.
As I have said before, there were
strange doings across the nation on Election Night 2020. Election fraud is nothing
new and most likely takes place in every election. However, the amount of documented
fraud that took place in 2020 surpasses that of any other year.
Jeff Lukens posted an article that
collected the evidence of fraud from several different directions. He mentioned the
full forensic audit taking place in Maricopa County, Arizona, which is nearing
completion. Democrats are panicky about the audit and have tried several
different ways to stop it. The latest attempt to stop it was made by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland who addressed the right to vote last Friday.
Garland called voting “a fundamental
element to our democracy” while testifying before Congress. “We know that
expanding the ability of all eligible citizens to vote is the central pillar.”
He claimed that it is the “duty” of his agency to protect the voting rights of
all Americans. He said that the Department of Justice will continue to “protect
the democracy to which all Americans are entitled.”
So far this year at least 14 states have
passed new laws that make it harder to vote…. Some jurisdictions, based on
disinformation, have utilized abnormal post-election audit methodologies that
may put the integrity of the voting process at risk and undermine public
confidence in our democracy.
It sounds like Garland will attempt
to shut down all audits, but he may have a difficult time with the one in
Arizona. The Arizona Senate already went to court about the audit several times
and are operating under the approval of the court.
Lukens next mentioned a report published
by Peter Navarro that claims to have evidence of “widespread fraud,
ballot-stuffing, and other election irregularities” in the presidential
election. The apparent goal of liberals and progressives was to flood the
election with illegal votes. Molly Ball confirmed the strategy in her TIME
Magazine article.
Trump said on Dec. 2. “Within days after
the election, we witnessed an orchestrated effort to anoint the winner, even
while many key states were still being counted.”
In a way, Trump was right.
There was a conspiracy unfolding behind
the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance
from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing
activists and business titans. The pact was formalized in a terse,
little-noticed joint statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO
published on Election Day. Both sides would come to see it as a sort of
implicit bargain – inspired by the summer’s massive, sometimes destructive
racial-justice protests – in which the forces of labor came together with the
forces of capital to keep the peace and oppose Trump’s assault on democracy.
The handshake between business and labor
was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the
election – an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but
to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted. For more than
a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up
America’s institutions as they came under simultaneous attack from a remorseless
pandemic and an autocratically inclined President. Though much of this activity
took place on the left, it was separate from the Biden campaign and cross
ideological lines, with crucial contributions by nonpartisan and conservative
actors. The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a
Trump victory. It was an election so calamitous that no result could be
discerned at all, a failure of the central act of democratic self-governance
that has been a hallmark of America since its founding.
The above statements are almost
ludicrous, and the “loosely organized coalition of operatives” working in the shadows
of the campaign sound a whole lot like secret combinations. Ball’s words sound
like she is fulfilling scripture where she calls black white, and white black,
evil good and good evil. Her article continues by explaining how the secretive
work was accomplished.
Their work touched every aspect of the
election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure
hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off
voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions
of people to vote by mail for the first time. They successfully pressured
social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used
data-driven strategies to fight viral smears….
What the secretive correlation
accomplished is shown is the following chart published by Peter Navarro. The
small print says that the checkmarks indicate “Wide-Spread Evidence,” while the
asterisks indicate “Some Evidence.”
Lukens’s article continued by stating some
facts. (1) “Trump received millions more votes in 2020 than in 2016, and
Republicans swept most congressional and down-ballot offices.”
(2)
“Trump won bellwether Ohio,
which no winning president has failed to carry in that state's history, by a
more considerable margin than he did in 2016. Pennsylvania was
trending the same on Election Night until they mysteriously stopped counting
votes late in the evening.” (3) Republican poll watchers were denied
access in several cities, including Philadelphia. (4) “Similar fraudulent
actions occurred in Maricopa County, Atlanta, Las Vegas, Detroit, and Milwaukee.”
Lukens then addressed the
cyber-fraud, which is being exposed by Mike Lindell, the owner of MyPillow.
Numerous stores have refused to sell his products, and he was forced to create
a new social media site that Big Tech cannot de-platform. However, he continues
his quest to expose election fraud. Lukens wrote:
Lindell estimates that close to 3,000
cyber-attacks occurred from around the world on Nov. 3-4. He has identified 20
attacks alone where Trump votes were flipped for Biden votes and were enough to
change the election outcome. Notice the timestamp, source, and target I.P.
address, and the number of Trump votes flipped to Biden. This evidence demonstrates
irrefutable foreign interference in our election. The evidence is hard proof
that cannot be changed or altered or explained away.
There are some court cases that have
been filed. At least one was filed by Lindell, which he claims that he will win
with a 9-0 decision by the Supreme Court. The information compiled by Lindell,
which I am assuming is factual, is actually scary. Lindell claimed that these
are only 20 of the known attacks, and there are many additional ones.
Lukens concluded, “Both Navarro’s ground fraud and Lindell’s cyber-fraud were enough to swing the election independently. Together, there is overwhelming evidence that the election was stolen.” Be sure to check Lukens’ article because the charts may not be allowed on my blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment