My VIP for this week is President-elect Donald Trump, the Time Magazine Person of the Year. He was honored this week by being asked to ring the bell to open the Stock Exchange. According to Steve McKee at The Daily Signal, George Washington may have been our greatest president.
The reason? His [Washington’s] rejection
of the predations of power. At the end of the Revolutionary War, Washington had
the leverage and prestige to anoint himself America’s monarch, but refused to
do so. When Washington resigned his military commission, King George III called
him “the greatest man in the world.”
And as the only president twice
unanimously elected by the Electoral College, Washington could have served for
life. He instead chose to step down after two terms and return to Virginia and
his beloved Mount Vernon.
McKee
believes that Trump “has the unique opportunity to emulate” Washington. His
reason: the fact that Trump knows the job of being President of the United
States and is not a true “lame duck” who will “lac the political power to get
much done.”
Having already served one term as
president, however, Trump is getting off to a running start. And having once again
earned the imprimatur of the American people who understand who he is and what
he intends to accomplish, he has his mandate. Unable to run again, he can think
in historical terms.
Washington could be Trump’s model as he
exercises the duly elected powers of the executive branch to dismantle its
unconstitutional elements and unwind the administrative state.
There’s much that can be done. Twenty-five
years ago, noted economist Milton Friedman matter-of-factly outlined 11
Cabinet-level departments that should go: Agriculture, Commerce, Education,
Energy, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, Interior,
Labor, Transportation, and Veterans Affairs. (There was no Department of
Homeland Security at the time, but we can guess what Friedman would have said
about that.)
To be fair, Friedman argued that some
functions of these eliminated government departments, such as stewarding the
nuclear stockpile and taking care of veterans should be maintained.
Beyond that, we know that expensive
entitlements such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid can’t just be “undone.”
But they can, and must, be reformed.
The idea of putting some two-thirds of the
executive branch on the chopping block sounds shocking to those of us who’ve
grown up in the era of Big Government. And some would say we can’t possibly go
that far – these departments are too big, too deeply ingrained in our way of
life, and employ too many people to be unraveled.
I say that’s why they must be unraveled,
to tame the federal Leviathan that has become as dangerous to liberty as it is
economically unproductive.
That’s not to say the new Trump
administration should be cavalier about how it goes about the task, which is
why, for example, generous severance packages are being mentioned for employees
displaced by the work of Trump’s advisory commission – the Department of
Government Efficiency, or DOGE.
Nor should the second Trump administration
be unrealistic about the unanticipated consequences resulting from a dramatic
reduction in the size and scope of the federal government.
But there’s nothing that says problems
such as poverty, policing, and public health must be handled at the federal
level. In fact, the Constitution reserves those powers to the states or the
people.
To be sure, any unwinding of this giant
ball of yarn must be handled wisely and deliberately, and there’s room for
plenty of debate regarding what stays and what goes.
But the more the federal government can be
returned to the limits the Founders intended (and the American people ratified),
the more we will return self-governance to the states, to the cities, and to
the people, where it belongs.
Progressivism has gotten into quite a mess
over the past hundred years, and it’s likely to require a decade or more of
conservative victories to return us anywhere close to first things.
However, if our new president emulates the
example of George Washington and seeks a similar legacy, he can retire to his
beloved Mar-a-Lago when his work is done – knowing that America will thrive for
another 250 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment