The topic of discussion for this Constitution Monday is Constitution Day, a day commemorated every year on September 17. American patriots love and appreciate the U.S. Constitution. However, some of the people who appreciate the Constitution the most are those who have lived without it. One such person is Shima Baradaran Baughman, professor of law at Brigham Young University. She “studies the constitutional rights of defendants.” She also wonders why so many Americans “have an allergic reaction to celebrating the Constitution.”
Baughman
shared a personal experience that happened when she was a toddler sitting on
her mother’s lap. Men came to other home and took her mother for the crime of “rising
money for an organization that believed in free speech and freedom of religion.”
She
was taken to a small, bare room where her “trial” lasted only minutes. A few
men red the charges against her. She had no lawyer, no chance to present
evidence, no jury of her peers. Her only option was to plead guilty.
She
was sentenced on the spot to 10 years in prison with no appeals possible. She
was then transported to the infamous Evin Prison, a place notorious for
crushing the human spirit. She had no bed – only a dirty floor crammed so
tightly with other political prisoners that she could only sleep on her side.
Hygiene was nonexistent and despair hung in the air.
The
most horrific part came at night, when she and the other women would lie awake,
knowing that guards would select a random number of inmates to be executed by
firing squad as an intimidation tactic. Imagine trying to rest, not knowing if
your name would be called before dawn.
This
was not justice. It was the brutal face of unchecked power, where a government
endured little due process or opposition.
My
mother was miraculously released two years later. But that experience seared
into me the difference between system
ruled by humans and a system ruled by law. And that is why Constitution Day is
not just symbolic for me; it is a celebration of the very principles that guard
against the nightmare my mother and I once lived through.
In
America, the Constitution was designed precisely to prevent such abuses. The
founders, aware of the abuses of human ambition and corruption, built a system
where power was never meant to rest unchecked in one person, one faction, or
one council. By design, power is separated into three branches – legislative,
executive, and judicial – each with the ability to check the other. No
president can govern without some degree of consensus, no legislation should
step beyond constitutional constraint and be enforced by a court, and no judge
should rule outside the bounds of the law.
The
Constitution does more than create structure, though; it enshrines rights that
shield individuals from government abuse. Rights that my mother would have
dearly benefited from when I was young. The Bill of Rights guarantees that the
government cannot silence speech, dictate religion, or invade the privacy of
one’s home.
The
Fourth Amendment has been interpreted to require that officers “knock and
announce” their entry for an arrest, except in exigent circumstances. Other
amendments ensure the accused have the right to counsel and a jury of their
peers, that punishments are not cruel or arbitrary, and that the accused
maintain the right to appeal in the courts. Contrast this with my mother’s “trial”
in Iran: no lawyer, no witnesses, no jury, no hope for protections.
Baughman
explained that she understands the fear that immigrants have – particularly undocumented
ones – because “[her] own parents knew that fear.” She continued by explaining
that her parents joined “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints” and
were “undocumented for a time” while they applied for asylum, “terrified of
returning to Iran and facing political and religious persecution.”
Baughman’s
parents “were blessed to obtain legal status quickly, but it came at great
cost: they surrendered all their land and possessions in Iran to pursue
opportunity and freedom in America with nothing but hope.” She continued by
explaining that her parents, after becoming “U.S. Citizens in 1999,” sponsored “many
of their family members who left behind homes and successful careers in Iran in
pursuit of U.S. constitutional protections.
My
relatives who immigrated are grateful for the reliability of living under the
rule of law: in America, an architect or engineer’s work ends in payment every
time – back home, half the clients might never pay.
Here,
property rights are also real; what you build and own is protected, not
potentially seized by the government on a whim. And the American dream is still
alive as education and entrepreneurship can move families forward in ways that
are often impossible elsewhere. This is why, even with its imperfections,
people across the world still yearn to come to America.
There
is much more to Baughman’s paper that is interesting and that I recommend
studying. She concludes her paper by describing why American students and all
citizens should receive a constitutional education.
A
Constitutional education does not require loyalty to a party, but to a
framework that tempers power, protects rights, and secures liberty for all.
For
someone who grew up in a system without those safeguards, the difference is a
land people will risk losing everything to call home. And for every American it
is a reason to celebrate a day set aside to honor it.
The
Constitution does not benefit one party over another; nor is it the property of
a faction – it is a covenant that protects us and those with whom we most
deeply disagree. It remains our common inheritance, the shield of liberty that
guards every American, no matter their conviction – promising that freedom and
dignity are not granted by rulers but guaranteed by law and divinely appointed
rights.
We
honor the Constitution best by understanding and defending it – not only for
ourselves, but for those like my cousin still waiting patiently in line to
taste its promise.
No comments:
Post a Comment