Declaration of Independence

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. - That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
Showing posts with label IRS scandal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IRS scandal. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Another Watergate?

                Will the IRS scandal be Barack Obama’s Watergate?  It could be! The Watergate scandal caused Richard Nixon to resign from the office of President of the United States in August 1974.  It was a major political scandal that resulted from a burglary at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters on June 17, 1972, and the cover-up from the Nixon administration.

                “When the conspiracy was discovered and investigated by the U.S. Congress, the Nixon administration’s resistance to its probes led to a constitutional crisis.  The term Watergate has come to encompass an array of clandestine and often illegal activities undertaken by members of the Nixon administration.  Those activities included such `dirty tricks’ as bugging the offices of political opponents and people of whom Nixon or his officials were suspicious.  Nixon and his close aides ordered harassment of activist groups and political figures, using the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).  The scandal led to the discovery of multiple abuses of power by the Nixon administration, articles of impeachment, and the resignation of Richard Nixon, the President of the United States.  The scandal also resulted in the indictment of 69 people, with trials or pleas resulting in 48 being found guilty and incarcerated, many of whom were Nixon’s top administration officials.
                “The affair began with the arrest of five men for breaking and entering into the DNC headquarters at the Watergate complex on June 17, 1972.  The FBI connected cash found on the burglars to a slush fund used by the Committee for the Re-Election of the President (CRP), the official organization of Nixon’s campaign.  In July 1973, as evidence mounted against the President’s staff, including testimony provided by former staff members in an investigation conducted by the Senate Watergate Committee, it was revealed that President Nixon had a tape-recording system in his offices and that he had recorded many conversations.  After a protracted series of bitter court battles, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the president had to hand over the tapes to government investigators; he eventually complied.  Recordings from these tapes implicated the president, revealing he had attempted to cover up the questionable goings-on that had taken place after the break-in.
Facing near-certain impeachment in the House of Representatives and equally certain conviction by the Senate, Nixon resigned the presidency on August 9, 1974.  On September 8, 1974, his successor, Gerald Ford, pardoned him.”  President Ford tried to heal the nation by pardoning Nixon.  His attempt backfired and cost President Ford his own re-election.

                Wayne Root claims he “was the victim of a widespread politically-motivated criminal attack by the IRS.”  He also claims that he has evidence tying the IRS scandal to the Obama White House.  Judicial Watch, a government watch dog, took Root’s case.

                Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch, stated:  “The Obama IRS obstructed the release of Wayne Root’s tax documents.  The abuse of process Judicial Watch and Wayne suffered through to get these documents is scandalous.  Now we know why the Obama IRS was hesitant to give Wayne his own IRS files.  These documents show the Obama IRS scandal was more than just suppressing the Tea Party, it was also about auditing critics of President Obama.  Richard Nixon had to resign from office for less….” 

                Documents obtained by Judicial Watch clearly show that Root was targeted by IRS.  He believes the attack on him was meant to destroy, bankrupt, or silence him.  Root’s report of the experience is very interesting.  I encourage you to read it.


Thursday, August 21, 2014

IRS Scandal

                The liberty principle for this Freedom Friday is the simple fact that the federal government should be transparent to American citizens.  Then the government attempts to hide facts from its citizens, they must be called on it.

                Judicial Watch continues to fight for freedom for all Americans.  When Congress could not obtain copies of former IRS official Lois Lerner, Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.  As a result, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued the following order.  

                “In light of [26] the Declaration filed by the IRS, the IRS is hereby ORDERED to file a sworn Declaration, by an official with the authority to speak under oath for the Agency, by no later than August 22, 2014.  In this Declaration, the IRS must:  (1) provide information about its efforts, if any, to recover missing Lois Lerner emails from alternate sources (i.e., Blackberry, iPhone, iPad); (2) provide additional information explaining the IRS’s policy of tracking inventory through use of bar code property tags, including whether component parts, such as hard drives, receive a bar code tag when serviced.  If individual components do not receive a bar code tag, provide information on how the IRS tracks component parts, such as hard drives, when being serviced; (3) provide information about the IRS’s policy to degauss hard drives, including whether the IRS records whose hard drive is degaussed, either by tracking the employee’s name or the particular machine with which the hard drive was associated; and (4) provide information about the outside vendor who can verify the IRS’s destruction policies concerning hard drives.”

                I am grateful that someone is still on the job fighting corruption at the IRS.  I hope Judicial Watch will be successful in ferreting out the information necessary to indict someone and send them to prison for targeting tea party groups.  We must have a transparent federal government!


Tuesday, March 4, 2014

"Not a Smidgen of Corruption

                The IRS scandal continues to make news.  Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly recently asked Barack Obama some questions about the IRS practice of discriminating against conservatives applying for tax-exempt status.  Mr. Obama said the people at the IRS were “confused” and made some “boneheaded decisions,” but he claimed there was “not even a smidgen of corruption” in the IRS.  Hundreds of conservative and Christian organization applied for 501(c)4 status and were grilled about their private lives, even the content of their prayers and their support for pro-life protests.

                Peter Breen, vice president and senior counsel at the Thomas More Society, expressed shock about Mr. Obama’s statement:  “Thomas More Society has defended six pro-life organizations whose First Amendment rights were trampled upon by the IRS because of the group’s dedication to the sanctity of life.  In fact, in May and August of 2013, Thomas More Society produced two memos to the House Committee on Ways and Means, totaling over 500 pages of evidence that the IRS specifically targeted and harassed pro-life and conservative charities, illegally questioning their religious activities and withholding their tax-exemptions.
                “Frankly we are shocked that President Obama would state that there was `not even a smidgen of corruption’ involved in the IRS scandal.  The Obama administration must stop making excuses to cover up the IRS’ illegal activity and instead deal justly with the corruption and scandal that occurred.”

                Cleta Mitchell, an attorney representing some of the IRS-targeted conservative groups, testified recently at a congressional hearing into the scandal.  Ms. Mitchell was questioned by Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Florida) if she agreed with Mr. Obama’s assessment of the situation.  She called his argument “Absolutely false.”  She then cited a report revealing “that of 162 organizations being scrutinized by the IRS, 83 percent of them were conservative groups.”  Jay Sekulow, another attorney testifying on behalf of his clients, said the IRS’s targeting of conservatives had a “chilling effect.”

                Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-South Carolina) did not like Mr. Obama’s claim that there is not even a “smidgen of corruption” in the IRS abuse scandal.  You can see Rep. Gowdy tear Mr. Obama’s argument to shreds here.  

                Lois Lerner was an executive at IRS in the beginning of the scandal but refused to testify before Congress during the investigation into misconduct at the agency, taking the “Fifth Amendment.”   The House Ways and Means Committee recently obtained emails showing that Lerner worked on the new rules for targeting conservatives in secret with officials at the Treasury Department.  “The regulations, which are currently pending, would allow the IRS to crack down on political activity by non-profit groups.  A June 2012 email from a Treasury official to Lerner suggests that they work `off plan’ – bureaucratic shorthand for keeping their meetings off of publicly available schedules – to devise the rules.  Critics say the rules that resulted would permit agents to shut down dissent by non-profit groups.”

                In spite of all the charges of corruption at the IRS, the agency announced it would pay bonuses to their employees.  Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah),  the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, does not think IRS employees should be rewarded for targeting conservative political groups.  “The IRS is accused of targeting conservative groups, with many of its employees having conducted themselves in a manner inappropriate for government officials, and the agency decides to reinstate employee bonuses?  This is outrageous.”


                It appears that Mr. Obama and his minions are the only people who believe there is not a “smidgen” of corruption in the IRS.  Is it fair to consider the reinstatement of bonuses to IRS employees to be “hush money?”

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

IRS Scandal

                The scandal involving the Internal Revenue Service targeting conservative individuals and groups seems to be picking up steam.  The House Ways and Means Committee heard testimony from six different conservatives who were targeted by IRS.  There were several interesting moments in the hearing.  Becket Adams of The Blaze highlighted four of them and ranked them.

                Number four:  Congressman Jim McDermott (D-Washington) proved he is an idiot when he blamed the conservatives for the targeting.  He plainly said that they would not have been targeted if they had not applied for tax exempt status.   Conservatives should be grateful that Representative Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) was on the job.  He decided to forego asking his original question and obtained answers that clearly showed McDermott’s “blame the victim” strategy was not going to go unchallenged.

                Number three:  Becky Gerritso (Wetumpka, Iowa, Tea Party) spoke plainly and to the point:  “I’m not here as a serf or a vassal. I’m not begging my lords for mercy.  I’m a born-free American woman, wife, mother, and citizen.  And I’m telling my government that you’ve forgotten your place.

                “It’s not your responsibility to look out for my well-being and to monitor my speech.  It’s not your right to assert an agenda.  The post that you occupy exists to preserve American liberty.  You’ve sworn to perform that duty and you have faltered.

                Number two:  Testimony was given that the IRS was protecting Planned Parenthood. Sue Martinek (President of the Coalition for Life of Iowa) testified that she was told “verbally that we needed to send in a letter with the entire board’s signatures stating that under penalty of perjury we would not picket/protest or organize groups to picket/protest outside of Planned Parenthood.”  She was told that the application from her group would go through as soon as IRS received the letter.  She was also asked for details of the group’s prayer meetings.

                Number one:  John Eastman, chairman of the National Organization for Marriage, testified that NOM has proof that the IRS intentionally leaked the confidential information of his organization’s donors to groups opposed to his organization.

                How do we know that the IRS was targeting conservatives?  More than 500 hundred conservative groups had difficulty obtaining tax exempt status while no liberal group had problems.  J. Christian Adams of Breitbart.com wrote of liberal groups who enjoyed tax-exempt status while conservative groups were held in limbo.   “Campaign finance zealots and free speech regulators have sought to stifle the freedom of conservative organizations, such as the Tea Party, by falsely claiming they are `political’ while giving a pass to leftist groups that still enjoy unimpaired 501© IRS tax-exempt status.  As the IRS attacked Tea Party groups, it left hundreds of leftist activist groups alone.  A quick review of just eight of those leftist, tax-exempt activist groups demonstrates the IRS’s hypocrisy.” 

                The eight leftist groups reviewed by Adams are:  1) Americans United for Change (supports progressive ideas), 2) Ruckus Society (part of the Occupy Movement), 3) Women’s Action for New Directions (funded by George Soros), 4) New World Foundation (community activists), 5) Fierce (organizes gay activists using the Saul Alinsky organizing techniques), 6) Black Alliance for Just Immigration (advocates for immigration changes), 7) Brennan Center for Justice (works to derail public policies such as photo voter identification laws), and 8) Voto Latino (works to mobilize Latino voters).

                There is sure to be more exciting news about the IRS scandal.  The Obama Administration is surely hoping that this scandal will take our interest off the murders of Americans in Benghazi.


Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Three Major Scandals


                The Obama Administration is battling on three fronts as Americans are asking more and more questions about what is happening and why.  The three issues include the terrorist attacks in Benghazi, the IRS targeting conservative individuals and groups, and the DOJ illegally tapping twenty telephone lines at the Associated Press in an effort to identify a whistleblower.  The Administration is trying to cover up all three scandals with lies and more lies.

                The terrorist attacks in Benghazi jumped into the headlines last week during congressional hearings.  The testimonies of three whistleblowers were at direct odds to the reports out of the Obama Administration.  It seems that the more we learn about the attacks, the more lies we hear.  The lies have come from a variety of people, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, Jay Carney, and others.

                Thomas Sowell, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, wrote:  “There can be honest differences of opinion on many subjects.  But there can also be dishonest differences.  Last week’s testimony under oath about events in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, makes painfully clear that what the Obama administration told the American people about those events were lies out of whole cloth.”

                Glenn Beck highlighted the lies that he considered to be the “most important and revealing falsehoods” that were “fed to the American people” about what happened in Benghazi.  He noted that there were more lies, but he chose only the “top” twenty and listed them in no particular order.

1.   Susan Rice, UN Ambassador:  “Our current best assessment based on the information we have at present is that in fact what this began as was a spontaneous, not a premeditated, response to what had transpired in Cairo.”  (The testimonies of whistleblowers prove that the Obama Administration knew in advance.)

2.   Barack Obama, US President:  “What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.”  (Testimony proves that the video was not the cause.)

3.  Stephanie Cutter, Obama’s campaign spokesperson:  “But the entire reason that this has become the, you know, political topic it is is because of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan.”  (No, it is because four Americans were killed and the Administration lied to Americans.)

4.   President Obama:  “That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video, sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.”  (He was still blaming the video days or weeks later.  This is important because he is using the defense that “we corrected it” by calling it an act of terror two days later.)

5.   President Obama to the UN:  “I know there are some who ask, why don’t we just ban such a video.  The answer is enshrined in our laws.  Our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech.”  (He is still blaming the video and claiming that “some” people were calling for freedom of speech to be limited.)

6.   Hilary Clinton, then Secretary of State:  “Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior along with the protest that took place at our embassy in Cairo yesterday as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”  (She blamed the video.)

7.   Victoria Nuland, State Department:  “We can all condemn this reprehensible video.”  (She blamed the video.  This makes three people from the State Department, one political operative, and the U.S. President.)

8.   Jay Carney, White House spokesman:  “Find the video that has been so offensive to Muslims to be disgusting and reprehensible.”

9.   Hillary Clinton:  “To address the video circulating on the Internet that has led to these protests.”  (She blamed the video – again.)

10. Susan Rice:  “Was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video.”  (She blamed the video – again.)

11. Jay Carney:  “And it is in response, not to United States policy, not to obviously the administration, not to the American people.  It is in response to a video.”  (He blamed the video – again.)

12. Jay Carney:  “Now we do not yet have indication that it was preplanned or premeditated.”  (“One of the people in Benghazi called the State Department with concerns warning of the attack” days before the attack.)

13. Joe Biden, U.S. Vice President:  “Well, we weren’t told they wanted more security and we did not know they wanted more security again.”  (Reporter:  “And CBS has learned that the U.S. mission in Libya reportedly – repeatedly asked for better security before last month’s attack on the American consulate in Benghazi.  A State Department officer says there were 13 confirmed security threats in the six months before the attack.  Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed three weeks ago.”

14. Jay Carney:  “The White House and State Department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to those talking points by either of those two – of these two institutions were changing the word consulate to diplomatic facility because consulate was inaccurate.”  (He continued the lies.)

15. President Obama:  “And make no mistake:  We will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.”  (No terrorists have been arrested, but the poor guy who made a video is still in prison.)

16. President Obama:  “You had a video that was released by somebody who lives here, sort of a shadowy character who is extremely offensive video directed at Mohammed and Islam.  We had nothing to do with the video.”  (He blames the video – again.)

17. David Axelrod, President’s right-hand man:  “It’s not a matter of blaming, that’s just the facts.  Sometimes intelligence has to catch up with the reality on the ground.  This was one of those cases.”  (Did he throw the CIA under the bus?  Good intelligence normally comes from information on the ground.  The Administration knew within a few hours that it was a terrorist attack but still blamed the video for more than two weeks.)

18.  Stephanie Cutter, mastermind of Obama’s re-election team:  “First I pretty the faux outrage from the RNC and the Republican Party.”  (Did she actually blame Republicans for trying to get to the truth about what happened in Benghazi?)

19. Hillary Clinton:  “Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they would go kill some Americans?”  (It does make a difference to many Americans, including the friends and families of the men who were killed.)

20.  Jay Carney:  “Let’s be clear:  These protests were in reaction to a video that had spread to the region.”

                The second scandal, the one at the IRS, may have been broken just to take heat from the Administration about Benghazi, but the President and his administration are being caught in lies about this issue also.  The President said yesterday that he heard about the problem the same time that all of us did, but Jay Carney, the White House spokesman, admitted the administration knew about the scandal since April 22. 

Jay Sekulow, chief counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice, told Glenn Beck on his TV show that the White House Counsel’s office was notified of the IRS issue three weeks ago.

                David Limbaugh, writer, author, attorney, and brother of Rush Limbaugh, wrote:  “It’s disgraceful that government bureaucrats, whether on their own initiative or at the direction of superiors, singled out anyone for special scrutiny, but what their selection criteria were makes it even worse.  Reportedly, the IRS field office in charge of evaluating applications for tax-exempt status decided to focus on groups making statements that [criticize the administration and what they are doing.]

                “Surely, we all understand the awesome and, frankly, horrifying power the IRS has come to have in our system, which originally didn’t even contemplate an income tax, much less oversight of it by such a monstrous bureaucratic leviathan.  What could be more chilling and destructive to our liberties than a government targeting – that’s its word, not mine – private citizens and organizations based on their political and ideological views?

                “If the First Amendment means anything, it is that the full force of the federal government will be used to safeguard, not suppress, the liberties of American citizens to utter political speech, especially speech critical of the government.  But instead, this IRS sought [to] abuse groups that criticized the administration and groups that wanted to teach people that under our Constitution, such government officials have no right to do this type of thing.

                The third scandal for the Administration comes from the discovery that the Department of Justice (DOJ) illegally tapped twenty telephone lines at the Associated Press (AP) in order to track down the identity of a whistleblower.  This is not the first time that this Administration has gone after whistleblowers, a practice that “sends a clear warning message to anyone thinking about ratting on the government.”

                The Blaze reported:  “The records obtained by the Justice Department listed incoming and outgoing calls and the duration of each call, for the work and home phone numbers of individual reporters, general AP office numbers in New York, Washington and Harford, Conn., and the main number for AP reporters in the House of Representatives press gallery, according to attorneys for the AP.

                “In all, the government seized those records for more than 20 separate telephone lines assigned to AP and its journalists in April and May of 2012.  The exact number of journalists who used the phone lines during that period is unknown but more than 100 journalists work in the offices whose phone records were targeted on a wide array of stories about government and other matters….”

                Buck Sexton, formerly an officer in the Central Intelligence Agency (assigned to the Counterterrorism Center and Office of Iraq Analysis) and currently national security editor at The Blaze, wrote:  “In just one week, President Barack Obama’s political machine has switched from endless campaign to survival mode.  And for the first time in Obama’s presidency, the damage to his regime may be permanent.

                “Three revelations have come together like an avalanche.  First, there was a Benghazi hearing that proved beyond any reasonable doubt that this administration is feckless, dishonest, and cravenly politicized.  But in its aftermath on Friday, an executive branch information dump dropped another bombshell:  the IRS does indeed target and intimidate conservative groups….

                “As the country was still reeling from the gut-wrenching testimony of three Benghazi whistleblowers and the IRS mea culpa, yet another log was thrown onto the bonfire of the Obama administration’s credibility.  Yesterday the Associated Press broke a news story that Obama’s Justice Department collected phone data on dozens of AP reporters as part of a national security leak investigation….”

                I am stunned that so much is happening at such a rapid rate, and I am curious as to the end result.  Many people think that this avalanche of investigations will bring down the Obama Administration, and some are calling for impeachment of the President.  Others think the scandals will be “swept under the rug” after a few questions are asked.  Still others think that employees at the lower levels will take the blows and the leaders will go free. 

Barack Obama has tried very hard to stand clear of anything that might stick to him and has effectively avoided doing any governing – just campaigning.  The fact that the scandals are coming from four different Departments – State, Justice, Finance (IRS), and Defense - with Secretaries supposedly answering directly to him indicates to me that he is responsible in one of at least two cases:  He knew about the issues and authorized them or he was not doing the work we pay him to do.  In either case, he keeps lying to us to cover up the scandals. 

We pay our Presidents $400,000 each year to administer the federal government, to supervise the federal employees, to oversee law enforcement officers and the military to keep us safe from foreign and domestic enemies, and to uphold our laws.  Those are his basic responsibilities, and he failed.  He is either intentionally doing wrong as part of his “fundamental transformation” of America or he is inept and cannot do the job.  I believe that we are way past the point where we should hold him accountable for his willing destruction of our nation or his inability to do the job.  I think it is time to put him under oath and start asking him some direct questions.