Good news came
about the standoff in Nevada between the Bureau of Land Management and the
Bundy Ranch. An announcement was made that
the federal officers would pull out because the situation had become too
dangerous for their employees and the public.
The
decision was apparently made after information came out that a company backed
by Communist China wanted the land for a renewable energy farm.
I was seriously wondering if the
U.S. Government was moving towards another disastrous showdown with American
citizens. It did not sound good to me to
hear that more than 200 federal officers converged near a ranch located in
Buckerville, Nevada. The federal officers were there to enforce a
mandate that Cliven Bundy remove his cattle from federal lands; they began to
round up his cattle to sell them. The
forced cattle roundup was causing concern for many people besides the Bundy
family. Elected officials in several
states weighed in, and militia members began to mobilize in support of their
fellow Americans.
I could not help thinking about what
happened at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, and Waco, Texas, when the Government used power against
American citizens. Randy Weaver and his
family, plus his friend Kevin Harris, were living at Ruby Ridge in northern
Idaho. Federal officers
laid siege to the property and caused a deadly confrontation in 1992. The confrontation ended with the death of
Weaver’s wife Vicki, their son Sammy, and Deputy U.S. Marshal William Francis
Degan.
“At the subsequent federal criminal
trial of Weaver and Harris, Weaver’s attorney Gerry Spence made accusations of
`criminal wrongdoing’ against every agency involved in the incident: the FBI, USMS, the Bureau of Alcohol,
tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and the United States Attorney’s Office
(USAO) for Idaho. At the completion of
the trial, the Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility
formed a Ruby Ridge Task Force to investigate Spence’s charges. The 1994 Task Force report was released in
redacted form by Lexis Counsel Connect and raised questions about the conduct
and policy of all the agencies.
“Public outcry over Ruby Ridge
and the subsequent Waco siege involving many of the same agencies and even the
same personnel fueled the widening of the militia movement. To answer public questions about Ruby Ridge,
the Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Government Information
held a total of 14 days of hearings between September 6 and October 19, 1995,
and subsequently issued a report calling for reforms in federal law enforcement
to prevent a repeat of Ruby Ridge and to restore public confidence in federal
law enforcement.”
The Waco, Texas, siege or massacre took place at a compound owned by the
religious group Branch Davidians.
Federal and Texas state law enforcement and military officers laid siege
at the compound from February 28 until April 19, 1993. The Branch Davidians sect separated from the
Seventh-day Adventist Church in 1955 and was led by David Koresh They lived at Mount Carmel Center ranch in
Elk, Texas, about nine miles east-northeast of Waco.
“The group was suspected of
weapons violations and a search and arrest warrant was obtained by the U.S.
federal agency Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). The incident began when the ATF attempted to
raid the ranch. An intense gun battle
erupted, resulting in the deaths of four agents and six Branch Davidians. Upon the ATF’s failure to raid the compound,
a siege was initiated by Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the standoff
lasting 51 days. Eventually, the FBI
launched an assault and initiated a tear gas attack in an attempt to force the
Branch Davidians out. During the attack,
a fire engulfed Mount Carmel Center, and 76 men, women, and children, including
David Koresh, died.
“Much dispute remains as to the
actual events of the siege. A particular
controversy ensued over the origin of the fire; a government investigation
concluded in 2000 that sect members themselves had started the fire. The events at Waco were cited as the primary
motivation for the perpetrators of the Oklahoma City bombing that took place
exactly two years later in 1995.”
Monica Morrell wrote
an article suggesting that the Nevada problem could be about water rights. Her article sheds even more light on why the
government went after Bundy’s cattle.
“Bunkerville in Nevada is
ensconced between the Virgin River and the main road, Riverside Road. The Virgin River is a tributary to Lake
Mead. The river, along with other
sources, discharges into Lake Mead, the largest reservoir in the United
States. Both the Virgin River and Lake
Mead are part of the Colorado River Basin.
In fact, Lake Mead is considered to be the largest surface water
collection for the Colorado River.
Whoever controls the water controls the vast wealth that is distributed
to a network of states at a crucial time during a water shortage?
Doug Hagmann was so concerned about what might happen at
the Bundy ranch that he called for the governor to send out the National Guard
to protect the people. “The current
critical nature of the crisis cannot be understated. In alleged response to a 20-year-old battle
over `illegal cattle grazing,’ along with a more recent claim related to
ostensibly protecting the allegedly endangered desert tortoise, the federal
Bureau of Land Management has been dispatched to the Bundy ranch. Do not be fooled by the innocuous sounding
name of this federal agency, however, as the deployment now consists of some
200 heavily armed federal troops, transported by military troop carriers and
equipped with sniper rifles and other military armaments. It is an army by any other name. [Obama’s civilian army?]
“Meanwhile, in response to this
show of force, armed members of patriotic militias are rallying around the
Bundy ranch en masse to protect the rights of a rancher and his family. Clearly, the lines of battle are being
drawn. Patriots and militias appear to
be preparing to square off against this federal army who are present in numbers
undeniably disproportionate to any perceived or actual threat.
“As the scene of the battle
begins to take form, the situation is needlessly and recklessly being permitted
to escalate in words and deeds. Today,
Clark County Commissioner Tom Collins threatened the patriotic militia members
rallying around the Bundys by publicly stating that those planning to travel to
Nevada in their support `better have funeral plans.’ Clearly, these are fighting words and an
obvious escalation to an already volatile situation.
“As those words were being
spoken, snipers equipped with high powered rifles with scopes continued to
train their weapons on American citizens.
As that threat now begins to reverberate throughout the nation, federal
troops are getting into position to launch whatever offensive that is being
planned by federal bureaucrats, merely waiting for the `go’ signal. The situation is deadly and deadly serious.”
Judi McLeod shared
information about other ranchers in Nevada and how the federal government
treated them. It sounds to me like the
Bundy family has a right to believe the government is coming after them!
Americans remember the results
of force at Ruby Ridge and Waco. I thought
the range war might be the “crisis” the Obama Administration has been waiting
for, the one they have been planning for, and preparing for with all their
regulations. Americans are fed up with
their power grabs and are stressed by the economic situation of the nation. I thought the fuse might be lit in Nevada but
am relieved to hear the Government has backed off – for now. Was this a test to see if Americans would
stand up to their Government in spite of the odds against them?
There are still many questions
about what happened in Nevada and why.
The Blaze did a story about seven questions people are asking. There are probably many more. The big question in my mind is whether or not
the U.S. Government was right in using force in Nevada or are we just getting
paranoid because of the many strange happenings in our nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment