The topic of
discussion for this Constitution Monday comes from Section 1 of the
Twenty-sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States: “The right of citizens of the United States,
who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged
by the United or by any State on account of age.” This provision simply states that all
American citizens age eighteen years and over have the right to vote unless the
right is forfeited by criminal actions or lack of mental ability to do so.
This amendment was adopted
quicker than any other amendment to the Constitution. It was proposed on March 23, 1971, and
ratified in July 1971. I remember when
this amendment was passed and ratified during the Vietnam War. Young adults insisted on the right to vote for
their leaders if they were going to be drafted and sent to fight for their
country under the direction of those same leaders.
W. Cleon Skousen explained, “The
determination of the legal age for adulthood has always been a matter of
conjecture. In the past it has usually
been set at age twenty-one; however, the government presumed to draft young men
at the age of eighteen, and therefore the point was raised that if they are old
enough to fight, they certainly should be old enough to vote. This was the original Anglo-Saxon criteria.
“The main objection to the reduction
of the voting age from twenty-one to eighteen has been that young people are
very impressionable at this age. It has
been observed that they become much more settled in their thinking as well as
their system of values by the time they reach twenty-one.
“Radical or agitational
movements are often emotionally attractive to eighteen-year-olds but hold
little or no attraction to them a few years later. Because youth are inclined to be innovative,
the liberal and progressive groups expected that they would reap a windfall
from the eighteen-year-old vote.
“As it turned out, however, the
eighteen-year-old franchise has not produced any significant change in the
political process. Young people have not
voted in a bloc, and they seem to take a serious and responsible attitude
toward this new trust.” (See The Making of America – The Substance and
Meaning of the Constitution, pp. 762-763.)
Robert Levy of The Heritage
Foundation further explained, “The Vietnam War provoked many draft-age
youngsters and like-minded adults to proclaim, `If eighteen-to-twenty-year-olds
are old enough to die for their country, they’re old enough to vote.’ That slogan is commonly cited as the impetus
for the Twenty-sixth Amendment. The
truth is somewhat less colorful. The
amendment was crafted primarily to overturn the holding of a fractured Supreme
Court in Oregon v. Mitchell (1970). The case had invalidated an attempt by
Congress to regulate voting age in state and local elections. Essentially, the Twenty-sixth Amendment did
what Congress could not do….
“After Oregon v. Mitchell, states unwilling to set their minimum voting
age at eighteen would have been required to maintain separate voting systems
for federal and nonfederal elections. To
avoid that complication and expense, the states opted for national uniformity
and ratified the Twenty-sixth Amendment in record time – a mere 107 days after
it was proposed by Congress.” (See The Heritage Guide to the Constitution, p.
432.)
No comments:
Post a Comment