My VIP for this week is Cliff Mass, a scientist who dares to go up against the mainstream media to destroy its
claims that Hurricane Harvey was stronger and had greater effects because of human-caused
climate change. The University of Washington atmospheric scientist published a new blog post that demolished the stories published by “dozens of media outlets.” He
says that the idea has no basis of truth.
Most of the stories were not based on
data or any kind of quantitative analysis….
This blog will provide a careful
analysis of the possible impacts of global warming on Hurricane Harvey. And the
results are clear: human-induced global
warming played an inconsequential role in this disaster….
The proximate cause of the disaster is
clear: the extreme rainfall was the result of a hurricane/tropical storm that
pulled in huge amounts of water vapor off the Gulf of Mexico (and beyond), and
which came into the Texas coast and then stalled for days. All tropical
storms/hurricanes bring large amounts of rain during landfall. What was different here was the stalling
and sitting over the same region for days.
Mass has a clear answer to “two
important questions” about the storm. The questions are: “Did global warming
juice up Hurricane Harvey, producing unusually heavy precipitation? Did global warming cause the storm to stagnate
for days? His clear answer to both questions is “no.” After offering many
scientific explanations and charts, Mass comes to this conclusion.
The bottom line in this analysis is that
both observations of the past decades and models looking forward to the future
do not suggest that one can explain the heavy rains of Harvey by global
warming, and folks that are suggesting it are poorly informing the public and
decision makers….
One does not need global warming to
explain extreme weather – sometimes the factors come together to produce an
unusual event… think of it as a meteorological royal flush.
Mass has support from the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The mainstream media does not seem to
care about scientific facts because truth does not sustain their agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment