The liberty principle for this
Freedom Friday is that Americans have the right to exercise their religion
without discrimination. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution clearly
states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof….” This principle should
apply to state and local governments also, but governments on several levels
are infringing on those rights according to the following recent stories in the
news.
We have the case of Steve and Bridget Tennes, owners of Country Mill Farms in Charlotte, Michigan. A city in Michigan banned this family of
farmers from “selling their goods at a local farmers market due to their
religious beliefs about marriage.” They put a post on Facebook that they would
not host same-sex weddings on their farm.
The Tenneses filed a federal lawsuit
against East Lansing in May after they were banned from selling produce at the
city’s farmers market. They recently went back to the court to ask for a
preliminary injunction or temporary order that would allow them to sell their
produce until the case is decided. These farmers have missed most of the
growing season because they were discriminated against due to their religious
beliefs. The Tennes family does not even live in East Lansing because their
farm is in Charlotte. They simply want to sell their apples and cider!
A second case is that of Colorado baker Jack Phillips and his Masterpiece Cake Shop. He was punished by his state for his
religious objection to making a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. When
Phillips tried to explain that he could not use his “artistry” to promote
same-sex marriage, he was “publicly berated and punished by the Colorado Civil
Rights Commission. He was actually called a Nazi by one supposedly “neutral”
commissioner.
Phillips is not the first baker to
be sued for refusing to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples, but he is the
first one to have his case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court agreed in
June to hear the case this fall and will hopefully rule in accordance with the
First Amendment.
The third case is Washington florist Barronelle Stutzman who was ordered by the Washington State Supreme Court to promote same-sex `weddings’
with her floral artistry in violation of her faith. The judges in the state
court said that a court could “order her to forfeit her business, savings,
retirement funds and home” as her “punishment for refusing.” She is petitioning
the U.S. Supreme Court for permission to join the Phillips case.
All three cases are about the
freedom to exercise religion without governments discriminating against them.
The Tennes family is willing to sell their apples and cider to anyone
regardless of sexual behavior, but they do not want to take part in any
same-sex marriages by hosting them at their farm. The baker and florist do not
want to participate in same-sex marriages by using their artistic talents to
celebrate something that that goes against their religious belief.
Agency, or the freedom to choose,
pre-dates this mortal life, and man does not have the right to destroy this
great God-given gift. Lucifer sought to destroy our agency in heaven, and we
were part of the heavenly hosts that fought to preserve our agency. We are
still fighting that war. Early members of The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints faced discrimination for their religious beliefs. Some of my
ancestors were among the people who were persecuted and driven out of their
homes several times.
Members of the Church believe
strongly in agency and freedom of religion. One of the articles of faith states
that “We claim the privilege of worshipping Almighty God according to the
dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them
worship how, where, or what they may” (Articles of Faith, 1:11).
The Prophet Joseph Smith said, “I am
bold to declare before Heaven that I am just as ready to die in defending the
rights of a Presbyterian, a Baptist, or a good man of any other denomination
[as for a Mormon]; for the same principle which would trample upon the rights
of the Latter-day Saints would trample upon the rights of the Roman Catholics,
or of any other denomination who may be
unpopular and too weak to defend themselves” (Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Joseph Smith [2007], 345).
No comments:
Post a Comment