I have never claimed to be an
expert on politics or anything political, and I know that I have made mistakes
in the past and will most likely do so in the future. I am, however, always willing to learn and to admit my mistakes. I admit that I made a mistake when I grouped
leftists and liberals together. Today I would like to set the record straight,
and I will do so with the help of an article posted at The Daily Signal by Dennis Prager.
I always thought that the words “leftist”
and “liberal” were just two different names for the same group of people.
Prager says that I was wrong. He also says that it is “vital” for people to
know “the difference between a leftist and a liberal” in order to understand “the
crisis facing America and the West today.”
The first truth that Prager wants us
to understand is that leftists and liberals “have almost nothing in common.” He
says that the reason that we think of them as being the same is because the “left
as appropriated the word `liberal’ so effectively that almost everyone … thinks
they are synonymous.” So, neither you nor I need feel alone if we thought that
they were the same.
Prager then gives several examples
as to why leftists and liberals are different. The first area is race. He says
that “the color of one’s skin is insignificant” to liberals and that liberals “are
passionately committed to racial integration.” To leftists, the very idea that “race
is insignificant is itself racist.” So, I suppose that one way we can separate
the leftists from the liberals is to determine who is throwing around the race
card.
Prager’s second example is
capitalism. “Liberals have always been pro-capitalism.” They see capitalism as “the
only economic means of lifting great numbers out of poverty.” They differ from
conservatives in the size of the role played by government in “lifting people
out of poverty.” As for leftists, Prager says that “Opposition to capitalism
and advocacy of socialism” are their “values.”
Prager’s third example is nationalism.
He says that liberals have a deep belief in the “nation-state, whether their
nation was the United States, Great Britain, or France.” He says that liberals
have “always wanted to protect American sovereignty and borders.” Leftists
oppose “nationalism because leftism is rooted in class solidarity, not national
solidarity.”
Prager’s fourth example is their
view of America. He says that Liberals venerated America. Watch American films
from the 1930s through the 1950s and you will be watching overtly patriotic,
America-celebrating films – virtually all produced, directed, and acted in by
liberals. Liberals well understand that America is imperfect but is `the last
best hope of earth’” (Lincoln). Prager’s comments on leftists deserve to be quoted
in their entirety.
To the left, America is essentially a
racist, sexist, violent, homophobic, xenophobic, and Islamophobic country. The
left around the world loathe America, and it is hard to imagine why the
American left would differ in this one way from fellow lefts around the world.
Leftists often take offense at having
their love of America doubted. But those left-wing descriptions of America are
not the only reason to assume that the left has more contempt than love for
America.
The left’s view of America was
encapsulated in then-presidential candidate Barack Obama’s statement in 2008. “We
are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of
America, he said.
Now, if you were to meet a man who said
that he wanted to fundamentally transform his wife, or a woman who said that
about her husband, would you assume that either loved their spouse? Of course
not.
Prager’s fifth example is free
speech. “The difference between the left and liberals regarding free speech is
as dramatic as the difference regarding race. No one was more committed than
American liberals to the famous statement, “I disapprove of what you say, but I
will defend to the death your right to say it.” Leftists on the other hand are
leading the fight to suppress the free speech of anyone who opposes them, such
as universities and Google. The left “claims to only oppose hate speech. But
protecting the right of person A to say what person B deems objectionable is
the entire point of free speech.”
Prager’s sixth example is western
civilization. “Liberals have a deep love of Western civilization. They taught
it at virtually every university and celebrated its unique moral, ethical,
philosophical, artistic, musical, and literary achievements.” Prager says that Franklin
Delano Roosevelt (FDR) is the “most revered liberal in American history” and
claims that FDR “frequently cited the need to protect not just Western
civilization but Christian civilization.” Leftists climbed all over Donald
Trump when he spoke about “protecting Western civilization” in his speech in
Warsaw, Poland. They say that this term is “a euphemism for white supremacy.”
Prager’s last example is Judaism and
Christianity. “Liberals knew and appreciated the Judeo-Christian roots of
American civilization” and often went to “church or synagogue” or appreciate
that “most of their fellow Americans did.” Leftists have “always had” contempt “for
religion (except for Islam today).
Prager ends his article with this
warning: “If the left is not defeated, American and Western civilization will
not survive.” He says that good liberals must join the fight against the left
in order to defeat it.
I think that this is an outstanding
tutorial on the differences between liberals and leftists. I certainly will not
confuse them again. My concern now is knowing what percentage of these people
that I lumped together are true liberals and what percentage are the leftists.
Have the leftists nearly destroyed the liberals or persuaded them to move to
the dark side, or are liberals holding the line against the leftists? Prager
says that the “good liberals” must join the fight, or the war will be lost.
Knowing the difference between liberals and leftists should improve our battle
skills.
No comments:
Post a Comment