. There are some questions about a
letter written by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to Attorney General William P. Barr in late March. Mueller spent two years investigating possible collusion between Donald Trump
and/or his campaign and the Russian government. He finally decided to end the
investigation – was it his idea or was he pressured by Barr? He sent his report
to the Attorney General who sent the final decisions to Congress. His report
indicated that there was no collusion between Trump and Russia and that there
was not enough evidence to charge Trump with obstructing the investigation. This
is basically what Mueller wrote in his report.
Barr sent a four-page letter to Congress
stating the main findings of the investigation: no collusion and not enough
evidence to prove obstruction. A few days later Mueller sent a letter to Barr
telling him that his letter to Congress “did not fully capture the context,
nature, and substance” of the investigation. The letter sparked a telephone
conversation between the two “longtime colleagues and friends” who apparently
disagree about how the investigation was reported to Congress.
It is interesting that Mueller’s
letter was not made public until the day prior to Barr testifying before
Congress tomorrow. Who kept the letter private? Who disclosed the fact that
there was a letter? What is in the letter that makes it crucial to be disclosed
at all? Why was it disclosed now? How will Congress use the disclosed letter in
their questioning of Barr? Is the release of the letter Mueller’s attempt to
keep the potential overthrow of the President going?
No comments:
Post a Comment